Jump to content

Exige

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    317

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Blog Comments posted by Exige

  2. Penkala

    Posted

    Oh PLEASE. It was QUITE clear that GR would be on our side. The point is, there are more of DT's allies on our side, and DT knew it. They chose to *disregard this* and join the war not to defend allies (which would have landed them on OUR side of the war) but to take a pot shot at our side of the war.

    Anyone who thought GR would remain neutral is not worthy of discussing this topic with me and should exit my blog immediately.

    1) than GR shouldn't have told them that they didn't intend to stay neutral. Cause I don't know how relationships work on "your side" between allies. But on my side, when an ally ask me what I intend to do, I don't tell them that I intend to stay neutral if I actually plan on joining a side. And with GR going on the offense after DT got attacked, it's GR that chose not to defend allies but pick a side, not DT. Once again you are a great PR guy for your side. You claim that DT chose not to defend allies and thereby not ending up on your side, but who should they have defended? Brigade didn't got attacked, NV got attacked but NOIR prevented intervention, Valhalla wasn't in the war, GR told them that they would stay neutral. LoSS was the first NOIR involved and asked for help. Anyone who thinks that DT didn't have a solid CB doesn't even deserve to have a blog on this forum

    1) I believe they had a treaty chain that fell through at the last moment, but I'm not sure about the details.

    2) So what? DT attacked the side treaties obligated it to defend. Based on a color treaty. Sucks for DT!

    3) The reps are not 'enormous' and DT was willing and able to pay them.

    4) CSN was only asking 10k from DT in total, and 30k from any other source. No stipulation upon who from the alliance can pay them.

    1) LoSS attacked hydra who only has treaties with SLCB and NSO. so they didn't have one, unless you make a chain of several alliance and than you could also find a MDoAP chain for DT to attack legacy if you go beyond 2 steps.

    2) still drunk? who got attacked? Do you consider NV to be on your side now or what?

    3) yes ofcourse and the entire OWF agrees on it, both your allies and your opponents all think these reps are deserved

    4)not in the beginning, and that's what got CSN to get dragged thru the mud on the OWF. they wanted 40k tech from the 2ktech+ nations

  3. Penkala

    Posted

    It's 3:30AM saturday night and I had some drinks but you penkala seem to have had way more too drink.

    what's this !@#$%^&* about DT not activating the GR treaty but chosing to enter the other side. DT enterred this war before GR attacked or got attacked by anyone. Actually CSN declared on DT before GR got involved, so shouldn't it be GR defending DT? You are quite the PR guy for your side aren't you?

    and if you are so worried about CSN's OWF reputation, than you should have told CSN:

    1) too not declare on LOSS without any treaty

    2) be the only alliance so far to ask reps instead of white peace

    3) to not ask for enormous reps

    4) to not ask DT's top layer to pay that huge amount

    I have seen CSN members to post their disagreement about their leadership, I have seen DT-haters supporting DT in this, I have seen your allies and even people from your own alliance to support DT in this, I have seen a !@#$ load of neutrals choose DT's side. Thank God that you are here to tell us that DT deserves these or even higher reps because people may have thought otherwise if you weren't here to show us the light with your moronic arguments.

    If there is anyone coming close to deserving to pay 40K reps than it's CSN because of their pathetic attack on LoSS with any treaty chain and without a real CB. Hell and even they shouldn't pay the tech with their 2ktech+ nations

  4. oOoMidooOo

    Posted

    I expect germany to do rather well.

    Bayern Munchen played with 5 germans in starting line-up of champions league final and were the better team all round. The injury of Michaël Ballack is a big setback for them tho.

    Nord Korea will be ugly duck of the tournament, all 3 opponents outclass them by far. But they don't deserve to be in the world cup anyway. the should make qualifications global, there are european and south american countries that are way better than some who are in the world cup but they always have to qualify against way stronger teams. If this means that 85% of the countries qualifying would be european and south american, than so be it, at least we'll see the best 32countries

×
×
  • Create New...