magicninja Posted February 10, 2013 Report Share Posted February 10, 2013 You need to come out of hippie before that can happen. And your side needs to stop our bigs before that will happen. RIA will get it's day eventually. Your little spy escapades and one war are not too high of a priority at this point but way to hide your 4 nations that could have hit us up top though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeroofTime55 Posted February 10, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2013 And your side needs to stop our bigs before that will happen. RIA will get it's day eventually. Your little spy escapades and one war are not too high of a priority at this point but way to hide your 4 nations that could have hit us up top though. Every alliance gets their day for the crimes they are complicit in. Perhaps one day in the future, RIA will pay up for whatever new misdeeds we will have done. But today? No, today is your day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicninja Posted February 10, 2013 Report Share Posted February 10, 2013 Every alliance gets their day for the crimes they are complicit in. Perhaps one day in the future, RIA will pay up for whatever new misdeeds we will have done. But today? No, today is your day. How are you losing the fight with Newwy? He's even keeping up with the other nation on him......no comment on RIA choosing to hide their few bigger nations instead of making us pay eh? Thought so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeroofTime55 Posted February 10, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2013 How are you losing the fight with Newwy? He's even keeping up with the other nation on him......no comment on RIA choosing to hide their few bigger nations instead of making us pay eh? Thought so. I've personally never been too decent at war. My warchest was poor from dealing with you previously, my infra I view as expendable. Oh no, my numbers are lower now! And since our entire coalition rests on my ability to fight, it looks like we're screwed, despite outnumbering you 3-1. Even still, I have destroyed far more in this and the previous round of wars than the cost to myself. Mostly in destroy money spy ops. That, and I haven't been nuking people for the most part because I let people with more tech handle that. Meanwhile, I occasionally eat a nuke when my SDI lets one slip by. As far as the RIA nations that "aren't attacking WAE" or whatever? Uhm, sure. First of all, I appreciate the attempt to flip it around, but when over 2/3 of your alliance is hiding in hippie, you simply don't get to make fun of others for "hiding." Secondly, WAE isn't a priority target for RIA. Yes, we are at war with you. But our efforts are focused elsewhere, and I'm just doing my "smack people I don't like" thing while the rest of the alliance conducts a proper war. Because I'm a loose cannon, so my mates tell me. Life on the edge, bitches. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick1 Posted February 10, 2013 Report Share Posted February 10, 2013 I've personally never been too decent at war. My warchest was poor from dealing with you previously, my infra I view as expendable. Oh no, my numbers are lower now! And since our entire coalition rests on my ability to fight, it looks like we're screwed, despite outnumbering you 3-1. Even still, I have destroyed far more in this and the previous round of wars than the cost to myself. Mostly in destroy money spy ops. That, and I haven't been nuking people for the most part because I let people with more tech handle that. Meanwhile, I occasionally eat a nuke when my SDI lets one slip by. As far as the RIA nations that "aren't attacking WAE" or whatever? Uhm, sure. First of all, I appreciate the attempt to flip it around, but when over 2/3 of your alliance is hiding in hippie, you simply don't get to make fun of others for "hiding." Secondly, WAE isn't a priority target for RIA. Yes, we are at war with you. But our efforts are focused elsewhere, and I'm just doing my "smack people I don't like" thing while the rest of the alliance conducts a proper war. Because I'm a loose cannon, so my mates tell me. Life on the edge, bitches. Don't worry I like to argue with the mirror too, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicninja Posted February 10, 2013 Report Share Posted February 10, 2013 I've personally never been too decent at war. My warchest was poor from dealing with you previously, my infra I view as expendable. Oh no, my numbers are lower now! And since our entire coalition rests on my ability to fight, it looks like we're screwed, despite outnumbering you 3-1. Even still, I have destroyed far more in this and the previous round of wars than the cost to myself. Mostly in destroy money spy ops. That, and I haven't been nuking people for the most part because I let people with more tech handle that. Meanwhile, I occasionally eat a nuke when my SDI lets one slip by. As far as the RIA nations that "aren't attacking WAE" or whatever? Uhm, sure. First of all, I appreciate the attempt to flip it around, but when over 2/3 of your alliance is hiding in hippie, you simply don't get to make fun of others for "hiding." Secondly, WAE isn't a priority target for RIA. Yes, we are at war with you. But our efforts are focused elsewhere, and I'm just doing my "smack people I don't like" thing while the rest of the alliance conducts a proper war. Because I'm a loose cannon, so my mates tell me. Life on the edge, bitches. Only we have no intention of sitting out the entire war which can't be said for your few big guys. My guys aren't hiding....they're waiting. Also, only you could come up with excuses as to why you are losing to a nation who should, by your estimates, stand 0 chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeroofTime55 Posted February 10, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2013 What estimates of that did I give? Can you provide a quote of me giving my personal odds on one of my individual wars? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicninja Posted February 10, 2013 Report Share Posted February 10, 2013 What estimates of that did I give? Can you provide a quote of me giving my personal odds on one of my individual wars? And since our entire coalition rests on my ability to fight, it looks like we're screwed, despite outnumbering you 3-1. Seems Newwy shouldn't be winning anything even against the likes of you. That he is...well that's just funny to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeroofTime55 Posted February 10, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2013 Work on the reading comprehension bro. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fireprincess59 Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 As Time has pointed out, we're obviously losing this war effort. . . You know, despite dealing more damage to the other side than they are dealing to us. :( And being able to get our nations in and out of peace mode effectively. Oh, and lets not forget our ability to quickly and easily rebuild after the war effort because our war chests are larger than your's are. :3 And the fact that CoJ has been reduced to attempting to get our Applicants to not join us and, instead, join the GPA. :3 But it's k. I'll wait for your "big plan." You know, that thing you should have that would let you win the war that you guys obviously don't have but pretend you do anyway. Oh. But wait. The Democracy is evil, right? Dictatorships, on the other hand, are the real good guys. . . And good always triumphs over evil, right? :3 But we're obviously doomed to lose! Especially now that you reveal our 10k NS allies have such horrible nations and war chests. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicninja Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 Work on the reading comprehension bro. I read you suck, but your coalition has 3:1 odds. That tells me even if you suck Newwy should stand no chance yet he's beating you handily. I mean unless you really are THAT bad. That makes this display in this thread even more pathetic than it already was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krashnaia Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 Given our experience with the mercy board handling a bunch of petulant children, I would say yes. Despite all that experience and all that mercy boarding, your children aren't showing much progression. Maybe you should change your teaching methods. Or just expel them from your AA. I know that would mean disbanding yourselves, but when a teaching method has proven inneficient, one must give up and move on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sardonic Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 Despite all that experience and all that mercy boarding, your children aren't showing much progression. Maybe you should change your teaching methods. Or just expel them from your AA. I know that would mean disbanding yourselves, but when a teaching method has proven inneficient, one must give up and move on. Swing and a miss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burnsey Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 I've personally never been too decent at war. Not the only thing you're not too decent at. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeroofTime55 Posted February 11, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 I read you suck, but your coalition has 3:1 odds. That tells me even if you suck Newwy should stand no chance yet he's beating you handily. I mean unless you really are THAT bad. That makes this display in this thread even more pathetic than it already was. I can't even tell you all the things wrong with this post. It's making my head spin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frederico Rodriguez Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 (edited) Voted Worst Poster Ever (2011) Trying to reclaim the 2013 prize this year I see. Edited February 11, 2013 by Frederico Rodriguez Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicninja Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 I can't even tell you all the things wrong with this post. It's making my head spin. Of course you can't. I'll get you a young priest and an old priest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordliam Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 Of course you can't. I'll get you a young priest and an old priest. He said you're outnumbered 3 to 1, not that the odds are 3 to 1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frederico Rodriguez Posted February 16, 2013 Report Share Posted February 16, 2013 He said you're outnumbered 3 to 1, not that the odds are 3 to 1. So the odds are more like 2:1 ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.