Random

I respectfully disa---Jesus did you have to bite me? Okay fine. I am a sheep in Tyga's herd and as such he is almighty and all knowing, also he bites.

I find all of Chron's points to be pretty valid, and though it would have done better to have used quotes from other players instead of just Bob so people wouldn't be constantly saying that this is some type of grudge post it is easier to research one player then many.

When I heard he died I blankly stared at the one that told me for a good 30 seconds before saying two words---so what?

I believe I explained why in my edit that your system would not work very well. Though I do wonder who this "Tiga" is that you speak of..Very interesting.

That make absolutely no sense, why would an alliance any alliance vote to expel another alliance with 1 vote and then with the second vote they decide to do the opposite is just..well the picture below will explain better then I could. Edit : I feel the need to elaborate more on it as it just comes off as ignorant of me to just state something with no evidence as to why it wouldn't make sense. The thing is that Hizzy's point was that at most of the Citadel didn't support the idea of OG sharing their ideals etc. Hizzy then said that OG would have AT MOST 1 friend in Citadel if any of the said alliances voted to not remove OG, you then said that each alliance has 2 votes which wouldn't change anything. I mean if any of those alliances decide to cast 1 vote to each side that would show that the government of the said alliance was indecisive and thus they would be still debating over it and the point of the vote would essentially be non-existent and said alliance would have done better not to vote at all as they're obviously having their own internal struggles if they can't cast the same vote twice. Which would lead to the vote not being fair to the said alliance you would be voting on because if the X alliance that was voting for the removal or not of Y alliance and put 1 to each because they couldn't decide and then later on decided that the Y alliance shouldn't have been removed then your only creating internal strife and more over corruption.

In the jungle the mighty jungle the tiger sleeeeppss tonight. I like it..

Tigers on shrooms will never get old.

No demented would be "baby eating" as your kind likes to call it over there in Pacifica. Congratulations though you managed to make me shake my head in disappointment.

Everytime a member of the NPO posts one of those "Why I'm NPO" threads a cow is brutally tortured, murdered, and then BBQ'd. Namely one that likes to call himself "Moo-tang clan."

Don't get me wrong I never said that I had no morality, I do and it belonged with the Karma side. (though I also agree some people took that morality to a level that wasn't necessary) I do believe in Karma but on a different standard, I believe the following quote will explain my personal opinion on it accurately "For ever action there is an equal and opposite reaction." It took a heck of along time for that opposing reaction but it happened. Also "the right reasons" comes back to ones own point of view, for example some people would think that it was wrong for the NPO to attack OV, while others might say otherwise. In any case if you believe in what your doing is right then that should be good enough for the said person to do whatever they feel is necessary to uphold those said beliefs.

[OOC]You can't compare a RL murder to a destruction of 1's and 0's followed by a possible humiliation on the internet, it just doesn't work.[/OOC]

Why? I just finished saying I don't care if or what others opinions of me are and what makes you think you have that right to tell me what to do? Who are you to judge me anyway?

I feel the need to go further into this, only a bit though since I don't like putting so much effort into posting and in this game in general . Justice is part of a persons point of view, both sides of a conflict for example will think that their side has justice on it. (at least I'd hope so otherwise why else would they be fighting?) Not everybody is going to agree that one side is just and right, if they did and everybody agreed then there would be no justice, morality, or war. Everybody would be in perfect harmony and war wouldn't exist in the first place as well as these words would have no use or meaning. Although on the flip side I guess you could argue that justice would lie in what which the majority of the world or bob in this case leans too but then that would mean that justice was with the NPO for the past two years, which is possible but then this war's meaning or the meaning that people have been spouting would not exist.

This is me not caring. Unless I have a direct connection, i.e ; they're a friend. I honestly don't care what they have to say or tell me. I'll act how I want and nobody else can tell me otherwise. @Sal : I'm not mocking you one bit, you have the right to express your own opinions and ideals, I was just stating my own in turn.

To be frank I don't give a crap how the terms are dictated to any of the alliances of the Hegemony. It doesn't concern me one bit.

As I'm not in charge of any alliance at all on either side I couldn't say it was as my earlier post reflects on myself and my own beliefs. Do I personally believe it was strategic? Yes it was as we see the results were satisfactory to most.

If your asking if it was executed in a much better fashion then the noCB war then yes it is.

My point being is morality was just the point of view of the winning side this time, was there actually any morality in war or has there ever been morality in war? No, war has no room for morality it is and always has been kill or be killed. That may not completely apply in the cyber verse but it more or less holds true up to the point of "kill or be killed" since you can't actually die on a computer game.

Will you remake \m/? Toshiro Hitsugaya OR Yoruichi Shihoin? Explain your answer. Tigers or Cows? Do you think Moo-Cows should be known as THE hamburger from now on?

All this snuggling leads me to one question : What does a Tiger and a Viper make..?

Sponge would take the cake as Viceroy, that's probably the worst possible insult we could throw the NPO's way

Oh so apparently Grub is incompetent now? New's to me. A Polar that isn't run by Sponge, that would be tLC

Poll lacks Tygaland aka "Bizarro-Moo"

Well we're always talking about how we can steal all of tyga's twinkies so it wasn't all bad