Sumeragi Posted March 28, 2009 Report Share Posted March 28, 2009 Post any stats that you might be sharing. Tech Nukes Kaiser Martens → Sumeragi : 1 Soldiers/Tanks Ships Planes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted March 28, 2009 Report Share Posted March 28, 2009 (edited) Or no sharing of any planes, troops, ships, weapons etc? Thats a much better solution! Edited March 28, 2009 by LeVentNoir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sumeragi Posted March 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 28, 2009 *Yawn* Mind if you stop your rants for once, LVN? This isn't science. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generalissimo Posted March 28, 2009 Report Share Posted March 28, 2009 Mind if you stop your rants for once, LVN? This isn't science. LeVentNoir actually has a point this time, CNRP transnational sharing has become ridiculous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerreyRough Posted March 28, 2009 Report Share Posted March 28, 2009 I agree. No sharing stats is a much better idea than sharing; too many complications can arise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justinian the Mighty Posted March 28, 2009 Report Share Posted March 28, 2009 Nuke sharing is a no. Nukes and navy = what you have ingame. There's no exception to that rule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted March 28, 2009 Report Share Posted March 28, 2009 Nuke sharing is a no. Nukes and navy = what you have ingame. There's no exception to that rule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted March 28, 2009 Report Share Posted March 28, 2009 However confusing tech sharing might be, however, it can and will continue to happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted March 28, 2009 Report Share Posted March 28, 2009 However confusing tech sharing might be, however, it can and will continue to happen. Tech sharing is easy, as the person providing a bonus does not have to suffer a penalty, and is always a constant bonus. You find the new level with only the knowledge of the tech share, and a quick look at both parties IG nations. Sharing anything else is A: difficult to keep track of, B: open to so much 'fuzziness' C: just plain not needed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted March 28, 2009 Report Share Posted March 28, 2009 Tech sharing is easy, as the person providing a bonus does not have to suffer a penalty, and is always a constant bonus. You find the new level with only the knowledge of the tech share, and a quick look at both parties IG nations.Sharing anything else is A: difficult to keep track of, B: open to so much 'fuzziness' C: just plain not needed. Then apparently, we have no disagreements on this issue... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justinian the Mighty Posted March 28, 2009 Report Share Posted March 28, 2009 Tech sharing is easy, as the person providing a bonus does not have to suffer a penalty, and is always a constant bonus. You find the new level with only the knowledge of the tech share, and a quick look at both parties IG nations.Sharing anything else is A: difficult to keep track of, B: open to so much 'fuzziness' C: just plain not needed. wait wha-? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerreyRough Posted March 29, 2009 Report Share Posted March 29, 2009 Yea, sharing other stuff shouldn't be done, as LVN said. Plus something could be given away (i.e. a bunch of airplanes), then later the seller RP's as if having them again (so then thus the other person has some free jets that they can link to, while the giver still has the same amount). Its (vaguely) like nation-merges; it could be good and useful thing to RP, but easily abused, difficult to keep track of exact stats, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadowsage Posted March 29, 2009 Report Share Posted March 29, 2009 Yea, sharing other stuff shouldn't be done, as LVN said. Plus something could be given away (i.e. a bunch of airplanes), then later the seller RP's as if having them again (so then thus the other person has some free jets that they can link to, while the giver still has the same amount).Its (vaguely) like nation-merges; it could be good and useful thing to RP, but easily abused, difficult to keep track of exact stats, etc. Quoted For Truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sumeragi Posted March 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 29, 2009 Nuke sharing is a no. Nukes and navy = what you have ingame. There's no exception to that rule. Neither is completely correct. The actual ruling stated that the total number of nukes/ships defined by total IG number. This means that if I give Sarah a carrier (when I currently have 6), I can only use 5 until either she gains a IG carrier or that carrier is sunk. Now, shall we get on with business? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted March 29, 2009 Report Share Posted March 29, 2009 (edited) Neither is completely correct. The actual ruling stated that the total number of nukes/ships defined by total IG number. This means that if I give Sarah a carrier (when I currently have 6), I can only use 5 until either she gains a IG carrier or that carrier is sunk.Now, shall we get on with business? Incorrect. You cannot share nukes or ships. I clarified that, if you wish to ignore it then I urge others to ignore your abuse of an old and already corrected statement. Edited March 29, 2009 by Sargun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justinian the Mighty Posted March 29, 2009 Report Share Posted March 29, 2009 I don't remember the rule being that way sumer. The way I recall it is, your ingame numbers, no multipliers or modifiers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted March 29, 2009 Report Share Posted March 29, 2009 I don't remember the rule being that way sumer. The way I recall it is, your ingame numbers, no multipliers or modifiers. Although there is a grey area...you are capable of having a certain ship or other piece of technology ingame...but you purchase a better form of it from another nation who is RP'ing. Then, technically, it's yours, and the other person is free to make more for themselves. This is not technically sharing anything, but purchasing--as you would ingame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V The King Posted March 29, 2009 Report Share Posted March 29, 2009 Although there is a grey area...you are capable of having a certain ship or other piece of technology ingame...but you purchase a better form of it from another nation who is RP'ing. Then, technically, it's yours, and the other person is free to make more for themselves.This is not technically sharing anything, but purchasing--as you would ingame. It is not applicable to ships or nuclear weapons - those are only able to be roleplayed if you own them in-game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted March 29, 2009 Report Share Posted March 29, 2009 It is not applicable to ships or nuclear weapons - those are only able to be roleplayed if you own them in-game. That's exactly what I said...you have them ingame. However, you purchase those things from someone who has a more modern tech year. For example...you can have battleships, but only just. You purchase them from a nation that is capable of having Aircraft Carriers, and can therefore build battleships that are better than the ones you could build on your own. THAT is what I'm talknig about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Frost Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 That's exactly what I said...you have them ingame. However, you purchase those things from someone who has a more modern tech year.For example...you can have battleships, but only just. You purchase them from a nation that is capable of having Aircraft Carriers, and can therefore build battleships that are better than the ones you could build on your own. THAT is what I'm talknig about. You can do whatever you feel you want. I will continue to RP and only recognize ships and weapons at your own tech level, and I will only continue to RP and recognize IG navy=What you have Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 That's exactly what I said...you have them ingame. However, you purchase those things from someone who has a more modern tech year.For example...you can have battleships, but only just. You purchase them from a nation that is capable of having Aircraft Carriers, and can therefore build battleships that are better than the ones you could build on your own. THAT is what I'm talknig about. I Don't care who you buy what from. You could have super morphing ships which shoot lasers out their ***, bought from nation xyz with 100000000 tech but I will consider them to function at your tech level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shahman Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 (edited) I think SKW is saying this: Nation A can build battleships, and is tech-sharing with nation B. Nation A is exactly at the IG level to build battleships. Nation B can build aircraft carriers. Nation A can build BATTLESHIPS equipped with tech of ACs. Edited March 30, 2009 by shahman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 I think SKW is saying this:Nation A can build battleships, and is tech-sharing with nation B. Nation A is exactly at the IG level to build battleships. Nation B can build aircraft carriers. Nation A can build BATTLESHIPS equipped with tech of ACs. No, he is saying that Nation A can build battleships, and is tech-sharing with nation B. Nation A is exactly at the IG level to build battleships. Nation B Has much higher tech Nation A can build BATTLESHIPS equipped at the tech level of nation B Which is wrong. It should be Nation A can build battleships, and is tech-sharing with nation B. Nation A is exactly at the IG level to build battleships. Nation B Has much higher tech Nation A can build BATTLESHIPS equipped at the tech level of 0.25 (B-A) +A Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 You can do whatever you feel you want. I will continue to RP and only recognize ships and weapons at your own tech level, and I will only continue to RP and recognize IG navy=What you have So that means you're going to take the railguns off your ships, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 (edited) I Don't care who you buy what from. You could have super morphing ships which shoot lasers out their ***, bought from nation xyz with 100000000 tech but I will consider them to function at your tech level. No need to be an @$$ about it. And you're taking it way to the extreme. Besides, are you denying that superior technology is NEVER purchased from a more advanced nation by a less advanced nation? I think SKW is saying this:Nation A can build battleships, and is tech-sharing with nation B. Nation A is exactly at the IG level to build battleships. Nation B can build aircraft carriers. Nation A can build BATTLESHIPS equipped with tech of ACs. No, he is saying thatNation A can build battleships, and is tech-sharing with nation B. Nation A is exactly at the IG level to build battleships. Nation B Has much higher tech Nation A can build BATTLESHIPS equipped at the tech level of nation B Which is wrong. It should be Nation A can build battleships, and is tech-sharing with nation B. Nation A is exactly at the IG level to build battleships. Nation B Has much higher tech Nation A can build BATTLESHIPS equipped at the tech level of 0.25 (B-A) +A No, you both completely missed what I'm saying. THIS is what I'm saying. Nation A can build battleships, and is tech-sharing with nation B. Nation A is exactly at the IG level to build battleships. Nation B Has much higher tech Nation B builds the BATTLESHIPS equipped at the tech level of nation B Nation A purchases the Battleships from Nation B. And of course, after a while, the ships that Nation A has deteriorate somewhat, because Nation A doesn't have the technology to completely maintain them. Edited March 30, 2009 by Subtleknifewielder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.