Jump to content

i surge i

Members
  • Posts

    259
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by i surge i

  1. Of course you can say what you want, but you can not just blatantly disregard the fact that neither of us was involved in the original conflict to begin with.
  2. I love yuengling so much, kudos to you good sir.
  3. There are other citadel alliances too :v The main point i'm driving at is that you can't call this the same conflict, this is an entirely new war between us which is completely fine with me. [ooc] Good analogy by the way, i laughed[ooc]
  4. When i say uninvolved i mean it in the sense that we were not in that conflict but were prepped to defend our allies if they needed it. You guys decided to be forthright and declare on us preemptively creating a whole new conflict due to the fact that that none of our alliances were fighting in the war that was happening at the time. [ooc] I would have a beer with you too tbh [ooc] Edit: sorry for the double post
  5. It becomes a separate war when you attack a uninvolved party, which you did, since we were uninvolved at the time.
  6. No because at the time we were an uninvolved party, you chose to ignore your allies and instead came for us.
  7. Well they did attack an uninvolved party with no CB whatsoever, when they could have entered via treaty in the same way.
  8. They had reason to attack, due to treaty obligations, while you and TOP did not.
  9. Yes im towing the party line, it's not like i was there for it or anything. Statements like this further reinforce my previous comment.
  10. None of you are really getting the whole non-paper treaty idea, are you.
  11. So are you truly ignorant or is this all forced?
  12. Hey do you remember that time you declared war on GLoF for declaring on another orange alliance, yeah good times man.
  13. Am i the only one who finds this mercilessly ironic?
×
×
  • Create New...