Krunk the Great

Looks like a treaty got hit with an Avada Kedavra Congratulations Legacy.

Congratulations IAA on an intelligent FA decision.

[quote name='D34th' timestamp='1311017882' post='2758593'] I'm saddened and disappointed in see IAA go but I honestly wish the best for them. When you upgrade a treaty you just consider the previous one canceled and sign a new one, I though that was common knowledge. [/quote] When you downgrade a treaty you just consider the previous one canceled and sign a new one, I thought that was common knowledge. Downgrade, Upgrade, either way you are changing the terms of the treaty.

[quote name='RandomInterrupt' timestamp='1311017518' post='2758588'] It is a minor note and changes nothing, but for the record Polar did the canceling here. The IAA came to Polaris and advised us that they had decided to "downgrade" our treaty to an ODP. Our now former treaty held no such facility. I consider unilaterally deciding to change the terms of a treaty to be a violation of it, and therefore advised the IAA that they could consider it cancelled. This is unfortunate as I always held that the IAA to their word and believed we had a good past (and future) of cooperation. Despite that, Polaris sticks to their word, upholds their treaties, and expects the same from their allies. I don't know why the sudden change, but it does disappoint me greatly. [/quote] With that logic, upgrading a treaty is a violation too as you are unilaterally changing the terms (Just in the opposite direction).

[quote name='Lord Boris' timestamp='1310225999' post='2753301'] Wait, what? Legion undergoes a major PR and FA crisis, so their first order of business is appointing a rookie MoFA? [/quote] Instead of a new MoD, I know. Shocking.

[quote name='Jake Liebenow' timestamp='1310221179' post='2753275'] I'm going to continue the trend. I sure am golly gee whiz glad to know you are proud to be tied to legion. [/quote] Golly gee whiz, I sure am glad to know you are proud to be tied to Legion.

[quote name='Huang Ti' timestamp='1310161432' post='2752845'] So who gets NATO and Invicta in the break up? [/quote] [s]Legion[/s] The woman, obviously.

[quote name='Moose Hole' timestamp='1310158276' post='2752809'] How does this benefit NPO? [/quote] How did the treaty benefit NPO? *Looks at past war*

o/ NPO Excellent development.

Good luck to CCC.

[quote name='Hiro Nakara' timestamp='1309974977' post='2750497'] Sorry who are you? [/quote] Just some guy who's probably gonna get shot in the head in a few years and cause 50 years of debate over what happened.

[quote name='Jaiar' timestamp='1309925908' post='2750024'] Please clarify. It seems you are saying that VE was wrong to attack Polar for supposedly receiving information. I recall there was outrage over Dajobo merely listening to Lennox. Polar was accused of accepting information that contained war chest information. People are accepting spy reports which also contain war chest information. What is the difference? [/quote] You know as well as I, every alliance accepts information.

brb, off to the grassy knoll.

EDIT: I think my sig sums up something but Im not sure what.

[quote name='Letum' timestamp='1309884826' post='2749448'] NSO wants an apology for hurt feelings? Now I've seen everything. [/quote] NSO -- providing quality entertainment without the threat of war since 2009.

[quote name='Rush Sykes' timestamp='1309816566' post='2748715'] We take our lead from Legion. We will not act until they do. [/quote] So...you won't act.

[quote name='Sabcat' timestamp='1309813589' post='2748638'] And around we go again....... [/quote] Go play in traffic.

So...pretty much no protector? Gotcha.

[quote name='Sabcat' timestamp='1309811180' post='2748563'] Really, editing quotes is the best you can do? Silly child. [/quote] I edited it to reflect the truth my good man EDIT: simply saying fixed is considered bad by the gods of this world.

[quote name='Sabcat' timestamp='1309810985' post='2748556'] Yes, it's true that [b]most of our alliance[/b] was in pm ([b]unlike[/b] every other coalition alliance.[/quote] The truest statement made by a legion member in this thread.

[quote name='Varianz' timestamp='1309810256' post='2748537'] Ok now [i]that's[/i] an exaggeration. [/quote] More damage than Legion at least.

Never mind the fact that we did more damage to GOONS than all our allies combined. Never mind the fact that Legion offered token resistance (Sure all tiers fought. but did all NATIONS in those tiers fight? Nope.) Never mind the fact that we put our smaller, less resilient allies before ourselves. Allies who had no real reason to fight for us aside from being allies. Never mind the fact that thanks to the war, you now see 10k NS nations on the front page of our roster. Never mind the fact that thanks to the same war, you see 5 nations above 60k NS (From 12 at MOST) and only 20/100 above 30k Never mind the fact that PM is a viable strategy to avoid swarming Never mind the fact that Legion has the numbers and spread to make swarming a nonissue for the most part. Never mind the fact that Legion hit mass PM anyway. Never mind the fact that we have always burnt for our allies for [b]little reward[/b]. Never mind the fact that we fought harder against GOONS than nearly every alliance in the coalition Never mind the fact that we would do it over again were our allies in the same situation. Never mind the fact that we have historically gone to great lengths to ensure our allies security. Never mind the fact that some in GOONS and MK have even commented on the OWF in agreement with your token resistance

[quote name='Sabcat' timestamp='1309808435' post='2748485'] Brilliant! The surrender monkey's now think that the war would have been won if Legion hadn't been in the coalition. Keep it coming you deluded loons, this is is top draw stuff. [/quote] I love how you aren't even denying the fact that Legion's effort was minimal at best.

[quote name='Sabcat' timestamp='1309807926' post='2748467'] More incoherent drivel. In the last post you claim the coalition would have been better off with Legion out of the picture all together and now less than an hour later you claim the entire coalition campaign hinged on us. You're all over the place. Have a sit down and think about what you're trying to say. [/quote] So you're saying NSO should have let all..what...12? of our top tier get swarmed by alliances who could cycle nations in and out for [b]weeks[/b] and still have fresh nations? Yeah. real smart. Without you, we would have had a different strategy rather than having you and the strategy we did fail.

[quote name='Sniper Joe' timestamp='1309706863' post='2747644'] The Legion + NSO. [/quote] We'd kick them out for refusing to keep proper warchests despite my insistence