Jump to content

Mistress Demona

Members
  • Posts

    77
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mistress Demona

  1. [quote name='Confusion' timestamp='1291482022' post='2530037'] Anyways, then I ask myself, Why couldn't Warriors just gone against TPC alone? (Note: I'm not saying this war is unfair etc.) I have a feeling TPC will prevail. o/ TPC Confusion. [/quote] Payback Against TPC - from the Kiwis with love. At least that's MY motivation. I know, not very Kiwi of me
  2. [quote name='ADude' timestamp='1291443337' post='2529820'] close to a week. anyways in all honesty you probably should have only attacked TPC. Also this is tW, WAPA and TFK Vs TPC, tF and FARK. (in case you didn't notice) [/quote] This is correct. We weren't organized enough to figure out what we wanted to do with the DoW - leaders (including myself) missed on the communication in this particular case.
  3. [quote name='Frostfirefox' timestamp='1291262991' post='2527742'] [size="5"][b]Old war system[/b][/size] [b]War length[/b] - As long as it takes to do the job or be defeated trying. [b]War strategy[/b] - The enemy might have secret allies so we better be ready for a heavy counterattack and make sure our friends are ready as well just in case. [b]War tactics[/b] - If we are ZI'd re roll and re declare ASAP. Prevent the opponent from re rolling by keeping the ZI'd opponents with at least 1 active war. [b]War reason[/b] - These guys are doing this and it does not fly with us. So we are going to go to war until they change or are destroyed/disbanded. [b]War profit[/b] - Depends on war scenario. [b]War peace[/b] - We aren't going to give them peace until they do what we want. Either they surrender or we do. Victory or death! [size="1"]edit: if you didn't catch my drift, i think things are based on casualties to much. [/size] [/quote] Go for it, people - if that's the kind of system you want. It's not like I haven't experienced exactly this previously so no hurt feelings on my part.
  4. Well, that's a rather nice 1 month birthday present to wake up to. + 2 while in anarchy. I'd like to apologize to my attackers. I'm afraid I'm not going to be much of a challenge. If your alliance waited a day, probably could do better. But all your going to get out of me this time is a bunch of annoyed soldiers clashing against an army 2X their size. In other words, *I* get the statistics. Oh well, make sure your leaders plan better next time.
  5. I'm aware of several instances where the opposite is true as well. I've helped a half dozen or so non-aligned (who later joined the group I was in), and the best report was not favorable.
  6. Does your alliance? Does NSO have a list of people who are able to be attacked at any time by any member if the member so chooses - regardless of what the term is called.
  7. Hello Sardonic, I'm X nation and you're raiding me. I'm not a valid target any more - just letting you know since I'm free to stop being attacked. Thank you.
  8. GOONS spin: "Myth: All tech raided nations must go through the mercy board to secure peace. Reality: The mercy board is one of many options a raid target has, it is a path rarely taken." --------------- Reality: I have helped half a dozen nations being tech raided. EVERY time when I or the nation being attacked has asked nicely for the raid to end the GOONS person attacking has given the link to the mercy boards and said "go there" and has otherwise refused all requests. To NOT go through the boards is a path rarely GIVEN. GOONS Spin: "Myth: The mercy board is designed to embarrass people Reality: The mercy board is designed so that nations have an alternative to paying money to secure their peace. It is for the benefit of our enemies that we have the mercy board, or else we wouldn't have any way to solve our differences besides monetary means." Reality: So a nation attacked by a GOON is supposed to pay the GOON to end the attack? NICE EXTORTION RING!!! If the "mercy board" was ONLY used in situations where the nation using the board STARTED the attack (like a nation "tech raided" a GOON - not the situation where a nation attacked BY a GOON fights back), your argument might have some merit. IF GOONS position is "raided nations do NOT have the right to fight back and IF they do then they have to either go to the mercy board OR pay us to leave them alone" - write a blog explaining that. OR do you require the GOON nation who attacked the other nation and started the war to go to the mercy board and paint pictures to get peace from his/her victim? (NOT) "Myth: The mercy board is the worst thing ever Reality: The mercy board can be fun for everyone involved, if you try not to take things so seriously. It just requires a little humility and work on your part." What it requires in the tech raid situation is the ability to kiss GOON butt. That's not the same thing as humility. You know, people who knew GOONS from previous days tell me this current version in no way equal in nastyness to the past. I use to think that was a bad argument. I've changed my view, partly from this spin attempt. GOONS don't have the ability to live up to your past because the cyberworld has changed, and you're afraid that if you didn't put a spin on your policies and try to convince people that they are "reasonable" - enough people would be outraged (as opposed to a few here and there) to be a real threat.
  9. [quote name='Clash' timestamp='1286642271' post='2479716'] They appear to have hit nearly everyone. Off the first two (10-nation) pages of their war screens, I see Parrot Pirates, Fellowship, AZTEC, Seige, Warriors (but of course!), The Flying Kiwis, TPC, FOK, FROGOUT, Duckroll, Ordo Paradoxia, Holy Britannian Empire and The War And Hate Bus. [/quote] On behalf of The Flying Kiwis, we are honored that Lafayette Escadrille considers some of our members worthy of their attention. Kiwis...take flight
  10. [quote name='Bob Janova' timestamp='1286538730' post='2478765'] I got a PM about it regarding my treaty web, which confirmed that it is cancelled. And yes, I really hate this new trend not to announce things, too. Remember GW2, and how the LUE-Fark MDP was invalid because nobody knew it existed? Or how everyone laughed at FAN when they threatened the world with secret treaties? That's the road you're going down – inter-alliance anarchy and the complete breakdown of the norms and procedures of global politics. Treaties only exist because people are notified about them, and about their cancellations. This forum acts as a global legal office and not to post your treaties and cancellations damages the whole system. [/quote] When something happens and affects an alliance with enough power to make a big deal about it, it will swing back the other way.
  11. [quote name='Unko Kalaikz' timestamp='1286001679' post='2472034'] You misunderstand. I never denied the presence of pride, having faced it as a former enemy of the Order; indeed that is the key weakness that the Enemy seized upon. [/quote] and this [quote name='Unko Kalaikz' timestamp='1285912903' post='2470828'] But the reason why so many embraced Order was because it was good sense, and the francoist policies that brought Pacifica security and prosperity spilled over to less gifted alliances who were eager to seek the light. [/quote] Keep working on the pride issue. [quote name='Quiziotle' timestamp='1285834179' post='2469562'] We defend them because, unlike most alliances in this game, they are not terrible. [/quote] The GOONS? Are we thinking of the same alliance? They certainly managed to fool me [quote name='snibbmaster' timestamp='1285991317' post='2471892']I'd lastly like to point out that while the discontent with GOONS grows (and some would say with good reason), MK's popularity has not been affected.[/quote] Well, no micro AA has decided to attack MK out of annoyance or revenge. If that's your standard of "popularity", I agree.
  12. [quote name='kriekfreak' timestamp='1285850365' post='2469673'] Ok can we stop with the "You are cowards, you don't fight them 1 on 1" line of reasoning please? It is inane and makes my stomach turn around. It is just as bad, if not worse, than "You are cowards, you hide in peace". [/quote] No one is saying GOONS should fight some sort of duel where everyone fights only one nation. The point is that they should be able to take care of two smaller alliances on their own. Not saying I agree in this case either. It's arguable when it was The Ninjas only - assuming they don't have a significant number of people waiting in other AA's to continue the fight later. However with both The Ninjas and Fnka? Yeah, GOONS would probably be crushed. Good thing they have chosen their allies well.
  13. [quote name='CEverettKoop' timestamp='1285830680' post='2469514'] They've got more guts than you'll ever know, coward. If you want some, bring it. [/quote] When was the last time the GOONS actually declared on an AA that, by their own charter, is an alliance? I do not pay much attention to politics, but I can't remember any time. If it's war you really want - find a real alliance with plenty of treaties and give it a go yourself. No? Than do the rest of us a favor and stop pointing fingers at everyone else.
  14. [quote name='Udelar Johnson' timestamp='1285740379' post='2467946'] By all means, continue to allow the alliances that answer your rallying call of "Roll GOONS!" to be cut down one by one. [/quote] Udelar has a point here. Some discipline and teamwork between the various alliances that take issue with GOONS would be nice. All giving in to the GOONS baiting does is provide them (and apparently their allies)an opportunity to get more of what they want - relatively easy wars based on numbers. I'm not saying The Ninjas are in any way unskilled warriors. However, IF even the past two groups who have declared on the GOONS had joined in one alliance - by GOONS standards - there would be no argument about the AA being an alliance. You would be granting them war and a win, so I'm not advocating this actually be done, but at least we wouldn't have to listen to alliance vs. not an alliance arguments.
  15. [quote name='Boywunda' timestamp='1285737612' post='2467810'] We were declared on only what half an hour ago? Most of our alliance is asleep or just not online. Our active members who are online did some declaring and before other GOONS can get online our friends asked for some fun too. We have friends, we're proud to have the friends we have and we won't deny our friends this kind of pleasure. Yet, we're "cowards" for allowing our friends to have some fun too. [/quote] Wasn't there a large alliance that got attacked withing the past few months by multiple other alliances who (like many other alliances probably would have done) could have had friends/allies declare on their behalf, had offers from allies to join and said *gasp* "no, stay out"? THAT was bravery! Compare that to this situation. GOONS have as much "right" to call it what they will as they have the "right" to say anything else, but I'm about as convinced that GOONS are not cowards as I am that an "alliance" must have 15 members or more to be an alliance. In other words, not at all!
  16. Declare peace. No reps. Issue solved. Yeah, you don't have to take my advice, but if you care enough about your alliance reputation to actually announce all this, it's what should happen.
  17. [quote name='Thomasj_tx' timestamp='1285511721' post='2465158'] We make it a practice to not attack an alliance that is already engaged if our entry would make it greatly unbalanced. [/quote] It's already unbalanced...just based on the groups they attacked...Roman Empire is about to fall On the other hand, we don't want to share the victory. Oh, and RE - I'm only fighting five of you at the moment. Please send one more over. Thank you. ---------------------------- Now, where did our generals put those spitballs???
  18. Are you sure you want to do this, Roman Empire? Our troops are battle hardened at this point - we're all still in our camos even
  19. Good admission of defeat - best i've seen yet. It was a nice surprise to wake up to - as was the declaration Nice fight. :salute:
  20. [quote name='Mandolus' timestamp='1285044535' post='2459647'] but in truth you guys were the most realistically challenging target I could find. Have fun! [/quote] We will try not to disappoint.
  21. To all United under Scorn members, Please do accept one of the invites that we all have been receiving to join one of our allies (or look for some other alliance) sometime between now and the end of July. I highly advise against going off on your own because SOMEONE will attack you (probably three on one) because that's just how Planet Bob is at the moment. Everyone else, I plan on sticking around until everyone in US is somewhere else. I already have plans once that's done. This has already been stated but I'm saying so again. We have a Mutual Defense and Optional Aggression Pact with The Sandwich Confederation. That's still in affect and does NOT have an expiration date on it. SC has a military treaty with Basketball Ninjas. BN has treaties with other alliances. Both our co-founders have moved to BN. I assume you all get the picture
  22. Thank you INT, CRAP and BN. We all appreciate your help. In truth, this is sudden to the membership as well. I plan to stick around until everyone else in United under Scorn is safely somewhere else. Good to know that we have support.
  23. [quote name='Clash' date='09 July 2010 - 12:03 AM' timestamp='1278651794' post='2364391'] How come it's always the Kiwis who get the love? /me jealous [/quote]
×
×
  • Create New...