Jump to content

Owned-You

Banned
  • Posts

    3,220
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Owned-You

  1. Round 3 Update Anyone? I'm aware that an update would be pointless at this point as it's subject to change by the hour, but I for one like the novelty of such thing's. Not to mention, I'm too lazy to do one myself.
  2. Interesting, hopefully there is a counter-bloc to polarize CN:TE. That said, Congratulations to all the signatories of this bloc.
  3. I've always liked you guys, cause you like blowing things up and I like blowing things up. (Although we blew each other's stuff up last round) That said blow stuff up.../redundancy Congrats on the milestone
  4. Good to see my former alliance giving Rd 3 a run
  5. Yeah, I personally plan on playing this upcoming one differently. It's been my goal to change my style of play each round. This round I was intent on doing as much damage to others possible without regard to my own nations safety. This upcoming round it's my goal to stick with one nation and become nuclear capable. It's just my way of keeping things interesting for myself.
  6. Aye, it's been a good show...let's make round 3 a better one!
  7. I'm 688 days old, I came into the game around when GWII was kicking off. I remember the simplicity of things back then...and I miss it. I can still remember when receiving 500k in aid was something amazing. Not to mention the good ole' commie bashes. But I'd say I overall miss most of the "Lulz" alliances, you guys made this game interesting and it gave the more serious players an antithesis to fight against on the forums.
  8. Finally someone else besides my alliances goes to war against the odds for fun Have Fun & Kill Stuff!
  9. Just want to make a point, NAAC did not go to war with IDIOT over morals it was nothing more then they were the dominant super-power and we wanted someone to fight. We went in with the same notion in our war with Murder Inc. We didn't attempt to actively dethrone either with much effort. We simply went to war...no real goals other then to do that make peace and move on. -- Now, onto another thing. Stop with the whole "We play better" nonsense. I'd reckon the majority of players don't play with a serious mindset and organized structure with goals. So to make the notion that "Your better" you'd have to compare yourself with the rest of the populace...and since the majority aren't "Playing" under that notion it's a moot point. It's very condescending and not needed in this game. That's the type of stuff that made CN boring, and I personally don't want to see it on CN:TE. That said, it's been a fun round. I personally put 14 people into anarchy while only going into anarchy once I ate two nukes as well. Which is like a badge of honor in NAAC and the only reason I ever went into anarchy. So as you can tell my e-pen for this round is large. I've also had the pleasure of meeting many cool players. So with all that said, let's hope the good times keep rolling! B)
  10. Indeed, let's hope things start spicing up after reset.
  11. Actually, less treaties could equate to more wars. Simply because if you have an alliance with no treaties, that alliance act's like a prick to a bunch of alliances. That alliance will get romped for it. If nobody act's like a prick, nobody pays for it. All treaties do is act as a deterrent, much like nuclear weapons do. Treaties only serve as a way to exert political power and ensure that whomever holds the most weight in the treaty web will succeed in winning the game. Simply because they will have all the major players in there pocket, and easily eliminate any would-be usurpers who seek to challenge there authority. It makes the game far less interesting, unless you have a counter treaty-power. And I personally know that my alliance isn't playing the treaty game...
×
×
  • Create New...