TehChron

[quote name='potato' timestamp='1286904554' post='2482599'] You could and should be part of it but, in my opinion (and I know you'll agree), you don't have the brains on your side to mount to anything: look at the logs from #stratego... [/quote] All that'd needed is for me to hijack control, and set things up, and Im sure I can put together a long-term strategy capable of sending you all back to the dog house. No idle boast right there, we Sith have enough brains to more than make up for any deficits elsewhere.

[quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1286903074' post='2482574'] You have your "reasons", and you think their great, but you won't share them, then you mock the person who disagrees with you. You're not full of cleverness, you're full of hubris. It if the screenshots are a ruse, then why did you make out VE as refusing your entry, make yourselves out to be untrustworthy, and are denying it now? [/quote] Because it's funny to watch others get hyped up on possible Dramallamas without even considering the context of what they're presented with. Those screenshots threw up so many red flags about their credibility that Im honestly shocked people took them seriously to begin with. Seriously, you fell right for it. Anyway, nice to see the bloc finally announced, even if it really does retain the somewhat uninspired name.

Oh I care.

[quote name='Sooner' timestamp='1286750845' post='2480692'] For you to talk about a lack of human decency, you really don't know VE nor GOONS. Stop pretending you know how our respective alliances work. You were never a member of either alliance. Your speculation is nothing but mindless dribble and drool. And don't talk like you never manufactured a CB against an alliance. [b] Or did you forget about GW3? And lastly, who gave you the right to decide who gets rolled or not? Yeah, no one.[/b] [/quote] I like how in your entire point to counter RV's assertions about your alliance, you place blame for GW3 entirely upon RV's shoulders in an attempt to paint him as some kind of villain. And you then follow that up with some kind of ridiculous hint that you'll roll whomever you please. My point is, essentially, my only response could possibly be this: u mad?

Actually no I dont.

[quote name='Denial' timestamp='1286695040' post='2480235'] "GOONS force micro-alliances to disband, they are terrible!" "We must disband GOONS!" That's not an example of moral relativism, that's a textbook case of hypocrisy. [/quote] Did he say disband? I thought he just said "Destroy", with the context referring to the outcome of a military engagement. Or are you saying that if GOONS is ever in a losing war, it will very likely disband then and there?

I kinda just skimmed through it while thinking "god this is dumb god this is dumb WAIT PEGGY SAID THERE WAS NO AGREEMENT god this is dumb etc." Then there was this white static-y feeling and I blacked out for a minute.

[quote name='Denial' timestamp='1286684337' post='2480156'] I would point you towards pre-blue text and loyal Pacifican Rebel Virginia. Also, after the recent revelation that you have a clear goal of disbanding GOONS, I could point you towards current era Rebel Virginia as being disingenuous when bleating about morals. [/quote] Considering the subjective nature of morality, so long as Rebel Virginia's actions are in line with his personal beliefs, that it is impossible for him to be disingenuous when discussing morality on that "revelation" alone.

Eh, Ive got a headache after slogging through that. Although that may just be the insomnia.

[quote name='Londo Mollari' timestamp='1286683224' post='2480145'] This is FOOTBALL. However, due to rain, the kickoff has been rescheduled to happen in approximately 22 hours. Hope to see you there. [/quote] Looking forward to it. Since [ooc]your namesake[/ooc] already sets such a low standard, it should be impossible for you to fail at meeting our expectations. Looking forward to it.

rofl Sorry. But I had to.

Granted, but God that is a terrible way of measuring someone's intelligence.

Oh I know, but you only need one good shot to get the job done.

So would I, actually. Thanks for being a dick, whomever you are.

I like how you note that you won't be working any less hard to get your raiders in check as a result of this discussion having taken place. Because that was "absolutely" what I meant. But hey, you can't disprove the influence your eagerness to deny folks a CB will have on your finally reining in trigger-happy raiders in your alliance. And your analogy makes no sense, since I actually didnt move my goalposts at all.

No offense, but I dont think anyone would really care whether you did coup him or not. How about something more threatening and melodramatic? If there is someone that actually cares about the quoted, btw, I apologize for the fact that I overlooked your existence.

Sleep on it and finish on a high note.

*shrug* Well, it wouldn't be the first time folks in your alliance have slinged that accusation at me and then retreated from the discussion without backing it up.

I was more commenting on the degradation in quality of the commentary. Sometimes less is more? Brevity is king? I'm sure someone else can give a more specific critique than I can at this point anyway.

Well, if the express purpose is putting an end to the stuff that makes people consider you a threat to begin with, eliminating the threat of your perceived thuggery up until this point fulfills that condition, doesn't it? Kind of like how GOONS was able to beat this WCE without firing a shot, only since the involved parties realized it wasn't going to work out. Am I right?

He can't help it, he just thinks hes the most clever person in CN. All evidence to the contrary be damned.

Prove one instance of me straight up lying rather than getting two AAs mixed up.Go on. Im sure that with you can mine plenty of examples of my deceit and hypocrisy.

Ah, I see that your reading comprehension skills are lacking then. Well you didnt say there were going to be anymore parts, so I guess I have something to look forward to tomorrow.

NSO not doing things for great Justice?Unpossible. Hate doesn't show up spontaneously, you know. But I guess you could try the "lol jealous :trollface:" response, as cliched as it would be. Yes, because every single person in that channel appeared to be stupid regardless of how you framed those logs.Honestly, now you've gotten sloppy with this. What a letdown, considering I was expecting a grand finish from you.

Me too. The funny thing about having logs is that you literally dont have to leap to conclusions about what people meant, as you have their words right there.I only said you guys would simply piss off more people. Then again, if you stop doing the crap you've been doing to piss people off to begin with, thus denying people a justification for activating treaties, you'll only enable this WCE to win in the end. Without firing a shot, I may add.