youwish959

Good luck TORN.

Must be the failed tech deals.

It's your appearance in that thread, and your bullheadedness that ruined your old character, so why bring it up again?

I was reading a topic, and suddenly, when I clicked "next page", it said this:

You should see us as an ice breaker. We can break the ice, if you guys so wish, but we cannot do it, without being properly used.

Your a traitor.

We are not attacking you. We simply told you how you were wrong. Your the one who turned it into attacks with your insinuation that we are all sycophants. I would love for this topic to get back on the right track, as it had potential, but we cannot do so obviously until you leave.

The great one, seriously why are you still offering your opinions? They are obviously not needed, not appreciated, not listened to, not valued, and only shared among cowards.

Didn't you sign that treaty on a whim?

I was speaking of your dodging.

So you get the point?

We have renewed the pact into a Temporary Defense Agreement.

We don't care what you did with yellow sphereority, because that obviously did not work. There were how many grabs for power on yellow? We do not wish to grab the power on brown. We only wish to offer a third option. We are not competing, and in any logical theory, cannot be competing, as long as the only other signatory(ies) are members of Amber Accords, and have reaffirmed their commitment to the Accords, as Carpe Dieme has. Is there such a thing as trying to hard? I do not see why it is so suspicious. I fail how to see we cannot come off as genuine, when once again the only other signatory is a member of the Accords.

I don't understand how people can consider this bloc competing with the Amber Accords when Carpe Diem, the only other signatory, is a member. Not only that, but most, if not all signatories of the Amber Accords were invited to this. (I'm not exactly sure on the exact details, not my department) How can this bloc be anti Amber Accords, if the only other signatory, besides NSO is a member of the Amber Accords, and has reaffirmed their commitment to it, then how is Terra Cotta even a competitor.

Probably not the most influential, but influential nonetheless, is the removal of the underdog advantage, and placement of the new soldier efficiency system.

Depends upon the perception.

Why would someone ever buy nukes then?

What kind of change do you want?

Sup brah?

Obviously, something causes all these leaders to leave.

Had this been a continuum alliance, people would be screaming bloody overkill.

Another one bites the dust.

My only advice to you AUT, quit thinking you have to disband the alliance.

One more question directed at Franz Ferdinand. May I call you Archduke?

He does his share of both. I intend on joining his great crusade at one point in time.