Blackatron

He retired, then Hardin formed Monsters University as a successor alliance to Monsters Inc. Same people everything, except for some reason Hitchcock seemed to be able to find them a way out of curb stomps whilst Hardin has seemingly left them with no friends and no way out.

Agreed. Damn NADC, you guys don't give up ?. Congratulations to COTM and NADC, you've both gained a great ally today.

Seconded good sir.

They went inactive, they weren't deleted (at least not to my knowledge).

OOC: Is this a joke? Now you're requesting moderators not to do their jobs?

Did you really expect them to provide much of quality? Wait what?

You already have the maximum number of border walls it seems.

Junka is my king now? For the moment Steve satisfies the war itch for me, though as you say the conflicts going on aren't exactly very interesting.

My alliance isn't at war, also none of y'all is in my range so far as I can see.

No.

Yeong might nuke you again you know.

I don't see why you felt the need to recognise a state of war with SLAP, since they have actually posted a DoW: I was sure AM posted something, but I can't find it.

Lol, I should really send you some cash next time I have an open slot.

CoTM weren't around when the list war originally made, I don't think Pax or TSC were even around back then.

Top 7 Day Smallest Alliance Gains -1,313,775 Strength Change - Viking Swords

Honestly when I first brought this AA up in the other thread I realised that they seemed a bit suspicious, but I never could have guessed how suspicious: Seemingly 100% aid slot efficiency before they went inactive, no cash sent, only tech. Nations in very close proximity to one another in terms of NS, astoundingly 3 at 147,000 NS within 2 NS of each other. The history of their name on the OWF is like no other alliance: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?/search/&q="viking swords"&page=19 Most of them have basically no casualties, the exception being their top guy, who I believe has been on the wrong end of a few upper tier raids. Nations with 9 wonders with political lobbyist. Owner seems to have named the AA after himself. Claims to have treaties in the alliance description, no evidence of any treaties. Almost all of them stop logging on at the same time. Anything else? BTW +ULFBERH+T means https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulfberht_swords Kingzog, what does his warchest look like?

These "guys" tech slave harder than I do, and I take pride in my tech slaving.

Actually I was more referring to the number of votes they got, their voters obviously weren't all internal, was NpO voting for VS senator?

Very strange that they have a senate seat as well. Also the 4 nations within my range (I'm 24K NS) look unusually... soft, like no MPs, no SDIs, not even a pentagon, for most alliances the nations in this range are generally quite wonder heavy.

It would be very amusing if his current alliance posts here attempting to recruit him... I'm not particularly interested in advertising on the OWF, I am no longer a recruiter by trade anyway, though if TTK looks interesting to you feel free to PM me. What I do wish to say is; is your 'neglect' in any way of your own making? Maybe alliances should have IA guys regularly messaging their members, but the reality is many aren't active enough or are simply too large for each individual member to be kept track of, unless you take an active role in approaching the correct people and demanding a proper trade circle/tech buyers et cetera then it might be difficult to expect that you will automatically receive loads of help.

FTFY What would you bet on him coming back and damaging you?

I noticed all of that, indeed I happened to be looking at that AA because I was checking the aid slot usage of various AAs. The implications were not lost on me, I simply avoided mentioning it in order to avoid starting any sort of moderation discussion.

Might be sooner: http://www.cybernations.net/alliance_display.asp?Page=1&Order=DESC&Field=Status&ID=13098 Their owner is 3 weeks inactive, all 3 heirs are more than 3 weeks inactive, the most active person on the AA is only active this week. I don't know if they have treaties or allies or anything TBH, but it may be worth just declaring on the heir or one of the owners just to give them the email notification.

I don't want to come across too antagonistic here, (largely because I already made a thread pointing out this incident the day it happened, at the time I assumed everyone would notice imminently but in hindsight I'm concerned that some of the raids against your members may have been the result of my thread, which I promise was in no way my intention) but honestly you demean yourself quite a bit by saying you are the "real Mostly Harmless Alliance". I'm sure you were just attempting to provide clarity, but in reality I think it simply provides more recognition of the "fake" MHA than it deserves.

This sequence is essentially my life #techslave