Vasili Markov Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 Uncap GRL and make its effects worse. Lets have a couple of months of negative income for everyone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jens of the desert Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 This flag should be allowed for all those nuclear testing grounds out there Yes to the flag idea. No to GRL (It would only be aweseome at first....then you would realize your mistake) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobama Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 Uncapping GRL would bring the Cyberverse down, as a whole, several pegs. We're doing that anyways, and our way is more fun. Don't ruin it admin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finch Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 yea uncapping GRL is a terrible Idea. Like 3/4 of CN nations would be destroyed via billock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tulafaras Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 the nations who would be destroyed are the small guys who have little to do with this war (or nothing at all). my warchest can carry me through 3 months of nuclear anarchy if necessary, but why should those nations have similar warchests? they are not prepared for such a situation (and frankly they shouldn't need to be). So no i do not agree with insane ideas like uncapping GRL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobama Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 the nations who would be destroyed are the small guys who have little to do with this war (or nothing at all).my warchest can carry me through 3 months of nuclear anarchy if necessary, but why should those nations have similar warchests? they are not prepared for such a situation (and frankly they shouldn't need to be). So no i do not agree with insane ideas like uncapping GRL. But us little guys have heart! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heyman Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 While we're at it, let's make some events only available during high GR Levels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Emperor Brian Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 While we're at it, let's make some events only available during high GR Levels. "Your entire population has come down with severe radiation poisoning and have turned into ghoulish zombies! Option 1: Purge the zombies from your nation. -99% population. Option 2: Aid the zombies in taking over Tenpenny Tower. + 1 Tenpenny Tower Suite, Positive Karma No response: Population happiness -40" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade Tiki Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 Ok, so we can: - Uncap GRL, maybe with a square-root (not linear) affect on nations - Add this flag, and only allow nuclear victims to fly it And a new suggestion! - Include thwarted nukes in the Global Radiation count (since the weapons-grade uranium is still released into the atmosphere) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernardo Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 Maybe Admin should post "I will remove the cap on GRL if I do not receive 500 $20 donations within the next 72 hours." That help pay for a much better server. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord of the Port Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 Maybe Admin should post "I will remove the cap on GRL if I do not receive 500 $20 donations within the next 72 hours."That help pay for a much better server. I am not sure if throwing more money at it will yield a better server; there is just so much you can do with a single server for the game, and turning off non-essential options at peak times. At some point the basic architecture of CN would have to change, in order for multiple servers to facilitate everybody at peak times playing with full functionality. Also, I'll stick with my current flag, thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enterprize Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 (edited) Mayhaps we should let the current GRL go down before uncapping the GRL, if indeed we do uncap it. It would give larger/MPing nations a chance to rethink their mad liberal usage of the nuclear weapon, while not utterly destroying the environment to those who would certainly not have raised it so much knowing the consequences. Edited April 27, 2009 by Enterprize Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homura Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 Lets uncap GRL instead. Yes! I've been advocating this for months, because the people it screws over are the ones with big nations who have bills 60-70% of their collections who will have to sell off their infrastructure if they didn't save up enough money, while the little nations with bills around only 10-20% are allowed to thrive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sancus Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 Lets do this thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qaianna Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 Maybe Admin should post "I will remove the cap on GRL if I do not receive 500 $20 donations within the next 72 hours."That help pay for a much better server. Or, judging from some of the replies here, dry up the incoming donation stream. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cptblck Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 i demand this be the flag nice and simple Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 Admin, I request you spam filter my name, you already spamfiltered my meme. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korlus Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 i demand this be the flag nice and simple I'd prefer the slightly simpler ones - that doesn't look quite centred, and the feathering looks pixellated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KCToker Posted April 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 GRL is currently 29.93. This puts it above the 12th place sanctioned alliance (FOK) at 29.11. GRL is now sanctioned! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingly Posted May 1, 2009 Report Share Posted May 1, 2009 GRL is big enough to be sanctioned, this should be added Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lafiel Posted May 1, 2009 Report Share Posted May 1, 2009 Good suggestion ,specially the one that said it be accessible to the nations who get nuked ,i say it be accessible to the nation which get nuked for a period of time. by the way i still rather use the black rose flag i currently use Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lcdt94 Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 Admin, I request you spam filter my name, you already spamfiltered my meme. You really do like all the attention, don't you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 You really do like all the attention, don't you? You play this game for your reasons, I play it for mine, besides being popular has its benefits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stylesjl Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 Oh, so in other words the change would benefit huge nations in long-established alliances and screw over the little guy?Well, par for the course I guess. Come on, what could possibly go wrong? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lukapaka Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 Uncapping the GRL: The ultimate anti-inflation technique. I really like the idea of bigger nations getting hurt a little. For a while it seemed like CN achieved a nice equilibrium of peace, with big nations getting bigger, and little nations pretending they could catch up. However, I don't think the idea is too practical. Oh, and the flag... yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.