Jump to content

fant0m

Banned
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    443

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Blog Comments posted by fant0m

  2. Haflinger

    Posted

    Looks like Fark do need help after all. :lol1:

    http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=224996

    http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=207194

    Fark has 14 nations at 100K NS or higher. NEW currently has nine. Yes, the advantage is on Fark's side, but you certainly wouldn't need 10M NS more to level the playing field.

    They might not anymore but Fark had 23 nations above 100k when this war began. They currently have 35 nations above 90k, we have 12.

  3. Haflinger

    Posted

    Perhaps a few million NS worth of nations should "join" International, TPE, and Fark. Level the playing field so to speak. NEW certainly couldn't complain about that.

    C'mon man, I know we're pretty good fighters but it is NEW who would need at least another 10mil NS to "level the playing field". We're fighting Fark, one of the most well respected high NS military alliances around, not UPN.

  4. Haflinger

    Posted

    every NEW nation over 15k has totally filled slots. The 21 ghosts adding 1.8 million NS to NEW however can make it appear that we are doing a very poor job of our war. The ironic thing about this all is the ghosts just mean it will take much longer for NEW to hit the total NS we agreed they should lose before they paid enough for their crime and we called off the attacks, good times indeed.

    So the bigger NEW grows the longer this war goes on? Considering neither side seems to care about losses that is extremely good news indeed.

  6. Poyplemonkeys

    Posted

    Friends of friends are not your friends. For instance, you may be treatied to alliance x but not alliance y, if alliance y is treatied to alliance x, alliance y does not magically become your friend and your treaty partner.

    You disgraced a longstanding friend and ally in NEW with your inaction. You've lost sight of what's important, you've become something that PC was never meant to become, and was started in a very clear attempt to get away from. You've become a puppet of politics.

    NEW deserves better than what you've given them.

    C'mon greenacres. I know you're upset about Derwood kicking you out but you don't have to troll every thread/blog posted on this war.

    They may not be our friends who attacked NEW but it would have meant slapping several of our very close friends in the face over the mistake of another friend. Derwood did what he honestly believed was the right thing to do. Either path available to him would have ended with some people upset. I think it's clear he made the right decision when the main opponents of the decision are people who could be described as enemies of PB.

    Everyone seems to be making out like NEW were attacked without provocation and PC/iFOK just decided not to honour a treaty because we're scared of losing infra.

  7. Poyplemonkeys

    Posted

    We didn't write the TPF NAP, they did right before they forced us to sign it. We also followed it to the letter and have it on good authority it was purposely written in that matter so they could do the same to us in reverse.

    And anyone calling us cowards can try being in our situation. In order to defend a friend over their own foolish mistake we would have had to slap our other friends in the face by attacking their friends when we weren't obligated to do so.

    We declared on Polar in the last war thinking it would mean us all going to ZI because that was a clear cut situation. Can you really not see the awful position ourselves and iFOK were put in? I think those criticizing us are either completely blind or just disappointed they don't get to see the people they hate the most blow each other apart.

×
×
  • Create New...