Jump to content

Perceus

Members
  • Posts

    127
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Perceus

  1. [quote name='Ravnica' timestamp='1340259737' post='2991566'] You are literally in one war against a slightly inactive player. This is not "burning more of your guys". Might want to stop while you're behind... I'm pretty sure your blustering is making someone facepalm right now. [/quote] please do provide more targets that aren ot already taken or on peacemode and I'll take a swing at them. and "slightly inactive" well my friends over at INV, who are occupying his other two slots tell me he has not attacked since they started so, if that is "slightly" over at MK, I can only imagine what a fully inactive looks like.
  2. [quote name='Seerow'] Low tier nation complaining about low tier nations sucking, while still pretending like what goes on in those tiers matters in the least. [/quote] well, Im sorry, see in NATO, no tier sucks. now if thats not the case in MK and your low tier nations suck, well, what a great kingdom you guys have! That, my friend, is laughable.
  3. [quote name='Seerow' timestamp='1340259101' post='2991550'] Your alliance has a good 10 or so nations in my range, they just all happen to be in peace mode. I'm sure we can work out something. If you're expecting the guys I hit to bring me down to your range anytime soon, we'll be waiting for that fight for a long time. Edit: Also lol@the implication that 44k is 'mid tier' range. [/quote] its ok, I can burn more of your guys while I wait, just go on hiding them now and seeing as they dont even fight back, I dont even have to worry about dropping myself. edit: call it what you like, you boys really are good at playing the words game and not getting the message of it. The point is, I'll be waiting right there.
  4. [quote name='Seerow' timestamp='1340258465' post='2991534'] Well as much as I appreciate it, please send out the people who actually fight. I already had one boring round from CSN, I was kind of hoping for some more here. [/quote] The same over to your side, seriously, I go on all happy declaring on my target only to find out he is not fighting back? what afraid of the fire or something? such a shame, was looking forward to that casualty count increase. When your guys start to fight back, let me know, I'll go take a nap in the meantime.
  5. [quote name='Seerow' timestamp='1340258885' post='2991544'] No, it was already stated outright twice it was not his target. On the other hand I have 3 open slots. Please, take advantage of them. [/quote] oh how I wish I could! but dont worry, I'll be waiting here for you, once you drop down to the mid tier range, I'll gladly dance with you.
  6. [quote name='rsoxbronco1' timestamp='1340258612' post='2991540'] And what big ghosts you have! 9k tech and 88k NS. And he's so sweet to be sending growth aid and signing bonuses out to an alliance he's not even a member of. EDIT: Well, Flak, I did have a smaller CSN nation try to surrender on day 3, but he was only around 10k NS at the start of the war, not 90K. [/quote] and this is your target yes? because unfortunately your slots were filled, so no NATOan could engage you. Too bad, such a shame.
  7. [quote name='Seerow' timestamp='1340257705' post='2991507'] Not my fault the only three guys in your whole alliance above 72k NS not in peace mode don't have planes. I mean things like that seem to be more of a pattern than a "Oh hey I hit the lottery". I mean, they were intended to be out of peace mode and attacking, not just grossly inactive right? It's not like you guys would declare war while intending to hide EVERY nation of a meaningful strength level from participating... [/quote] oh you mean THOSE three, yeah no that was on purpose, we wanted to be fair and give YOU specifically a head start. [quote name='rsoxbronco1']Well I must say, NATO has been quite impressive this war. You almost made it 2 full hours without one of your members trying to surrender.[/quote] boy oh boy, you caught a ghost! Thank you very much for the ghost busting, now would you like a cookie for that?
  8. [quote name='Seerow' timestamp='1340257388' post='2991493'] So I'm curious does NATO have a policy against keeping planes during peace time, or did I just get lucky with both nations I hit? [/quote] we don't believe in flying. The only thing we accept flying is our nukes. Duh! Ofcourse you got lucky! feel privileged about it, doesnt happen quite often.
  9. [quote name='Quiziotle' timestamp='1340256720' post='2991480'] Indeed there is; the screams of the LSF echo throughout these halls because, instead of defending them, NATO made the decision to attack us. [/quote] I dont see anyone bearing the LSF banners crying like MK is right now. [quote name='LittleRena'] IRON are an ally of NPO NATO are an ally of NPO NATO didn't attack IRON because they are an ally of NPO Question answered, can we move on?[/quote] thank you! someone actually has braincells.
  10. [quote name='Blacky' timestamp='1340256011' post='2991464'] Kinda sweet that they chose us to be their last war. NATO doesn't have much left in them, so it's good that they're going out with a bang. Really, watching broken-backed alliances like this just fading into obscurity isn't the right way to go out, never was really. Have fun guys! And try to remember to send somebody my way! [/quote] last war? broken-backed alliance? faded? I think you must be talking about some other alliance, go on by our forums, you'll find them more lively and active than probably half the others on Bob.
  11. [quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1340254618' post='2991411'] Man, I feel like NATO hasn't DoW'ed in a lonnnnng time (I have no idea if this is true or not). Kind of feels neat to see. [/quote] we have, last time a global war broke we were part of it too! defending NPO, and the time before as well, when we couldnt defend NPO because the other side maneuvered its way into having us not being able to help our allies. Its just that that was a long time ago haha
  12. [quote name='Banksy' timestamp='1340253886' post='2991364'] *looks at the empty slots in our upper tier* says the guy from NATO, with every nation above 90NS in PM. TACTICALLY there is one more war now but he's attacking a ghost. [/quote] I dont care about the nations above 90k NS, I care about the ones under, those are the ones I can hit! Please let them come out to play, I promise I'll only send them to ZI.
  13. [quote name='tamerlane' timestamp='1340254239' post='2991384'] Maybe if this happened 4 years ago, now its just laughable. This war gets better by the day... [/quote] but four years ago I would not have gotten to burn your pixels you see. So it is now.
  14. [quote name='Quiziotle' timestamp='1340253866' post='2991363'] Reminder that the LSF, your MDoAP partner, was attacked earlier today and you are hitting us instead of defending them. [/quote] oh dont worry, its in our desk at the chambers over at NATO, I have it on a post it personally. Thanks for the reminder though.
  15. [quote name='cookavich' timestamp='1340252131' post='2991244'] i feel honored that nato thought highly enough of me to devote 10% of their elite blitz strike team against my nation [/quote] too bad I was not one of them, then you would have had 100% of our elite blitz strike team against your nation.
  16. [quote name='Brehon' timestamp='1340251147' post='2991188'] You know the NPO cannot support you on one side and TLR/GATO/NG on the other. This is why I asked you to stay out. I understand your want, but this is the wrong move. We, NPO, put out our statement. This would allow our allies to stay on a side, even if it meant staying out. Simply put, as you already know, I am disappointed. Not because you are doing what you want, but because you are falling into a death trap that could be avoided. Directly you have caused us to have two M levels in the same conflict. [/quote] There is no such thing as death trap, in a year NATO will be back at its pre-war levels if not higher, our members will still be here, our community will still be there, tight and strong as always. Most importantly our honor will still be there. This was not a decision that was taken lightly or for the sheer want of having a piece of MK, but NATO has a principle of not letting its allies out to dry, much less a MDoAP pact, when they have only fulfilled their duties as well. We understand NPO's concerns and the difficult position in which it puts it, and we sought to minimize it, by avoiding any allies of allies (TLR, GATO, NG). instead we went for the aggresor, and the one who is not allied to NPO. That is not something that can be said of the other side, which used ghost declarations and had alliances attack alliances which their own allies had a link to. nonetheless, I am still one of the most ardent NPO supporters so o/ NPO o/ NATO We Ride to War! Call up your banners!
  17. Good luck to Brehon, may he continue taking NPO to great new heights. And a bow to Mary for doing such an outstanding job!
  18. the point is, FAN is still gave in even while they did not admit defeat, otherwise they would still be out there trying to cripple the lower tier but not being very succesful considering their lower tiers were too busy with NATO and TPF and a good majority of those were already on ZI. "defeat admission" or not the performance of the war marks the victor.
  19. 6 years, damn that shows quality in it of itself, congrats!
  20. nice line up! Congrats! Glad to see democracy always delivers the same leaders...coincidentally =P haha jk. Good luck and to many more years
  21. [quote name='Chief Savage Man' timestamp='1328036428' post='2911617'] this is basically what is happening [/quote] isnt it what it always happens here in the OWF?
×
×
  • Create New...