Timtacious Posted September 25, 2009 Report Share Posted September 25, 2009 He was the last time I checked. If he isn't, well. He's still alright in my book. Voodoo is in the IAA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Panda Posted September 25, 2009 Report Share Posted September 25, 2009 Voodoo is in the IAA. Thanks Tim, I'll make a note of that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidMercury Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 This thread is truly pointless. Settle it the good ole fashion way and sling some nooks around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merrie Melodies Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 We don't owe you or your damned alliance a thing. Now I remember why I am so fond of you! |-O-| Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriekfreak Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Classy as always Sith. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Venizelos Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 it seems TRE is unable to use IRC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Classy as always Sith. Read the discussion. I am constantly amazed at the blatant disregard some nations have towards actually attempting to inform themselves of a situation before commenting. Also, http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...t&p=1859935 Those that find themselves so concerned with the manner in which we handle our affairs are welcome to attempt enforcement of their own method upon us. We stand ready. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriekfreak Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 (edited) Read the discussion.I am constantly amazed at the blatant disregard some nations have towards actually attempting to inform themselves of a situation before commenting. Also, http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...t&p=1859935 Those that find themselves so concerned with the manner in which we handle our affairs are welcome to attempt enforcement of their own method upon us. We stand ready. Oh kind Sir, I did read the discussion. I'm not appalled at the rogue thing but more appalled at the way you guys jump on a single individual (I've seen this before, more specifically against one of your allies), you are like vultures that haven't eaten in months. The manner in which you handle your affairs is up to yourself, as it is up to me to comment on that handling. Now I can mimic your last sentence and try to be all though and say "If you don't like it, do something about it". But I won't, because frankly, you are not worth it. Edited October 2, 2009 by kriekfreak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wad of Lint Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Oh kind Sir, I did read the discussion. I'm not appalled at the rogue thing but more appalled at the way you guys jump on a single individual (I've seen this before, more specifically against one of your allies), you are like vultures that haven't eaten in months. The manner in which you handle your affairs is up to yourself, as it is up to me to comment on that handling. Now I can mimic your last sentence and try to be all though and say "If you don't like it, do something about it". But I won't, because frankly, you are not worth it. Do you support completely uninvolved parties demanding a response and/or proof? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriekfreak Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Do you support completely uninvolved parties demanding a response and/or proof? No I do not, not in this case. As said before, it is not about the rogue thing but entirely on the jumping on one person thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heft Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 No I do not, not in this case. As said before, it is not about the rogue thing but entirely on the jumping on one person thing. That's stupid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinan Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 (edited) That's stupid. Indeed. It is. He's likely a supporter of anything that stands in opposition to us. (OOC: This thread was begging for some Edited October 2, 2009 by Corinan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 That's stupid. Unfortunately that seems to be our lot in this life. Of course, having only stupid detractors means that those of reason and intelligence, while possibly not expressly supportive, at least are not in opposition to us. I guess I means we are doing it right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Nicholas II Posted October 3, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 (edited) How is it that this topic still is not locked , failure for people to read my requests to lock threads =/ what is everyone moaning about now? our rouge still doesn't leave our AA and lost a good 40 K NS for attacking a nation and then having this friends tag team the ghost/rogue/whateveridon'treallycarejustwanthimtosodoffforgoodok Edited October 3, 2009 by Emperor Nicholas II Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.