seixas Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 With a drop off of members to 318 and an increase of anarchies to 160, >50% of MI is now in anarchy. In anarchy and still twice the score of any other alliance... congrats? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentKilla Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 Definitely good to see the difference between self-preservation and loyalty to once Tag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreedomvilleAT Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 In anarchy and still twice the score of any other alliance... congrats? Check that again in a day or two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James IV Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 Murder Inc. does not have the allies to stop Judgment. Re-roll and I think you will be hit again. Judgment never Give peace to the AA Murder Inc. plox Aww, well thats cute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seixas Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 Check that again in a day or two. Okay But I feel as an experienced CN and CNTE player I should inform you, no amount of NS that you might be able to knock of MI will take them out of the top spot. Sorry to disappoint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcturus Jefferson Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 I may have sworn to troll Murder Inc till their ears fall off, but I have to object to this. Forced disbandment? Eternal ZI across rerolls? Heck, that's too serious for CN:S, let alone TE. If Judgment tries that, I may have to start spying FOR Murder Inc. -Bama Are you seriously whining about fighting in Tournament Edition? If a nation, new or not, changes its AA to "Murder, Inc." it will be on the receiving end of plenty of ordinance. TE is played to kill things. Jeez. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreedomvilleAT Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 (edited) Okay But I feel as an experienced CN and CNTE player I should inform you, no amount of NS that you might be able to knock of MI will take them out of the top spot. Sorry to disappoint. Experienced? Um, you're talking to a total veteran. I've been playing CN since early 2006. I played in the second most significant alliance in CN:S history. If anyone needs to school me, it won't be you. You don't need to "inform" me about anything but yes it will take them out of top spot. No one cares how many nations you have unless you are STRONG. I have a "top 10" thread anyway, that most of us will keep up to date. They may be #1 for a while because of their size but size means nothing. Edited December 10, 2008 by FreedomvilleAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingDingaLing Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 I may have sworn to troll Murder Inc till their ears fall off, but I have to object to this. Forced disbandment? Eternal ZI across rerolls? Heck, that's too serious for CN:S, let alone TE. If Judgment tries that, I may have to start spying FOR Murder Inc. -Bama Comparing rerolls here to ones in SE is whats ridiculous. If you didn't hit them after they rerolled then they would just reroll then hit you as this is a pretty constant war game. Eternal ZI would be to keep the war going past update, and I'm sure no one is calling for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyangel Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 (edited) PornStar members very happy with this. . . sorry i must go. .2 hours again i must quit from forum and lunch with ubercon member lol Edited December 10, 2008 by flyangel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Compound Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 I'd like to thank the three attackers who thought attacking me would be successful. I gained money both by means of defending and attacking, and the sad thing is...two of the people attacking me are MoW's for the alliances involved. Good show, good show. And Oh my! I'm still not in anarchy. Glad to see the efficiency of this united front at it's best. Heads of military failing to anarchy one target? Nonsense that could never happen! HAHA, im glad to see that you have surendered. And oh yea, not in anarchy? i would check your nation again. have fun in the prison camps, heard there a blast! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BastardofGod Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 HAHA, im glad to see that you have surendered. And oh yea, not in anarchy? i would check your nation again. have fun in the prison camps, heard there a blast! Yes be sure to enjoy the cake and pie and the trampoline but I'd beware of that teeter totter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternus Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 (edited) HAHA, im glad to see that you have surendered. And oh yea, not in anarchy? i would check your nation again. have fun in the prison camps, heard there a blast! Coming from someone in anarchy and hasn't attacked me since the initial blitz I'd say you have no room to talk. Way to fill my war-slot from somebody who could've used it! EDIT: And I've avoided anarchy for three days of attacks from three attacks, all higher NS than me and wasn't anarchied until now, you were anarchied the first night. Edited December 10, 2008 by Aeternus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gantanX Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 (edited) Coming from someone in anarchy and hasn't attacked me since the initial blitz I'd say you have no room to talk. Way to fill my war-slot from somebody who could've used it!EDIT: And I've avoided anarchy for three days of attacks from three attacks, all higher NS than me and wasn't anarchied until now, you were anarchied the first night. Nevermind Edited December 10, 2008 by gantanX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisK Owns You Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 Way to fill my war-slot from somebody who could've used it! I lol'd :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternus Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 I lol'd :lol: Lol'ing is good for the e-abs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seixas Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 (edited) They may be #1 for a while because of their size but size means nothing. An experienced player saying this? Think what you want, but the winning this round will take a lot more than just destroying some infra and therefore NS, you'll see; numbers mean more than you think. No need to argue here just look at Roman Empire. You notice that even with over 70% of their population in anarchy and despite the fact that they have 30K NS LESS than TUF, we are almost 2 full points behind them. Think on just why that is for a while and you can get back to me... Edited December 10, 2008 by seixas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisK Owns You Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 An experienced player saying this? Think what you want, but the winning this round will take a lot more than just destroying some infra and therefore NS, you'll see; numbers mean more than you think. No need to argue here just look at Roman Empire. You notice that even with over 70% of their population in anarchy and despite the fact that they have 30K NS LESS than TUF, we are almost 2 full points behind them.Think on just why that is for a while and you can get back to me... Dude I will say one thing... Your alliance has a bad Avg. NS. That is all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreedomvilleAT Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 (edited) An experienced player saying this? Think what you want, but the winning this round will take a lot more than just destroying some infra and therefore NS, you'll see; numbers mean more than you think. Wow. If I destroy an alliance's NS then they are no longer a threat whether or not they have 300+ nations. Yes, they could easily reroll and build up but that's what everyone is going to do when the war is over. "Numbers" do mean a lot but the number of nations in your alliance only count if the nations are strong. You could have a 90 nation alliance and all of them could be under 1k in NS. Yes, they have a lot of members but if the nations are weak...then there is no threat. Size means nothing. A 50 nation alliance with nations 1k+ could easily take them down despite their size. Edited December 10, 2008 by FreedomvilleAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seixas Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 Dude I will say one thing... Your alliance has a bad Avg. NS. That is all Lol, k, I'll say one thing back. Sccooooreboard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreedomvilleAT Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 (edited) Lol, k, I'll say one thing back.Sccooooreboard LOL you think you're good, don't you? On the ACTUAL scoreboard [where not only # of nations count] you are #6 in the top 10. Your alliance's NS is 131,319 while NAAW is around 184,461. We're in the top 3 alliances in this game therefore, don't remind hisk about the scoreboard. Edited December 10, 2008 by FreedomvilleAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seixas Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 You can say that, but the winner of this round will have the most members, even if that membership is decimated. Plain and simple... That's how you win in CNTE and I'm just saying it will be really funny if you the opposing forces win the battles, but loose the war and MI gets the last laugh cause they still win the round. After all these attacks, MI still sits over 13 points above MHA and 13 points alone would put an alliance above the third ranked GDA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Rocker Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 I'm still fighting the good fight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panic King Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 You can say that, but the winner of this round will have the most members, even if that membership is decimated. Plain and simple...That's how you win in CNTE and I'm just saying it will be really funny if you the opposing forces win the battles, but loose the war and MI gets the last laugh cause they still win the round. After all these attacks, MI still sits over 13 points above MHA and 13 points alone would put an alliance above the third ranked GDA. At the rate they are dropping ns that will be only 4 more days at the top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreedomvilleAT Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 (edited) You can say that, but the winner of this round will have the most members, even if that membership is decimated. Plain and simple...That's how you win in CNTE and I'm just saying it will be really funny if you the opposing forces win the battles, but loose the war and MI gets the last laugh cause they still win the round. After all these attacks, MI still sits over 13 points above MHA and 13 points alone would put an alliance above the third ranked GDA. No. No one actually will go by the display all alliances page to determine who wins. The person with the largest stats all around excluding the nation # will win. It's not like they announce winners on this game, it's whoever is the strongest by the reset. I have a topic of top 10 and all through this round you will see alliances change in ranks. By the end we will know the true winners. Also, we know of members that are already leaving Murder Inc. On the NAAW forums, we have people registering with their previous alliance as "Murder Inc." You can't tell how many members they will have by the end of the round so let's wait and see. Edited December 10, 2008 by FreedomvilleAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seixas Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 Congrats on creating that topic and all, but yes, I think I'll go by the alliance score formula that the creators specifically created to rank alliances lol. And if you don't, that's cool, whatever makes you feel better. By this logic my nation finished first place last round cause if I sort the nation list by tech... I had the most!!! Woot!!! lol, come on... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts