Maelstrom Vortex Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 (edited) 1. Signatories agree not to war with each other. 2. Signatories of this treaty agree to free trade. 3. Signatories of this treaty grant freedom of military movement through their sovereign domains so long as the intent is solely transit. 4. Signatories of this treaty agree to allow the free flow of capital financing between their respective nations in terms of private investment and ownership. 5. Signatories of this treaty agree to share intelligence of any geostrategic threats to their partners as soon as they become aware. *Top Secret* 6. Signatories of this treaty pledge to co-operate in scientific research and development. (ooc: This allows Signatories to take advantage of a tech-sharing option if they wish and it would be beneficial. Please consult the tech-sharing formula in my signature.) *Top Secret* 7. This treaty may be canceled anytime with a 24 hours Notice. Maelstrom Vortex, -- Chairman of Council of the Dragon Empire Megan Fox -- Vice Chairwoman -- Minster of Diplomacy of the Dragon Empire Chairman Leclerc --Signed for the People's Democratic Socialist Republic of Greater Saboria Edited March 1, 2009 by Maelstrom Vortex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 Signed for the People's Democratic Socialist Republic of Greater Saboria Chairman Leclerc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 A truly good treaty between two honorable nations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 Rebel Virginia objects to Article III. In light of the Dragon Empire's recent attempt to station sea crawlers in the Atlantic it is only plausible to assume that they will take advantage of this treaty to station troops in North America so that they may attack and colonize our nation. Under the terms of this treaty Saboria would have no choice but to allow the Dragon Empire to do this. We petition the PDSR of Greater Saboria to have this article stricken from the treaty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 Rebel Virginia objects to Article III. In light of the Dragon Empire's recent attempt to station sea crawlers in the Atlantic it is only plausible to assume that they will take advantage of this treaty to station troops in North America so that they may attack and colonize our nation. Under the terms of this treaty Saboria would have no choice but to allow the Dragon Empire to do this. We petition the PDSR of Greater Saboria to have this article stricken from the treaty. Your paranoia does you no good. Should the DE use the treaty to station crawlers in our waters with the intent of attacking someone, it would clearly be a violation of the treaty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted February 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 Your paranoia does you no good. Should the DE use the treaty to station crawlers in our waters with the intent of attacking someone, it would clearly be a violation of the treaty. We assure our Rebel Virginia friends in North America if they would read article 3 closely they'd not that the intent must only be transit. There's only one treaty I have which permits the movement of sea-crawlers and that is enacted by Lavo. Since all of our sea-crawlers save the ones used for tectonic, radar, sonar, and tsunami propagation observation have been returned to national waters, this is hardly a justified concern. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 We assure our Rebel Virginia friends in North America if they would read article 3 closely they'd not that the intent must only be transit. There's only one treaty I have which permits the movement of sea-crawlers and that is enacted by Lavo. Since all of our sea-crawlers save the ones used for tectonic, radar, sonar, and tsunami propagation observation have been returned to national waters, this is hardly a justified concern. And where would you be transiting them to? To us perhaps? The wording of this treaty leaves much to be desired. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted February 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 And where would you be transiting them to? To us perhaps? The wording of this treaty leaves much to be desired. "I don't think Saborian waters are between you and the Dragon Empire..." stated Tom Clark, Public Relations Director for the Department of the Chairman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 "I don't think Saborian waters are between you and the Dragon Empire..." stated Tom Clark, Public Relations Director for the Department of the Chairman. You could move your troops into Saboria and attack us from the Great Lakes. That we see as a problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted February 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 "It might be a problem if we're interested in attacking you.. and eh.. we're not." stated Tom Clark. "We're very happy with our current territories." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 "It might be a problem if we're interested in attacking you.. and eh.. we're not." stated Tom Clark. "We're very happy with our current territories." "We only have your word to take for it." stated Secretary of State O'Reilly. "You've made it quite abundantly clear that you are interested in acquiring American territory." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted February 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 (edited) "We only have your word to take for it." stated Secretary of State O'Reilly. "You've made it quite abundantly clear that you are interested in acquiring American territory." "We're willing to accept those who wish to be part of our Empire. We're not seeking to acquire, to adopt maybe, but not to manually take over anything by force or coercion." Tom responded. Edited February 6, 2009 by Maelstrom Vortex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 "We're willing to accept those who wish to be part of our Empire. We're not seeking to acquire, to adopt maybe, but not to manually take over anything by force or coercion." Tom responded. "You will not be acquiring any colonies in the Americas." stated O'Reilly firmly. "And that is final." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 Who said we had any intent on acquiring North American Territory? Time and again we have tried diplomacy then war and we have no grudges against anyone in North America and we are not imperialist.- Megan Fox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDCJT Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 Byzantium is alarmed by this. Why would the Dragon Empire allow the Communists free passage through their lands? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 Byzantium is alarmed by this. Why would the Dragon Empire allow the Communists free passage through their lands? Byzantium is showing a disturbing trend these days, if they are that paranoid concerning anyone calling themselves Communist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDCJT Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 Byzantium is showing a disturbing trend these days, if they are that paranoid concerning anyone calling themselves Communist. We are not paranoid. As far as we are concerned, Communism is a social cancer and a global menace to the world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 We are not paranoid. As far as we are concerned, Communism is a social cancer and a global menace to the world. As far as we are concerned, Communism and Socialism brought Saboria to the greatness that it is today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDCJT Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 As far as we are concerned, Communism and Socialism brought Saboria to the greatness that it is today. So you say. Communism is a failed ideology, a failed human social experiment. History has repeatedly proven that. Both Communism and Socialism claim 'to seek to better things' and as such, but in fact does the exact opposite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 So you say. Communism is a failed ideology, a failed human social experiment. History has repeatedly proven that. Both Communism and Socialism claim 'to seek to better things' and as such, but in fact does the exact opposite. Please provide proof where exactly communism has failed. (OOC: Note that the soviet union likely didn't exist in our form due to no WWII and possibly lack of WWI) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDCJT Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 (edited) Please provide proof where exactly communism has failed. (OOC: Note that the soviet union likely didn't exist in our form due to no WWII and possibly lack of WWI) OOC: Aww...come on. The history of the Soviet Union was the major reason of Byzantium's fiercely anti-Communist tendencies. I need to think other reasons... >.> <.< >.> Edited February 6, 2009 by JEDCJT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 OOC: Aww...come on. The history of the Soviet Union was the major reason of Byzantium's fiercely anti-Communist tendencies. I need to think other reasons... >.> <.< >.> OOC: Just take any other nation that may or may not have been ber-communistic in CNRP-history. =P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 OOC: Like Novaja Zemlya. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 (edited) OOC: Like Novaja Zemlya. OOC: Don't forget Azzar... The New Byzantine Empire played a role in destroying them, I believe... Edited February 6, 2009 by Subtleknifewielder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDCJT Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 OOC: Don't forget Azzar... The New Byzantine Empire played a role in destroying them, I believe... OOC: That, it did. And I've got a feeling that history's about to repeat itself soon... Fun fact: It's not against Saboria. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.