F15pilotX

Good luck ya'll.

I'll go with this.

I find this almost as amusing as the image.

That's so clever, no one thought of it yet.Oh wait.

Didn't Polar just declare war on \m/ ?

That answers my question quite nicely as well. Funny how that works.

You know how to read dates, correct?

So anyway, when are ya'll planning on backing up your treaty? I hear a lot of talking and no action.

Rather, he finds it ironic that \m/ is all pissed about it being turned around on them, I do believe.

I couldn't pass that one up, even if I've done it before as well Touché

Last time I checked, \m/ weren't their allies. Rather the opposite.

The ability to spell is the first step on the road to being able to debate.

I would link you to the OP, but it would be a waste of time.

I like what I see here. Good luck, my friends. It's the pip.

I believe the point he was trying to make is that Vox were not the ones that physically took down the NPO, not that the way Vox went about trying to accomplish this was weak.Then again, I could be mistaken.

True. Nowhere did I imply that I did so, and inferring such is unnecessary and inaccurate. I merely was getting you to clarify your previous point, which you did.edit - made the quotes separate.

A weak person cannot take from others because they do not have the power to. As to principles, while you may not like how someone else acts, but everyone lives by certain principles, whether they realize it or not. With decency, again, that is a matter of person opinion; Starfox's post and the subsequent responses have made that abundantly clear. Oh, and it's rather ironic that you speak about treating others with respect in the first part of the sentence, and proceed to do the exact opposite one phrase later. Need to be a bit more specific methinks.

Let me get this straight. BECAUSE the NPO signed terms in which other alliances promised to protect it, the NPO should have to protect itself? Makes perfect sense. Anyway, I can agree on one thing; sleep is a good thing.

Why thank you. Personally, I had gone three years here before now without knowing how to fight a war. Sadly, it did not answer the question. Nice way of getting around it though.

Which says nothing about it being 'easy to drive off'.

Do tell, how is a nation with three times your soldiers + tanks and possibly aircraft easy to drive off?

Yes, because with 30% soldiers and no tanks & aircraft, you can be just SO effective in wars. Regardless of the spin you wish to put on it, you as well as I know that any attempts to attack a ghost with those kind of limitations would be utterly futile. My mistake on the technicality though.

Much less efficient than simply contacting the proper officials on IRC.

It's in the name.

Oh wait, under terms we CAN'T attack ghosts if they don't want to leave the AA. I'm not debating about whether or not their response is reasonable, but come on man, think before you post.