Malkavian

Fat stacks with super packs.

My taste-buds, mmansfield68. :P

He (YOLO SWAG) told me so, silly. :)

No, it's not Doitzel, mmansfield68 although YOLO SWAG simply dawned a new avatar similar.

I want to invite you to coffee. Join me at the University to discuss more.

Does the flag have watermarks on it, Franz?

What good chaps, the Marxists. Good luck!

I know my word isn't worth a darn in relation to the terms of surrender for Loki Laufeyson, but I think he should post a picture of him eating ice cream as his punishment. :P

I actually like the flag, too. I would contemplate enlisting in Team Rocket if only for the flag. I do not understand the theme though.

Congratulations! I wish you the best of luck.

This was a refreshing post.:D

Epic paperwork.

Bah, I know enough. And to you too.

So what do you eat when watching a film?

No. Quiet.

Gonna try a little harder, It could be sweet.

That is preposterous, Mogar. What, did you bend the rules? The majority have specific criteria for what constitutes an alliance. I am guessing you're the exception.

What?

tl;dr: I spoke from a different point of view. Deal with it, Hello.

Who is Starfox101 again?

Yes, but GOONS might because they are not DOOMBIRD DOOMCAVE and have their own policy on surrendering foes. What is the punishment for aiding an embedded criminal, Emperor Marx?

Everyone loves popcorn. :P

You barely registered that little fact? Shame on you, Mr. Gross. The dilemma I duly noted was an approach at narrative perspective. I did not manipulate your [intended] point, but mounted an opposing point of view. The subject (noun) of your fragment sentence was the issue of courtesans being exchanged in the diplomatic process. No clause has ever been written to include the trade of women for a treaty nor where terms adjusted in your original treaty to warrant the conclusion. A perspective is a point of view that differentiates by (literal) interpretation of the point made. You confounded that the treaty was cancelled due to failure to satisfy the prerequisite that ladies be gifted to continue the peace, yes? Why would that be included if you already had women in your alliance? Why stress that point beyond other pressing matters in cancellation? Where is the clause in your treaty that mandates this? I had another point of view, Mr. Gross. I am terribly sorry I got you knickers in-a-bunch.

Assisting a war criminal is not the wisest course of action, Methrage. I suggest forgoing the notion altogether unless you desire imminent destruction by GOONS.