Jump to content

sethb

Members
  • Posts

    859
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by sethb

  1. [quote name='Kryievla' date='16 February 2010 - 07:39 AM' timestamp='1266305964' post='2185211'] Nothing to do with C&G, Jesper just has some complaints. And some grievances [/quote] Ahh my mistake. It being 3 am and all that didn't even cross my mind.
  2. CnG isn't even at war with Valhalla.
  3. [quote name='Oktavia' date='16 February 2010 - 04:57 AM' timestamp='1266296277' post='2184572'] Yet their signatures are still on the documents? [/quote] Are you referring to the Instrument of Surrender document?
  4. Damn man, whoever did that is a piece of !@#$. I hope you get everything sorted out.
  5. WOW, This changed my life forever. In all seriousness, Was this really needed? This could have been handled privately.
  6. [quote name='memoryproblems' date='15 February 2010 - 08:44 AM' timestamp='1266223451' post='2182626'] its always easier to come to an allies defense when they are on the side with statistical advantages. With that said, your DoW makes no sense. Its funny that you consider TFD attacking back against RoK to be "hurting" them. Its laughable really, to consider the exercise of their right to defend themselves from attacks as an attack against RoK. And your nuclear policy, stupid, one nuke means you can nuke all of your opponents? So if your at war against multiple alliances, you get one rogue nuke and hit them all? I lol'd. Impressive all around, you certainly are. [/quote] So you would have them not assist their ally just because they happen to be on the winning side of the war? I find it quite hilarious that a member of Echelon is insinuating that an alliance is being oppourtunistic. Also, Vespassianus do you even know the definition of a bandwagon? I'll help you out: Bandwagoning is jumping on an alliance with no legitimate entry into war. This is obviously not the case here so please don't spew forth idiotic !@#$%^&*.
  7. [quote name='Smooth Pancakes' date='15 February 2010 - 07:34 AM' timestamp='1266219297' post='2182567'] Apparently. We hadn't even planned on joining this war. We were under the assumption that we would spend this war watching and enjoying the rising GRL and dying environment. We went from having nearly all members completely inactive on the forums due to real life, to being officially in this war in less than 12 hours, all at the simple request of Ragnarok. A request that took me less than 1/2 a second to say yes to seeing as they are our longest and closest allies and have had our backs and us theirs since Day 1. The day I decline to come to RoK's aid when they ask us to, is the day that I leave CN forever, which isn't happening anytime soon. [/quote] Good luck to you guys, I know what it's like to be in that situation as I led an alliance with the same problem.
  8. [quote name='BloodFury' date='15 February 2010 - 07:08 AM' timestamp='1266217681' post='2182535'] The Bandwagon grows bigger. [/quote] Honoring treaties is bandwagoning?
  9. [quote name='Mathias' date='15 February 2010 - 01:59 AM' timestamp='1266199179' post='2181832'] I think Grub is busy at the moment. And as much as I didn't like you while you existed, you made JWConnor pout and cry in your disbandment thread; and for that you've earned my respect. Best of luck to all of you in your travels. [/quote] This good man summed up my thoughts perfectly.
  10. I thank you for all the hard work you put in, Admin.
  11. [quote name='NemaK' date='12 February 2010 - 03:36 AM' timestamp='1265945794' post='2176304'] Legion is not, and will not surrender. Fake !@#$ is fake. [/quote] Good, I look forward to seeing you get destroyed even more.
  12. I know VE averages anywhere from 25-40 people on irc at any given time, forums are a lot higher. I'd say MK is the most active alliance though.
  13. Why does side of the treaty web matter?
  14. Hmmm, I'd say my worst move was that whole coup drama that went on right before my rehab stint. Best would have to be not accepting that ZI and expulsion demanded by NPO.
  15. So you resigned an ODP just so you could retroactively declare war?
  16. [quote name='supercoolyellow' date='08 February 2010 - 09:52 PM' timestamp='1265665978' post='2169122'] I hope some of NATO's allies are realizing that they will need to counter. [/quote] I feel sorry for whoever does.
  17. [quote name='John Diesel' date='07 February 2010 - 06:26 PM' timestamp='1265567162' post='2167049'] 1. Why are your Ministers of Awesome, a completely powerless office, signing war dec's? You might as well include all deputy ministers and department chairs, seeing as they actually have some semblance of power. 2. Give me one good reason why Solaris, Lord of the Entente, did not post this thread. [/quote] I respect you, John. Although with the amount of reaching you've been doing lately I'm surprised you haven't injured your arm.
×
×
  • Create New...