Jump to content

Venizelos

Members
  • Posts

    860
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Venizelos

  1. KM is certainly controvertial, and our side is certainly not at all friendly; however ZIing people for old mistakes is not that popular in our side either. have fun with peace, at least for some time or till you mess up, martens. as for TPF, i'd say that i hadn't realized how insensitive they have grown of former friends' interests. too bad
  2. the president is gone... hail the President! o/ Finster, you were always a person i admired in IRON, one of my favourite councilors, and i'm really happy to see you become the new president! Peron is getting over your branch now? Lord Hippo, good luck in your endeavors! i hope that you will stay in IRON where mud is always abundant edit: phail spelling AGAIN >_>
  3. NO. NO NO NO NO NO. don't even think about it. also bump. also
  4. lol, he probably got confused with GTA
  5. i remember crushtania back from when he was TAB gov and we'd be talkin about Lucky Strikes is mad dog a drink or something? /me blames crazy long-haired guitar-carrying australians edit: phail spelling
  6. you guise left IRON and went and became all active in TORN and stuff.
  7. this is just a fancy way of saying, we're bored and want to fight against something.
  8. not even sure if i got this right here... what sizes are you looking for?
  9. while i'm not in IRON anymore i'd say that UME members going on #IRON and doing all sorts of trolling and flooding isn't helping your chances for peacing out
  10. so will WANG now get a protectorate from NPO? and will the character of the new alliance be leftist? :3
  11. i am pretty sure that just broke at least a dozen forum rules >_> and yeah if you can get 500 people to join CN it would be great. IRON did not declare on UME; they thought that they could get in a game and declare on another alliance. moreover, for the first few days there were absolutely no offensive wars on them; they were treated as rogues and only the nations that attacked IRONers were declared upon, but they kept declaring offensive wars. so a new alliance that is relatively active organized and logical is welcome, and most soon gain protectorates with bigger alliances and work with them, but these guys are just asshats.
  12. what is this god you are speaking of? i have never seen such a thing. also since all of you guys had tiny nations you didn't lose much anyways.
  13. hehe, about time! GPA have fun with the big sticks! as for aldern peterson's Qs earlier, nations need nukes as a detterence agaisnt raiding and roguing against them. if a nuclear rogue attacks you you should have nukes to retaliate promptly. also, nukes bump up your NS and make the alliance more secure in general, since they become a strong defensive (if not offensive) force that others don't tamper with.
  14. perhaps my critisism was uncalled for, but the last time i remember hearing your name before this thread was when i was reading the wiki on the GPA-Q war...
  15. actually, internets, what the hell? i don't know how your people have survived without pr0n and government propaganda all this time.
  16. interesting read, i've always felt that the wikis lack perspective. it also shows the need for organization especially when in a joint effort with other alliances, something that our side seems to have and the other side seems to almost avoid. i wasn't around when these old wars took place, but from what i've understood is that IRON never felt close to GATO or had any good reasons to. history, both in CN and in RL, shows that one tends to stress hints that support the most prefferable case and override and ignore those that point to a direction against his interests. despite the fact that you have taken part in such events and should have learned from them, it seems that you unfortunately haven't, given that, from what i undestand, your affiliation with GPA contributed significantly to their downfall. anyways, good luck and keep them coming
×
×
  • Create New...