Levonscott

It is my understanding that material was uncovered that demonstrates breaches of those other clauses, that occured during the duration of the NAP. However, these were not discovered until after the NAP expired, on the 1st of January. Thus, as I said, I feel (at least for NG), Clause 3 should have been utilised - even if the NAP had expired - since they occured during that time. From a strictly legal sense, however...?

As far as I'm aware, the NAP extension lapsed on the 1st of January, so fulfilling Clause 3 was not a legal requirement. Frankly, I do find myself disappointed that this was not done anyway, but I was only the drafter of the NAP, not MoFA. The powers that be have their reasoning. In any case, good luck and have fun, all. When the ashes clear, may we try yet another NAP?

As you can tell, GATO definitely had its hands on the drafting pen!

A thorough and inclusive document. I hope this peace lasts far beyond the 180 days! o/