Jump to content

Krunk the Great

Members
  • Posts

    1,473
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Krunk the Great

  1. [quote name='Unknown Smurf' timestamp='1320084303' post='2835824'] especially when you have so few nations to work with (less than the enemies total). [/quote] Don't tell me you buy this crap you're selling about your side being smaller. Stop playing the victim. Also you really need to work on your statistical skills--percentages higher than 100 are absurd and you aren't taking multiple war slots into account (Each nation has 6 war slots available.) -- You divided by the wrong base. (NSO has 110 members but would have 660 war slots, for example) The correct base would be the total number of war slots for our side (For a percentage involving us).
  2. [quote name='Lusitan' timestamp='1320082027' post='2835803'] you put yourself in the dumbest situations[/quote] I wasn't aware honoring a MDP was a dumb situation. Is that an official Umbrella Government Position?
  3. [quote name='Silent Spectre' timestamp='1320080201' post='2835785'] NsO = too small for me to give a crap tbh. [/quote] MHA = too small for me to give a crap.
  4. [quote name='Silent Spectre' timestamp='1320080031' post='2835781'] Did I miss the memo where NSO now stands for New Samuri Order? I thought it was the Sith fighting Legion. [/quote] Honey, you missed several memos. NsO stands for New Samurai Order. New Sakura Order stole the acronym of my alliance and thus we have the same acronym. Or you could, you know, look at my nation's Alliance Affiliation.
  5. [quote name='IYIyTh' timestamp='1320079944' post='2835778'] I'm failing to see how this relates to your aggressive actions against the Legion and why the world should feel sorry for your ineptitude in affording a military and PR victory for the alliance you claim is "incompetent." [/quote] Legion would only be incompetent if they were, in fact, decisively losing to a coalition half their size. They have proven their point--they can give as good as they get from coalitions half their size. They're not doing much better than that though, tbh.
  6. [quote name='IYIyTh' timestamp='1320079679' post='2835774'] It is when you claim you can defeat a foe on your own. That's for sure. [/quote] Of course, how silly could some of our members be to bait an alliance with ridiculous notions that ignore numbers. You might actually TAKE THE BAIT like a....wait.....you did what? EDIT: Silly Krunk, make a complete thought will you?
  7. [quote name='Sabcat' timestamp='1320078693' post='2835755'] I suggested earlier that you could just get your allies to post an announcement that if white peace is not declared they will enter. Then everyone can walk away with their version of events intact. The world reaches their own conclusions. [/quote] I personally can't do much of anything.... Apparently according to Spectre Im not even a member of NSO
  8. [quote name='Sabcat' timestamp='1320078329' post='2835746'] They already have admitted defeat. [/quote] If you say we have already done that, then what is holding up a simple peace if that was the stipulation?
  9. [quote name='Lincongrad' timestamp='1320077873' post='2835737'] NSO has, frankly, treated us extremely poorly [/quote] Please keep in mind we do have several Ex-Pacificans (RV comes to mind immediately) in the alliance who may harbor ill will towards The Legion. Asking some of these members to make nice-nice with you is like asking NPO to make nice-nice with Dopp and Anthony XD EDIT: Shoot, its like asking Dopp and Anthony to make nice-nice with me.
  10. [quote name='Silent Spectre' timestamp='1320077864' post='2835735'] Dude "the first option would be a deception as we have not been defeated by Legion" your profile says you are in NsO... YOU DID LOSE TO LEGION. And NSO is losing at the moment to legion, so shut up and get your facts straight before coming to the table. I have no problems with NSO defending their ally. To me the reason they are being "picked on" for lack of better words is that it came out that THEY leaked the ss to Tetris, which means they are just as guilty. [/quote] [list=1][*][color="#008000"]The New Samurai Order has always supported her brothers in the New Sith Order and found a rather large distaste for the New Sakura Order's girly men. (Translation: ...Idiot...) [/color][*][color="#008000"]NSO is at the moment slightly statistically disadvantaged. NSO is not at this time defeated. If NSO was at this time defeated, the war would be over.[/color][*][color="#008000"]So NSO leaked something that was readily available in private channels?[/color][/list]
  11. [color="#008000"]On a separate note, I guess this war has proven my signature false....Too bad....or good for Legion....whichever one works.[/color]
  12. [quote name='IYIyTh' timestamp='1320077017' post='2835716'] You have been defeated by Legion. It's something even those people whom would love to see this war escelate will admit to, and have admitted to in previous posts. Just because you are delusional and don't want to accept reasonable surrender terms, (Hello, reverse Ramirus Maximus,) doesn't mean the Legion should be disadvantaged or attacked for continuing to fight when it was aggresively attacked by your alliance because you AND your ally who started this conflict refuse to admit defeat when you clearly are. [/quote] [color="#008000"]If NSO aggressively attacked Legion, where are Legions allies pouncing on their mutual defense clauses? What? You mean Legion's war was a war of aggression (Warranted or not, they are the aggressors)? Well shoot, that throws your theory of Legion being aggressively attacked by our alliance out the window. NSO attacked Legion because Legion attacked Tetris. That's what a MDP is. "If you attack this alliance, then we will attack you in defense."[/color] [color="#008000"]NSO knows when she has been defeated, and it is surely not now. She has faced much greater odds than this and lost NS at the same rate plenty of times.[/color]
  13. [quote name='WarriorConcept' timestamp='1320076379' post='2835706'] Then why is NSO threatening to call in its allies? [/quote] [color="#008000"]There are three possibilities [/color][list=1][*][color="#008000"]NSO Lies and says they were defeated by Legion[/color][*][color="#008000"]Legion, Tetris, and NSO simply shoulder their guns and go home[/color][*][color="#008000"]The war escalates[/color][/list][color="#008000"]Naturally the second option is preferable as it ends a war (The purpose of which was for Legion to show the world that they won't jump into peace mode at the drop of a hat, like the entire world and their mother expected them to, which is admirable I'll give them that) whose purpose has expired. The first option would be a deception as we have not been defeated by Legion, why would we tell the world we are except to stroke Legion's tiny nether regions even more. The third option is the least desirable, but still a possibility. It would end the war, yes. It would be much more decisive, yes. Personally? I don't have the time to invest into a much longer war. [/color]
  14. [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1320076162' post='2835700'] So what you guys are saying is that Legion does't have the right to ask for a simple surrender, when they clearly are winning, just because they are in the weaker side of the web? [img]http://eternosdiasfelizes.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/and-i-think-to-myself-what-a-wonderful-world.jpg?w=500&h=351[/img] [/quote] Except Legion is not "clearly winning"
  15. [quote name='bcortell' timestamp='1320032262' post='2835489'] So when are Tetris and NsO going to surrender? If you could last, say 16 more days exactly, I'd really appreciate it. [/quote] Well, NsO already surrendered : Also, we will last longer than that unless Legion decides to accept the best solution--white peace for all. Legion, we get it. You're not a paper tiger, more like a clay tiger. Your point is proven. Now buzz off.
  16. [quote name='BloodFury' timestamp='1320003225' post='2835159'] You honestly think MK would waste their time on Legion? [/quote] On Legion? Probably. They're fun to poke. Even lazy dogs snap once in a while.
  17. [quote name='BloodFury' timestamp='1320000467' post='2835143'] Would you see MK or IRON taking time to do this to Legion? [/quote] Honestly, I [i]could[/i] see MK doing this for kicks and giggles.
  18. [quote name='Dochartaigh' timestamp='1319983247' post='2835004'] MOMMY NSO AND TETRIS SAID MEAN THINGS [/quote] We're proud of Legion for dealing with it like a child a few years older, now we're asking them to grow up a bit more.
  19. [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1319945687' post='2834863'] I can almost see countless NSO members calling Legion WAE and more two or three threads mocking them. [/quote] Just sayin, that makes no sense compared to your quoted text. You seem to be answering someone elses comment there.
  20. [quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1319930994' post='2834750'] So you suck, why's that Legion's problem or how doe sit factor into the actual numbers? Your side's civil wars aren't part of the equation. [/quote] When calculating statistics, you must eliminate the useless element - IAA. Otherwise you reach this delusion that the sides were somehow less even than they are. No one disputes the lack of IAA involvement in this war and yet they still include IAA in all calculations because it makes Legion look better.
  21. [quote name='Banedon' timestamp='1319929363' post='2834738'] If RV or Krunk spin any harder or faster, they're going to start generating electric current. [/quote] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmMQfTJ3gYk&feature=player_detailpage [quote name='Lord Levistus' timestamp='1319929608' post='2834742'] ok, then spin the Bipolar fiasco war into a NSO Victory for me please. I want to see how this is done. [/quote] Our strategic goals have always been met or exceeded. We have never once been disappointed.
  22. [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1319929208' post='2834734'] Nice back pedaling, NSO. [/quote] I would like to know how my post is related to one made several months ago about an entirely different topic about which we were in fact proven correct at the time.
  23. [quote name='Lord Levistus' timestamp='1319928935' post='2834731'] You've done it before you can do it again. Even if these are all "Statistical Defeats" or a "Coalition Defeat, Front Strategic Victory. Statistical Draw" in NSO vocabulary. [/quote] We have never once been in a war that has been a strategic defeat.
  24. [quote name='Delta1212' timestamp='1319922311' post='2834669'] So your coalition was just a Paper Tiger. [/quote] Could have used a picture of the Doppelganger Trinity.
  25. [quote name='WarriorConcept' timestamp='1319921807' post='2834659'] Actually it was[url="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvhBDJVbPEMSdDJIY1E0U1lwZ2s5NVlXU1pjQ0JBc0E&hl=en_US#gid=0"] 236 against 224, with the coalition outnumbering Legion.[/url] Keep on spinning, it amuses the rest of us a lot. [/quote] Its ok *Pats WC on the head* you're "right".
×
×
  • Create New...