Guido

That doesn't make any sense. Why would member stay in NPO while getting pounded, but leave afterwards? They know the NPO can't kill them at the moment because they have their hands full...

The NPO has always use peacemode as a tactic, it is no different now than it was then.

I must say this is rather disappointing. The only thing you could come up with is that we have people in peace mode? Not even a forum SS? I usually enjoy these.

I can read just fine thank you. But these terms are kind of like if I wanted to post my own terms for the NPO POWs. I would much prefer to hear from the leaders of each alliance, because then it is credible...not just someone unofficially speaking for the group. Not that I would surrender, I'm just pointing out how this doesn't seem very official at all.

Too complicated for you or something? Heh.

So the unofficial group is offering unofficial surrender terms that aren't officially accepted by any actually alliance and may not be officially acknowledged. Sounds Legit to me.

1,509,987 Attacking + 590,127 Defending = 2,100,114 Casualties Casualty Rank: Ranked #78 of 30,035 Nations (0.26%)

So you are bragging about the fact that you are amazingly immature and know how to spam? AWESOME I SAY!

One thing that I have found over the last few months is that there is an amazing amount of hate towards the NPO and it's members, when in fact most people don't know most of us. Pretty hypocritical if you ask me considering most of these same people whine and complain when an alliance is judged based on the merits of their leaders...but feel it is ok to hate ALL of the NPO based on what they think is wrong behavior. Everyone I have met in the NPO is really nice and sure there are a few bad apples that eventually end up quitting in a fit of rage and capital letters..but that goes for any alliance really. Also, you would miss the NPO if it disbanded...not that it will.

Just curious...but isn't this the very thing that you claim is so terrible about us? You say that forcing alliances to pay reps rather than get white peace is what makes us terrible people...and yet you wouldn't do the same for us? How's that hypocrisy for you...

I must say this is surprising but a welcomed response. We know MK stands by their friends.

I think it is funny that this thread has been posted before the war is even close to being won. I think you vastly underestimate what will come out of the NPO as far as extremists go...kind of like FAN had a hardcore 50-70 people...do you think the NPO doesn't have the same?

I would say that they don't have to ask the NPO's permission to play, but actions have reactions. Things that you do have consequences. And they are playing under those terms. So what is the motivation for an alliance to allow someone that they believe to still be out to hurt them, to have a chance to do so? If they keep the status quo, no harm comes to them, if they change it, the possibility of harm exists...so why change it?

So you are implying that I am not a decent human being? Interesting way to completely flame someone that you do not even know, OOC, in an IC forum that has nothing to do with this. It certainly helps me see your point of view and really mull over your opinion in my head. Anyone else that would actually like to discuss my post respectfully, feel free to do so.

I think you sort of have to look at this in a pro and con sense. What con's are there to remaining at war with FAN? Not many if any at all...what pro's are there? None, if any at all as long as they are all in peace mode. So why change the status quo? There is no driving force to do so. I'm not stating this from an NPOer's point of view, this is the case with anything really...

lol, very funny and well played. And setting the forums and post up probably took all of 10 minutes...

LOL, haven't seen this much crying in a while. And to us being the worst alliance in the game... *Well that's just like your opinion, man...* Comon name the movie...

The Myth that you will never "Catch up"...whatever that means...is just that, a myth. I started the game almost 400 days into it and my peak rank is like 51 or something. So many idiots play this game that you can pass easily. So many people pick wars with the wrong people and get destroyed. With some strategy and a few donation deals you can be in nuke range in no time. And a restart would make me quit as well.

There are so many petty and childish reports in that forum that it bogs down the process for reports that actually need to be looked at. I wouldn't be surprised if the Mod team took a vacation just to get away from that forum alone lol.

If you are honestly moving, then there won't be a problem at all. I have accessed my nation from a University public computer multiple times and never had a problem...that was back before I really knew what I was doing. Admin can tell who are really multi's and cheaters and who aren't. IF you aren't, you will be fine.

The academy exams given by most alliance are also extremely easy and can be done in less than 15 to 20 minutes. So it's not like an exam for school we are talking aobut.

It really depends on your exact situation. I made my nation at college and logged in from my dorm and never got deleted, I even logged in from lab computers multiple times and never had a problem. Admin uses other things than just IP to tell if you are cheating. Most likely they can see the address is a large university. So as long as you don't trade/aid/war with anyone on your network, you SHOULD be fine. But you are still taking a risk by doing it, but logging in once every 14 days doesn't sound like much fun, so if it's between that and logging in, I would do it and take the chance. But that's just me.

You shouldn't be collecting during war anyway so anarchy usually doesn't effect you at all. Except you can't declare any wars.

It really depends what he wants to do though. Even thought the Pentagon + WRC allow you to destroy more of your enemies infra/tech and give you a better chance of doing so, it also doesn't help you survive against an enemy with a sufficient war chest. Whereas the CIA allows you to hold out longer as far as nukes are concerned. Just depends what kind of war he expects to be fighting. IMO though the WRC and CIA are both #1 and #2 goals on your list...the order is up to you.

Yeah A CIA is a must have for a nation your size. That and the SDI make for a very good protective barrier.