Dathtoal

[quote name='Matthew PK' date='08 May 2010 - 10:45 PM' timestamp='1273373090' post='2291997'] Again, our government *has* explained what unconditional surrender means. [/quote] Anyone with working synapses knows what unconditional surrender means, except you and your government. You guys are done. Enjoy the ride.

Good to see the reps waived.

Happy 4th fellas o/

[quote name='flak attack' date='21 April 2010 - 08:14 PM' timestamp='1271895251' post='2269857'] He was insulting TORN. I was insulting IRON, though I'm beginning to see the merits of his idea. [/quote] Either way, it didn't make it any funnier. But maybe you'd like to compare what TORN and/or IRON are doing compared to what the RAMlins are doing to put some validity behind the uncreative insults? Go.

[quote name='flak attack' date='21 April 2010 - 06:09 PM' timestamp='1271887738' post='2269661'] I take it you will be dropping your IRON treaty, right? [/quote] Wasn't funny when kriekfreak used that tired bit the first time two pages ago. Try to keep up.

[quote name='kriekfreak' date='21 April 2010 - 05:15 PM' timestamp='1271884528' post='2269549'] Someone has to treaty TORN right? [/quote] If TORN hits the crack pipe one to many times and tries to pull a RAMlin, I'll toss on the tard t-shirt. Till then, you're blowing smoke.

[quote name='Ryuzaki' date='21 April 2010 - 04:55 PM' timestamp='1271883303' post='2269517'] Why would we want an ally to get rolled? [/quote] Why would you want clinically retarded allies?

Grats Mike717

[quote name='rsoxbronco1' date='08 March 2010 - 04:51 PM' timestamp='1268085354' post='2218330'] Sure, I think you still have our terms on file. We're only a phone call away. [/quote] Yup. [img]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_oV3YeL3kSJQ/SyvmjBzY7TI/AAAAAAAAAdo/071xnP5zceY/S660/trash+can.jpg[/img] Be sure to wait by the phone.

[quote name='Schattenmann' date='06 March 2010 - 12:03 AM' timestamp='1267852103' post='2215671'] Exactly. Yet read up, or pick any other thread at random, and that's the only argument you see. [/quote] I haven't read anything that suggests reps are the [i]only[/i] variable to war frequency, just that they [i]are[/i] a variable that lowers it.

[quote name='Schattenmann' date='05 March 2010 - 11:55 PM' timestamp='1267851604' post='2215667'] Wars have been happening at the [i]same frequency[/i] for years while reps have been going [i]DOWN[/i]. The idea that largely eliminating or vastly decreasing reps will increase the frequency of war flies in the face of reality and history. [/quote] The idea that reps are the only variable that determines war frequency flies in the face of reality.

I'm somewhat like minded. I am big fan of war and I'm not here to get along or make best-friends-forever. Here to blow !@#$ up. Win/lose...fighting is fun. Reps are pathetic though.

War is fun. Let it ride.

Nuts.

[quote name='Dochartaigh' date='20 February 2010 - 12:49 AM' timestamp='1266644945' post='2193094'] yeah because i have no idea what they mean. here because i tire of this silly argument. much    /mʌtʃ/ Show Spelled [muhch] Show IPA adjective,more, most, noun, adverb,more, most. –adjective 1. great in quantity, measure, or degree: too much cake. much (mŭch) adj. more (môr, mōr), most (mōst) Great in quantity, degree, or extent: not much rain; much affection. n. 1. A large quantity or amount: Much has been written. 2. Something great or remarkable: The campus wasn't much to look at. adv. more, most 1. To a great degree or extent: much smarter. so from these definition we can gather that if much of the reason for war was the whole CnG is a future threat thing, then given the context it is put in, [b]it means that the greatest quantity [/b]of the reason for war was the future threat. otherwise it would have read something like "the second reason for this war is blah blah blah". now, will ya'll just admit you are wrong and give it up. the greatest reasoning for this war as given by TOP was CnG being a threat and not helping Polaris. [/quote] I'm perfectly aware that you have no idea what they mean, hence my post. 'Much' does not mean the greatest quantity. Never has, never will. That is where you fail. But the 'greatest quantity' is the [i]exact[/i] definition on 'Most': Main Entry: 1most Pronunciation: \ˈmōst\ Function: adjective Etymology: Middle English, from Old English mǣst; akin to Old High German meist most, Old English māra more — more at more Date: before 12th century 1 : [b]greatest in quantity[/b], extent, or degree <the most ability> 2 : the majority of <most people> Any questions?