519 Nigras

Would FOK be opposed to me redeclaring after this war? Official response please.

very 9/19/2009 2:01:12 PM Denniswerf Peace Offer

Well, Jerdge must really be inside your head. See if he can sweep up all the dust while he's in there.

So in less words. You sit on the fence?

If you're really that interested then sure thing.

If the OP doesn't mind. We'll just have fun for 7 days, regroup, take inventory and do it again if he so pleases.

Send me your tech.

sent

I, as well, am curious. After remaining steadfast for many years to avoid the spotlight of the OWF and, as a former member (TOP says you don't like me?), what has brought you out from the gopher hole to sign such a nonsensical treaty? As an aside, are you concerned that your history of having a less than stellar performance within this realm, coupled with the signing of such a facetious treaty will further lend itself to the growing perspective that the World Task Force is simply an alliance to join if a nation is looking to save pixels by not taking advantage of all the features offered here on Bob, including this forum?

I really like both parties and all major players involved here. Glad you got it worked out.

Get back in your cage. Who even said you could come out?

Oh Hal. It was worth twice the price if needed.

It was an honour.

Their top nations were, for the most part, in peace mode prior to the war.

If a ROK nation in Anarchy hasn't been hit by a nuke then they are up against once mighty NPO nations near or at ZI with a boat load of tech (in comparison) and a warchest unattainable by the lower NS Rok nations. I rejoined Ragnarok just prior to the war. Fought 9 wars in under 30 days and waited another 70+ for NPO and friends to attack me as none who were in my range were coming out of peace mode. So yes, I'd say they are doing one heck of a job.

Ragnarok will be fine. If NPO was willing to fight things would be a lot different, but as it stands the general population of both Ragnarok and PB share the idea that NPO has been defeated and become a none factor. This is, by in large, because of Ragnarok being Ragnarok. Had another other alliance pulled off what Ragnarok did we'd be talking about their NS loss today. Good job Rok!

Legion (lol) placed me on their PZI list for nuking them in UJW. I told them to bring it but I never saw it come. All is forgotten.

Hello, couple things. Nizzle, you have got to be one of the most thick headed, long winded, and sheepish people to ever grace Digiteria, and if I could headbutt you through my monitor it would easily be worth the replacement cost I would have to absorb buying a new one. Also, I'm looking forward to the coming days/weeks/months when NPO finally puts on their big girl skirts and comes out for a few rounds of war. Until that time my warchest grows. Carry on.

I have a question for Mr. Van Hoo. Van Hoo, I like you. Do you like me?

Yes. In my Country we call it Resisting Arrest or a lesser charge called Obstruction of Justice.

As far as the general membership of both IRON and NPO -- I have mad respect for the members who stay or had stayed to fight. I hold no ill will towards any of the general membership. As far as the influential members, the ones who set precedent for this war, the ones who are just as evil as high ranking government officials, the ones you may refer to as the biggest sheep's of the heard... Well I'd settle for a simple public admission of guilt from most and move on. However, I think I'll reserve judgment until a much later date. If I had to sum it up in one word. Cautious.

I don't think anyone has a grasp on the second option either so maybe you should enlighten them and everyone can put an end to the shenanigans here and move on to more pressing issues such as the release on BnT from Valhalla.

Lesson learned, next time we win we'll need to include a gag order on the owf in the surrender terms.

Forgive me in advance for beating the horse that died on page 12 but I'm curious... Of all the people that should know it's against the social norms and mores of Bob to collude, by yourself or with others, against an alliance that has an opposite point of view than yours does, it's BnT. In or about a year and a half ago BnT showed up on our prestigious Rage forums with a message requesting the expulsion one of our members, who was apparently in collusion with others to bring IRON into a state of war with multiple CN alliances. Sounds like paranoia to me, but alas, that's what the political landscape looked like at the time. For anyone who needs a reminder, it was shortly after the UjW and alliances like IRON and friends were practicing the fine arts of free speech oppression, reparation extortion, and curb stomping lulz alliances. They say people of double standards never experience happiness and because of that I can't help but feel empathetic for dear BnT in this case because, the proper thing to do on Valhalla's behalf would be to expel BnT due to the cold, hard facts that he is plotting to bring Ragnarok into a state of war with multiple CN alliances which is not good for our Karma. http://www.rage-board.com/files/bnt.jpg <---- goodnight, sweet prince.

As have I but only when it's convenient for him. The rule of self interest applies to this guy. From where you're sitting you might not be able to see that my tongue was planted firmly in my cheek.It's not paranoia if he's flat out saying it. I think in the past if something so bold was said in public like this your new friend, BnT, would be brought out into the town square and beat senseless while half the world watched in awe and the other half laughed.