Strykewolf Posted March 28, 2009 Report Share Posted March 28, 2009 And the simple solution is nuke back or buy spies.If you get outclassed in nuclear combat, it's kind of convenient just to ban nukes don't you think? Ummmm Happiness is a large warchest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George the Great Posted March 28, 2009 Report Share Posted March 28, 2009 You can say no nukes all you want, there will probably be a 95% (+/- 5%) chance of at least one nation launching a nuke after being pissed about losing infra. Then the rest of the dominoes would fall as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted March 28, 2009 Report Share Posted March 28, 2009 You can say no nukes all you want, there will probably be a 95% (+/- 5%) chance of at least one nation launching a nuke after being pissed about losing infra. Then the rest of the dominoes would fall as well. This man knows science Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burning Glory Posted March 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 28, 2009 (edited) well, lets get a list of AA's on board for this war....I would like to get things going and a date picked out. 1. TPF 2. MHA 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. I know there are others per a convo with them but i'll let them speak for their self here. If this doesn't get going then 2 things will happen...one TE will get boring, and two wars will happen anyway BG. Edit* Also, as i thought this would be a friendly war i said no nukes, however if you would like to use nukes then more power to you Edited March 28, 2009 by Burning Glory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingDingaLing Posted March 28, 2009 Report Share Posted March 28, 2009 I know there are others per a convo with them but i'll let them speak for their self here.If this doesn't get going then 2 things will happen...one TE will get boring, and two wars will happen anyway BG. Edit* Also, as i thought this would be a friendly war i said no nukes, however if you would like to use nukes then more power to you Too Late Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Believland Posted March 28, 2009 Report Share Posted March 28, 2009 Now if only the three alliances that I talked to would listen to me, now that would be a war. And before this round ends I would like to say this: I will destroy the bloc in TE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tracer Posted March 28, 2009 Report Share Posted March 28, 2009 well, lets get a list of AA's on board for this war....I would like to get things going and a date picked out.1. TPF 2. MHA 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. I know there are others per a convo with them but i'll let them speak for their self here. If this doesn't get going then 2 things will happen...one TE will get boring, and two wars will happen anyway BG. Edit* Also, as i thought this would be a friendly war i said no nukes, however if you would like to use nukes then more power to you We're in. We do bring nukes however. If it's war, it's war. We have other things brewing if this doesn't work out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tracer Posted March 29, 2009 Report Share Posted March 29, 2009 So Who's In? Who's gonna walk the talk? Thai, BG, things got mighty quiet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burning Glory Posted March 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 29, 2009 UPDATED! I knew LE were in Via our talks, but i wanted them to spek for them selves, now where is the others 1. TPF 2. MHA 3. LE 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. MAN! where are all the AA's who claim TE is boring!! It's going to happen one way or the other so lets just get it out in the open and make it fun for everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tracer Posted March 29, 2009 Report Share Posted March 29, 2009 Come On TE! It's a war game. Let's have a war! Who's In? Let's do this!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panic King Posted March 29, 2009 Report Share Posted March 29, 2009 Come On TE!It's a war game. Let's have a war! Who's In? Let's do this!!! Sorry... we at UW already have our hands filled... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anon1 Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 1. TPF 2. MHA 3. LE 4. OB 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. We most likely will be in. I will contact you if we must pull out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonBoy16 Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Sorry... we at UW already have our hands filled... How crazy would that be if UW and TPF were on the same side in this mega-war? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Janitor Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 This is an old thread now... LE is going to war, we have no friends amymore. don yer battle kilts lads and lassies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tracer Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 If slots 5 through 10 fill in fast, I could be easily swayed. If interest remains low, then we're going to stir the pot on our own, soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natural Disaster Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 But it's pretty hard for my opponent to win if I have 3 Queens and they have none... ----------- Now that's funny. :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilbert Torres Posted April 1, 2009 Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 BG and Thai, I personally think this "Next Big War" would be better if we actually had sides. Such as the allies vs. the axis powers. I think that would hype it up a bit more. And also the use of nukes, but only as last resorts. Those are my thoughts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burning Glory Posted April 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 If slots 5 through 10 fill in fast, I could be easily swayed.If interest remains low, then we're going to stir the pot on our own, soon. I don't see it happening, to many AA's scared of losing there infra...Bad thing is this would be a fair fight and no surprise attacks as the one doing the blitz has the advantage. Besides TPF is in the middle of having our ankles chewed off by UW..They have our slots locked so ATM we are unable to war effectivley in any war, well as we have it already. BG and Thai, I personally think this "Next Big War" would be better if we actually had sides. Such as the allies vs. the axis powers. I think that would hype it up a bit more. And also the use of nukes, but only as last resorts. Those are my thoughts. Thats what we are doing here GT, we are setting up a fair fight.... 1 side vs the other side. Would UN be interested in joining? BG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Venomviper Posted April 1, 2009 Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 Hey BG as for UN joining the war. Well we are preparing for war but we are gettin things together and we will let you soon. Got too many tech raids. Thanks for the Invite though. -Venomviper Minister of Defense/ Tribune Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lehran Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 The Fellowship will answer this call for fun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docus maximus Posted April 13, 2009 Report Share Posted April 13, 2009 Hmmmmm, I guess I should check in here more often. Fark would support this war! And we would bring our nukes. We likes the pretty colors they make when they go BOOM! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OB Sarasate Posted April 13, 2009 Report Share Posted April 13, 2009 So... when's this going to start? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burning Glory Posted April 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 13, 2009 Well since we can't seem to get more peeps to join our war, I say all of us who are wanting some fun just attack all the AA's that didn't sign up for WAR JK!!! Well lets set a date anyways I say on the 22nd we all have sides picked and the 2 sides attack each other on that update.....Anyone else? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth Muscarella Posted April 13, 2009 Report Share Posted April 13, 2009 Well since we can't seem to get more peeps to join our war, I say all of us who are wanting some fun just attack all the AA's that didn't sign up for WAR JK!!!Well lets set a date anyways I say on the 22nd we all have sides picked and the 2 sides attack each other on that update.....Anyone else? sounds good, or maybe even update of 4/23, to give everyone the most time to build/rebuild before it starts. BG, can you possibly edit your original post to add the signup list, and update as people join? i don't know who all is in it besides LE, TPF, MHA, and TF and also, c'mon, people! this is the chance to have a world war! i know there are wars going on right now, but try to keep this block of time open :-D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilbert Torres Posted April 13, 2009 Report Share Posted April 13, 2009 (edited) I know a world war would add a lot of excitement to the game, but why not make it for next round? I for one know that, my alliance has taken a huge hit from these 2 past alliance wars. And because of that we will most likely not be involved in the world war some of you want. I'm not speaking for the whole UN though, as I am not a head leader so do not quote my statement about the UN not participating in this war. But those are just my thoughts, and I'm sure a lot of other's are probably feeling the same way as well. So personally I think a date around the middle of next round would be much more preferred. It will give us more then enough time to grow, let some get nukes, everyone will build up their armies to the best of their ability, and in the end it will truly be an epic war. Edited April 13, 2009 by Gilbert Torres Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts