Jump to content

Monty of the Herm

Members
  • Posts

    154
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Monty of the Herm

  1. My point is we were already in the position your coalition wants us to end up in this war in the DH/NPO War where we had to fight against a much superior coalition with no support from allies. Since then we have developed relationships in FA that actually matter and have formed alliances based on those relationships of trust which have been solidified on the battlefield in past wars. That being the case our friends and allies are not willing to allow what happened to us in DH/NPO happen again, because we are allies and we support each other. So your side insisting we're playing puppetmaster and holding our allies "hostage" in this war just isn't the case and has been proven by TPF's actions and the rest of our allies' actions. At least in DH/NPO they were honest and simply said "We Hate You" for their CB it's at least honest. And again I ask... Where did the "This war is about NSO not NPO" rhetoric go?
  2. Also where did the, "This war is about NSO not NPO" rhetoric go?
  3. "1. Allow their allies to surrender, and submit to terms when the time is appropriate." You just made my point for me we've already told our allies if it's in their best interests to bow out to do so, TPF did, the absolute bumbling your coalition has done to engage our coalition, and really pressure us and our allies to even consider any terms at all has strengthened the resolve of the coalition and pulled in more periphery alliances like R&R
  4. My whole response to you was simply to show that we never took any action against CIN they took offense to us protecting our members from rogues they harbored and aided against us, and so for no reason band wagonned into the larger conflict. So from this DoW I see that AE is showing that they do not tolerate that sort of behavior and they're willing to shed pixels to teach that lesson.
  5. Just to clarify this. We were attacked by rogues who we then targeted. Subsequently they were harbored by CIN, and sent aid while we were fighting the rogues. We never "attacked" or DoWed CIN as an alliance. We were taking action in dealing with rogues who CIN members were harboring and giving aid to against our members. They then bandwagoned into the greater conflict because they couldn't accept that fact and saw they might get a cheapshot in while we're getting dogpiled for a completely unrelated reason. So AE has subsequently decided by this action to show that they won't tolerate such behavior. This is completely unrelated to the other global war.
  6. Just to be clear we were attacked because we defended an ally in a completely separate conflict and to be clear in that conflict the other side is fighting for reasons which have nothing to do with you they are not crusading for you.
  7. [quote]People, I just want to say, can we all get along? Can we get along? [left]Rodney King[/quote][/left] [left][color=#000000]All I've gotten out of this thread is the fact that RV is even more irrelevant and antiquated then he's ever been; and that our coalitions really don't get along and we have all been waiting for this conflict to happen. And yet the side who doesn't give a rip about CBs is whining the loudest about the fact that this isn't on their terms which makes them look even worse than they already do. SO let's get to it and accumulate the only real statistic that matters in this game CASUALTIES![/color][/left] [left][color=#000000][OOC]Happy Martin Luther King Jr. Day to everybody![/OOC][/color][/left]
  8. [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1358114316' post='3075913'] So now you're not only preventing the conflict to escalate by escalating it, you are even deescalating it by escalating the conflict. Good to know, congratulations. [/quote] No... I was showing you that you are beating a dead horse by continuing this line of rhetoric since all parties involved in this see it for what it is and yet you insist it's something that it is not. In the end you seem intent on providing irrelevant commentary as a third party to this situation. Why continue this rhetoric unless you have a stake to claim.
  9. One of Pacifica's primary purposes is to "Bring Order to Chaos". In this situation we do so by not allowing this conflict to escalate or be lengthened by outside influences. Pacifica has even gone to the point of engaging in warfare to deescalate this conflict. [quote name='Hiro Nakara' timestamp='1357900254' post='3074706'] I'm disappointed, I'm not going to lie. I am happy I'm getting to fight my 2 favorite NPO guys before I go Shame It wont escalate so I can watch the rest of this realm burn on my way out [/quote] [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1357906309' post='3074725'] *snip* No, you aren't, in fact what you have done was exactly the opposite, you're escalating the conflict and yet this move doesn't impede that today or in the next 6 days NEW escalate it further. *snip* [/quote] So to continue with the line of rhetoric that we are escalating this conflict when even Kaskus admits openly that the conflict is being deescalated by our involvement is just ludicrous at this point. Pacifica Prevails! Ever Forward! o/
  10. ebil has returned to Bob... not that we ever left. This is truly a testament to our determination and resolve. o/
×
×
  • Create New...