Jump to content

Roi Loup

Members
  • Posts

    376
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Roi Loup

  1. [quote name='Arthur Blair' timestamp='1290047456' post='2516390'] This is a strawman. Are you trying to claim that we did dictate what another alliance did? The same goes for Ivan a few posts back. Your attempt at spinning this into the Kingdom having done something DIRE beyond a Baron posting a minor announcement thread is futile. And possibly just a little bit silly. [/quote] strawman my ass. no one cares if youre butt hurt because someone kicked out 2/8 of your diplomats. stop trying to take the high horse when no one could careless
  2. [quote name='Seerow' timestamp='1290042936' post='2516302'] When two diplomats are removed without any hostile behavior however, it is most definitely something worth noting. Neither tamerlane or myself did anything wrong to warrant the demasking, which is where the reaction comes in. [/quote] not your right to dictate what other alliance do. far as im concerned they could close all their embassies and i wouldnt bat an eye
  3. [quote name='Kzoppistan' timestamp='1290008168' post='2515901'] I read the first page and skipped all the stupid so I could append my stupid to this, surely, fine thread. This announcement pleases me. Expelling diplomats could be construed as a grave insult, of course, but it certainly gets your point across. I consider it akin to a slap in the face with a glove. Too many chicken !@#$% afraid of voicing a dissenting opinion around here. So many people would rather spread their malicious back biting under the covers. So, we need more of this. [/quote] so youre not welcome to have a diplomat there.. it might be rude but i wouldnt fight someone if they told me to get out of their house
  4. what about if i lose tech from being attacked? do i get paid?
  5. [quote name='Locke' timestamp='1289966117' post='2515653'] My mask got knocked off for a night or so, can we declare on you? Okay, finally caught up. I see NPO has come forth with some information, good. If we completely take their word for it, we get something, well, not more outrageous than expelling diplomats (and they really shouldn't have masked them till they were ready, someone made a blunder there). I also saw a claim from, I believe it was Drai, that one of his posts was actually edited, not deleted. What was the pre- and post-edit state there? OOC: !@#$@#$ autocorrect. >.< [/quote] probably nothing if it cant be posted here..
  6. [quote name='BDRocks' timestamp='1289889724' post='2514240'] To piggyback on this. It is because of our set of ideals no war was started over this unlike NPO would have. [/quote] who cares what the npo would have done? youre not the npo man..
  7. [quote name='StevieG' timestamp='1289601355' post='2511397'] But why should Catharsis have to play by your rules? Just because you think they shouldnt attack nations that are not involved doesnt mean they dont think differently. They may be wanting to send a signal, and whilst they will rightly be crushed for creating an AA war out of this, you will likely not bother them next round. Maybe TPC will look more closely at their war screens in the coming rounds because of this mess? Anyways, I recommend resetting the amount of nations an AA must have for it not to be a legal raid. An AA of 14 members can be a credible and potentially powerful factor. [/quote] if they didnt attack why should they be punished? its like condemning a witness of a murder to death just for seeing it..
  8. $9m?! lots of damages or someones getting greedy
  9. does anyone have anything new to add or is it just going to be the same thing over and over again
  10. [quote name='StevieG' timestamp='1289422160' post='2509592'] Catharsis have 14 nations. Thats kind of on the higher end of tech raiding. DR allows for 10 or less, and we do go 2 or 3 on 1, but usually those guys will raid full slots, so will be like 3 on 3, with the advantage definitely to the raiders. This is for a few reasons. Co ordination is practised, and the likelyhood of the raidee peacing out is high. Maybe they will send a few CMs, but they will peace out if they value their nation. My best advice for raidees is to send 2 CMs and a peace offer if you get raided. If the raider has any brains, they will peace out and not re visit that particular nation again. If they just want a war then they might escalate it, but that should be handled by AA leadership. Competent AA leadership should not turn a raid into a beat down. However, if the raidee refuses to peace out at all, and continues to be a thorn in the side of a larger AA then I dont see anything wrong with individually destroying these nations. If, as a raidee, you want to make your point as to not get raided again, then make your point short and quick, there is no point destroying your nation trying to make a point to a larger AA, unless that provides you with a source of fun of course . Also, I would suggest AAs of 10 or less should look for protection from a friendly larger AA. Some AAs wont give protection, others will. Bear in mind that the competent AAs who will give protection will not put up with BS from a smaller AA either. So if you really want protection, dont go spoil your good faith with your protector by starting up all kinds of trouble for them. [/quote] i dont mind rerolling after a war tbh. raid me and ill fight back. idc if i get killed its all just for fun.
  11. [quote name='Yevgeni Luchenkov' timestamp='1289429970' post='2509713'] Hey, Archon found the reps a bit high but RV found them perfect. Chump change, even. You can claim that they were too high, sure, but your side can't say that they're too high and yet, at the same time, call them chump change. Also, if we're going to face a massive "Karmaic" war because of 15m and if that's the best you have, I think it will be a long time coming. Good thing is I'll finally be able to buy a WRC, I guess. [/quote] nso was killed for less if you remember
  12. what happens if that 10 man alliance is stronger than you?
  13. [quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1289373345' post='2509142'] Every one has a brain, everyone also has biases, and I would hope everyone here has loyalties to their alliance and to their allies. [/quote] and not everyone uses it either. biases.. yea id be more biased if i didnt use my brain to make up my own mind ey?
  14. [quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1289372837' post='2509134'] Its not big of a deal to suggest that people stick up for their treaty partners not just in war, but in the OWF as well. Many treaties these days even mention something along the lines of treating each with respect in public. Any moron can look at the OWF, and in about twenty minutes figure out that you can predict what side of an argument some one will take based on their AA and what section of the treaty web that AA is on. So you can spare us all your righteous indignation crap. [/quote] i like my alliance. i like to think for myself. my emperor might be awesome but i still have a brain to think with thanks.
  15. idc if im raided just as long as im not nuked for defending myself like what just happened recently.. it forces me to reroll since i cant even fight a proper war anymore
  16. if you can make #2 blue then i can do oil+uranium http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=410503
  17. Roi Loup

    Blue 8BR

    got oil and uranium yet?
  18. Team: Blue Nation Name: Royaume Loup National Leader: Roi Loup Link to Nation:http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=410503 Your Resources: oil+uranium Needed Resources: need good circle
  19. i dont know anyone who would want to play cn so why do i have to be reminded about the referral thing every 3 days?? its just getting annoying to have to click ignore every 3 days seriously
  20. [quote name='ddog241' timestamp='1285825966' post='2469457'] thank god for lulz alliances! if it wasn't for lulz CN would be a very boring place [/quote] depends on the lulz
  21. kodiac declares war on kodiac.. nice
  22. id like to congratulate myself for reading the whole thread and gcu for terminating them o/ loup o/ gcu
  23. [quote name='Sardonic' timestamp='1285941529' post='2471029'] A politically expedient target? Clearly you're mistaking the blabber here for the real political environment. You almost literally could not have picked a worse target, for reasons you'll find out soon enough. [/quote] goons will call in more allies? sorry. couldnt resist
  24. [quote name='JT Jag' timestamp='1285901150' post='2470596'] So they took offense to our being on the defense? [/quote] my guess is that exactly. your defense strategy of allies aiding you offended them. idk im not them but thats my guess
×
×
  • Create New...