Sumeragi Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 (edited) We are closing our territorial and exclusive economic zone waters to all military ships unless they have prior permission. Civilian ships will be allowed to pass unhindered. Ishima Ryu, Prime Minister Various Waters of Yamato *Private* “This should block all naval forces from leaving or entering the West Sea. Activate the Yari anti-ship missiles especially in Okinawa and Miyako.” OOC: West Sea is the East China Sea, and Yari is the Harpoon missile. Edited May 28, 2009 by Sumeragi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Margrave Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 We are closing our territorial and exclusive economic zone waters to all military ships unless they have prior permission. Civilian ships will be allowed to pass unhindered.Ishima Ryu, Prime Minister *Private* “This should block all naval forces from leaving or entering the West Sea. Activate the Yari anti-ship missiles especially in Okinawa and Miyako.” OOC: West Sea is the East China Sea, and Yari is the Harpoon missile. The Hansa has expressed mailed several boxes of pamphlets to the government of Yamoto, titled "Why it is a bad idea to close your territorial waters", a story by witnesses to the destruction of the DKT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tahsir Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 (edited) So Yamato is is doing what everyone else is doing. Why is this news? We don't know why a nation would want to close all external economic shipping from their waters, but that is the current trend these days. OOC: srsly, anyone that is going to get up in arms because sumer made an EEZ really is a troll Edited May 28, 2009 by Tahsir Re Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sumeragi Posted May 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 The Hansa has expressed mailed several boxes of pamphlets to the government of Yamoto, titled "Why it is a bad idea to close your territorial waters", a story by witnesses to the destruction of the DKT. Obviously we have learned: We're restricting only naval ships, which all nations do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firestorm Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 Who owns the land opposite you in China? I hope it is you or they might have something to say about this regardless of it restricting Naval ships or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sumeragi Posted May 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 Who owns the land opposite you in China? I hope it is you or they might have something to say about this regardless of it restricting Naval ships or not. Palintine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of cochin Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 We hope this restriction does not apply to the Korea Strait between the island of Tsushima and Pusan of South Korea? A Royal Cochin Naval Task Force is scheduled to transit through the Korea Strait to the Yellow Sea region in the forthcoming days. We would like to have prior notification if this particular stretch of water is out of bounds to naval vessels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sumeragi Posted May 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 (edited) We hope this restriction does not apply to the Korea Strait between the island of Tsushima and Pusan of South Korea? A Royal Cochin Naval Task Force is scheduled to transit through the Korea Strait to the Yellow Sea region in the forthcoming days.We would like to have prior notification if this particular stretch of water is out of bounds to naval vessels. The Korean Strait is under the jurisdiction of Korea, which has a stricter policy than ours. Nevertheless, given how Cochin had been kind enough to send our exiled people back to us, we shall allow the fleet to pass through our side of the Tsushima strait, the area between Tsushima and Kyushu. Please send the list of ships and schedule for processing. OOC: Mercy has Tsushima, for your information. Edited May 28, 2009 by Sumeragi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MercyFallout Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 The Korean Strait is under the jurisdiction of Korea, which has a stricter policy than ours. Nevertheless, given how Cochin had been kind enough to send our exiled people back to us, we shall allow the fleet to pass through our side of the Tsushima strait, the area between Tsushima and Kyushu. Please send the list of ships and schedule for processing.OOC: Mercy has Tsushima, for your information. For clarification on Korean maritime policy, our waters are open at all times to any merchant or otherwise commercial vessel (privately or publicly owned) provided that they report their course, heading, and maintain that course (with a small corridor of freedom) during their voyage through Korean waters. Non-allied military vessels (with the strict exception of those of the Hanseatic Commonwealth as they, like their predecessors of Neo Japan they are able to transport small numbers of military naval vessels through the Strait on the Japanese side of Tsushima again in a very tight corridor) are prohibited from entering Korean waters and will be fired on after being hailed to turn around. Furthermore, roughly half of the Tsushima Strait is under the control of Korea and thus is subject to the same laws. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sumeragi Posted May 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 (with the strict exception of those of the Hanseatic Commonwealth as they, like their predecessors of Neo Japan they are able to transport small numbers of military naval vessels through the Strait on the Japanese side of Tsushima again in a very tight corridor)Furthermore, roughly half of the Tsushima Strait is under the control of Korea and thus is subject to the same laws. Are not the two saying the same thing? Please clarify the exception part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 (edited) Are unarmed troop-transports included in this closure to military ships? Edited May 28, 2009 by Lynneth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sumeragi Posted May 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 Are unarmed troop-transports included in this closure to military ships? If unarmed, they are not included in the closure. However, notification would be necessary to avoid possible complications. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk11 Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 (edited) The Elective Dictatorship of Palintine expresses concern over this policy, specifically how close your "exclusive economic zone" extends towards Taiwan and our own coastline. While we may not have the most prominent navy in the world, we still have one, and it maintains routine patrols. I trust you will allow an exception for us. Edited May 28, 2009 by hawk_11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 If unarmed, they are not included in the closure. However, notification would be necessary to avoid possible complications. Acknowledged. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sumeragi Posted May 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 The Elective Dictatorship of Palintine expresses concern over this policy, specifically how close your "exclusive economic zone" extends towards Taiwan and our own coastline. While we may not have the most prominent navy in the world, we still have one, and it maintains routine patrols. I trust you will allow an exception for us. We respect the territorial integrity of Palintine, and will make certain that there is no conflict between us. In fact, we offer to cooperate in cracking down on militarism. *Classified Message* Does Palintine have a similar policy? We notice that the Taiwan Strait seems to be opened to military ships. We worry of potential problems stemming from the area. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk11 Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 (edited) We respect the territorial integrity of Palintine, and will make certain that there is no conflict between us. In fact, we offer to cooperate in cracking down on militarism.*Classified Message* Does Palintine have a similar policy? We notice that the Taiwan Strait seems to be opened to military ships. We worry of potential problems stemming from the area. -classified- The Elective Dictatorship of Palintine has the same water policy as you and almost every other nation on earth: no military ships in our water. Between our nation and your nation, the Taiwain Strait has effectively been sealed off to foreign military vessels. Palintine has review its current "territorial waters" claims and noticed disputed territory. Black Line: Palintine's patrol border. We recommend the "disputed" waters be jointly patrolled. Edited May 28, 2009 by hawk_11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sumeragi Posted May 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 (edited) *Reply* Excellent! We thank Palintine for its wise decision, and agree on the joint patrol area. We shall discuss exact EEZ boundaries in the future. Edited May 28, 2009 by Sumeragi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk11 Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 OOC: I just threw down an edit as you posted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sumeragi Posted May 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 OOC: I just threw down an edit as you posted. OOC: And I edited the reply. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 (edited) These maritime borders will, of course, be respected. OOC EDIT: Accidentally posted OOC. Edited May 28, 2009 by Subtleknifewielder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markus Wilding Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 OOC: Was that post meant to be OOC, Subtle? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 OOC: Was that post meant to be OOC, Subtle? OOC No, actually... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lavo Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 ***Classified*** Half of the RN, including the RNS Seiwa, are being dispatched to Korea immediately. They will be accompanied by 500 000 soldiers, and thousands of armoured units. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 The Chairman smiled wrly, "We may not stay so neutral if this turns into a conflict. We approve of the presence of the RA in our proximity." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.