Jump to content

SiCkO

Members
  • Posts

    798
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SiCkO

  1. [quote name='assarax' date='07 July 2010 - 11:59 AM' timestamp='1278529159' post='2362597'] That being said, it's really not fair to disparage an entire alliance for the actions of a few. If you're going to judge our alliance, get to know the other 99% before you come here and talk about things and make assumptions based off of nothing. [/quote] indeed assarax, you still have your charm after all these years
  2. [quote name='crazy canuck' date='06 July 2010 - 05:11 PM' timestamp='1278461474' post='2361787'] I am not sure that you can get more black and white then this. Berith broke the rules. TOP dealt with it the only way it could given the sacred law of the almighty Admin, who is second in power only to the God of Thunder and Rock and Roll. If you are implying that some other blasphemy ought to have been carried out contrary to the sacred law then I will pray for the souls of the citizens of your nation. I would encourage all other TOPers to steer clear of discussion of such a blasphemy or you may have to undergo the rite of purification. Feanor might enjoy such rites but I am sure no one else does. [/quote] what rites do you refer to?
  3. [quote name='Locke426' date='06 July 2010 - 04:26 PM' timestamp='1278458774' post='2361711'] Clearly, he would immediately move Pacifica to black. [/quote] that would be interesting
  4. [quote name='Locke426' date='06 July 2010 - 03:22 PM' timestamp='1278454944' post='2361585'] TOLWYN for Cortath [/quote] TOLWYN wants to conquer black not red Achron to Legion Watcher to MK both are solid leaders so it would be interesting to see how both do with differently styled alliances
  5. [quote name='The Arbiter' date='06 July 2010 - 04:16 PM' timestamp='1278458182' post='2361692'] SiCkO, i dislike you to death, but how many times are you gonna stick up for the OP's antics? [/quote] when you stop attacking people on IRC.
  6. Legion, i love you to death, but how many times are you gonna stick up for Arbiter's antics?
  7. thank you to our allies and C&G for your understanding.
  8. Ruler Name: SiCkO Nation Link: http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=388776 Resources: Iron/Rubber DO you need uranium?: Not at this moment Alliance: The Order of the Paradox Circle Interested in: Preferably with Fish/Wheat and yes i will switch to black
  9. Im willing to be Green I have Iron/Rubber Link: http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=388776
  10. This platform is curious how the SLCB has 100% activity.
  11. Logically, a sound course of action, this platform agrees with the action taken by Legion. We also wish UPN the best of luck.
  12. [quote name='Davian Thule' date='29 June 2010 - 10:00 PM' timestamp='1277874016' post='2354891'] Dammit TOP, come back here! [/quote] This is not something we can comply with ally.
  13. [quote name='Sandwich Controversy' date='29 June 2010 - 06:36 PM' timestamp='1277861753' post='2354658'] Fighting? You fought for like a week and then surrendered. We fought TOP for 3 months straight. It's a BIT different, even if we won. Our losses were huge, as anyone can tell you, and neither Karma nor the TOP-CnG War altered your standing right below the sanctioned alliances. You can hardly be said to have even fought in either. Us growing even slightly faster than you is quite embarrassing because you're twice our size, and your tiny nations should (heh, you might even say you have legions of them!!) grow much faster than our big ones. It's simple game mechanics. Oh, and I'm sorry about the viceroy you willingly accepted instead of fighting. You even tried to disband instead! Obviously, your alliance mattered that much. And even more hilariously, you then proceeded to sign MDoAPs with NPO and Valhalla. Some !@#$@#$ spine you have. Your reps were miniscule compared to what we paid after noCB (a war our allies did not start, even!), even in raw terms and not scaled up for your alliance's size. 40k is a pittance, much less than you deserved. This all took place after a year-long diplomatic blacklist and weekly threats from NPO and friends to attack us. Before [i]that[/i] came the Unjust War, which we also lost and had to pay reps because of. To add to this, you would have received white peace in the last war had you not had such incredible egos. You got white peace without a second thought in Karma. In both wars we lost, we had to fight hard to even get harsh reparations. In noCB we wouldn't have had terms at all if it wasn't for the work of Gre and MHA. I really wish you could have had the time we did. Stop !@#$@#$ whining. Thanks for asking. edit: You even said your viceroy did great things for your alliance, how horrid an alliance could you possibly be that a viceroy could [i]improve[/i] you [/quote] This platform is confused, the topic has mentioned nothing about The Legion's competence, merely, that it is standard to congratulate an alliance on achieving a powerful position. If you wish to complain, this platform suggests you post in a different thread.
  14. This platform does not understand the necessity for a change to the terms.
  15. [quote name='Banksy' date='29 June 2010 - 06:31 PM' timestamp='1277861500' post='2354649'] Then perhaps you could explain how that has anything to do with rebuilding the alliance.... [/quote] This platform would like to point out that statistically nations are far less likely to join an alliance that is not run by itself.
  16. [quote name='Seth Muscarella' date='29 June 2010 - 02:54 PM' timestamp='1277848435' post='2354393'] Congrats, Legion, with your sub-19k avg NS, and your 1 WRC for every 13 nations! You've got a pretty epic inactive low-tier now; it's good to see the 4 years of being an alliance has built you up so far! [/quote] take a look in the mirror, i think legion has earned its spot (purplegate, GW 3, Karma, PAIN - Universialis)
  17. [quote name='Lukcia' date='29 June 2010 - 09:46 AM' timestamp='1277829983' post='2354044'] As I remember, MK only got their most recent sanction after merging with someone. Well done Legion! [/quote] they just wanted to be special
  18. If you cant say something nice, go make your own thread, this is a congratulatory thread not a thread to show how immature you are.
  19. Face it Matt, you grand gamble failed and you are paying the price for refusing to back down, watching your alliance crumble and die
  20. Congrats to Legion on gaining sanction!
  21. [quote name='Matthew The Great' date='27 June 2010 - 01:10 PM' timestamp='1277669391' post='2352137'] I'm sorry but paying off 40k Tech is an inconvenience to our growth [/quote] chump change joking aside, congrats Legion, took you the better part of 3 years to return to your rightful spot.
  22. [quote name='SynthetiK' date='26 June 2010 - 12:00 PM' timestamp='1277578785' post='2351126'] why LEGION?? what of your brothers @ CIA. I hope you live forever [/quote] Legion has historically been close to MASH (multiple times they nearly merged) and so I don't think it's any reflection on your alliance, just that MASH has known Legion for a long while and that they felt more comfortable there.
  23. [quote name='Xiphosis' date='25 June 2010 - 08:52 PM' timestamp='1277524360' post='2350637'] Later MASH, can't say I'm sad to see more consolidation. /misses the uber-big alliances. [/quote] sorry but 1500 members is excessive
  24. Legion, you picked the right time to get a merger
  25. [quote name='Lord Fingolfin' date='25 June 2010 - 08:39 PM' timestamp='1277523565' post='2350617'] Knock a year off of that, Sept. 2007 [/quote] my bad
×
×
  • Create New...