Qaianna Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 It should actually be exclusive to nuke targets. We shouldn't let just ANYONE fly the flag of honour.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
admin Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 It should actually be exclusive to nuke targets. We shouldn't let just ANYONE fly the flag of honour.. This is a pretty good idea. If your nation has been nuked then the flag becomes available to you to select. Hmmmm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Flinders Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 It should actually be exclusive to nuke targets. We shouldn't let just ANYONE fly the flag of honour.. I was coming here to suggest something like this. Stealing my thunder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master-Debater Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 Lets uncap GRL instead. Im MD and I support this idea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 Lets uncap GRL instead. I support both. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strelock Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 Lets uncap GRL instead. i also support that idea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qaianna Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 I was coming here to suggest something like this.Stealing my thunder Not stealing. Looting. Granted, I lost 420 priests and 230 popemobiles in the theological attack to get it.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naamah Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 This is a pretty good idea. If your nation has been nuked then the flag becomes available to you to select. Hmmmm. I love it! Make it happen captain B) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korlus Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 (edited) Lets uncap GRL instead. We should, and we should allow for it's affect on nations whose environment is already pretty bad. Allowing the environment to go into the negatives would be interesting when combined with an uncapped GRL. It would make the effect of nuclear weapons fairly large upon the rest of the world, which could lead to interesting consequences (although seeing CN as it is, it likely won't - the opportunity is there, and will be far greater than it currently is. It would also make Radiation Cleanup a little better, but still not great... If doing this, I would advocate a slightly slower increase of GRL, however - making it more devastating when it arrives at higher levels. While on the topic of GRL, I would probably also keep track of the nuclear weapons that actually hit, meaning that it would go up dramatically over the course of a war, as opposed to jumping once and it remaining almost constant. ... Which brings me nicely back to the topic at hand. Unlike before where being hit by a single nuke was rare, I would suggest implementing this flag for nations who have been hit by multiple nukes. This goes hand-in-hand with the idea I proposed, where more nukes mean more in general - so a nation who'd been nuked, say ten times could perhaps receive that flag, and a nation who's been nuked say twenty times could receive a slightly... Better version? Perhaps with a green radition symbol, slightly feathered to look like it's actually glowing? Edit: Perhaps something akin to this: (Did it quickly - just a quick edit based upon the original poster's flag to give an example. Could do with a quick clean up, but I'm heading off out soon.) Edited April 27, 2009 by Korlus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elderago Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 Once the nations of planet Bob have been made in to ruin then the hordes of the New Desolate Order can rampage once again. So unleash the nuclear destruction all those at war and turn Bob into a desolate wasteland.o/ St.Nuke o/ Sahara o/ NDO yey tyranny run by zombies and mutants instead of cows !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qaianna Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 yey tyranny run by zombies and mutants instead of cows !! Great War 7: The New Zombie Order and its allies against the Genetically Outrageous Order of Nucleus Splitting and its allies. NZO wins once it finds a new emperor.. OppenheimersRevenge, better known as Moo-Glows with Radiation! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vulkan Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 Lets uncap GRL instead. Nukes will be immoral. :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stylesjl Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 Yes uncap the radiation. Add a new flag. Buhahahaha!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roofus Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 Yes uncap the radiation. Add a new flag. Buhahahaha!!!!! Uncapping radiation is nothing short of suicide. This war alone would pretty much reduce the number of civilians by 90%, and I'm not talking about nations that have been nuked. Than again... Nuclear winter would be something nothing less than interesting because nations would have to sell of extra infra/tech to support their bills. It would be like a 30 day period where CN resets itself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kastro Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 Uncapped GRL would be awesome. Or at least a higher cap that makes it less minor nuisance and more major concern. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naamah Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 sounds like a great way to bill lock a ton of nations flag: *thumbs up* uncapped GRL: *thumbs down* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alicia Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 I would just like to point out that uncapping the GRL has a thread in the suggestion box, perhaps everyone here supporting this should head over there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xoindotnler Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 I like both idea's . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mordd Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 (edited) I request the GRL be permanently uncapped from the level of 5 as the maximum effect on the game and allow it to apply the effect no matter how high the GRL goes. Time to make nukes a valuable resource again. edit: lmao beaten to the punch, shoulda read more than the OP before posting, but great minds think alike and all that hehehe Edited April 27, 2009 by Mordd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earogema Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 I support both the flag idea, and the GRL one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philp110 Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 Yes to both ideas! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stylesjl Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 Uncapping radiation is nothing short of suicide. This war alone would pretty much reduce the number of civilians by 90%, and I'm not talking about nations that have been nuked. Than again... Nuclear winter would be something nothing less than interesting because nations would have to sell of extra infra/tech to support their bills. It would be like a 30 day period where CN resets itself. Not if you have a giant warchest to hold out the nuclear fallout for months. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Random Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 This is a pretty good idea. If your nation has been nuked then the flag becomes available to you to select. Hmmmm. You should make a topic in the suggestions forum and have everybody submit Nuclear flags and then have the admin team decide which one to add. That would be epic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doitzel Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 Not if you have a giant warchest to hold out the nuclear fallout for months. Oh, so in other words the change would benefit huge nations in long-established alliances and screw over the little guy? Well, par for the course I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hizzy Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 yes to both ideas. at the VERY least, make that flag a privilege for those who get nuked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.