kenny

the funniest part of this war is how TOP went from working to better relations between us after they got axed in there war to jumping on the MK bandwagon, how quickly you adopted there same attitude.

maybe they didn't agree with your set up and unlike all the other lemmings you are going to have support your side even tho most won't believe it don't care about morals, they just won't to attack the enemy. LOL AT YOU VE, how far youve fallen, but we have always said we wern't evil just products of power and you and MK are showing the world how right we are. say hello to sethB, we miss him over at the pacific forums, and hope to see him and you all for that matter again.

god damn double posts, yes i know we were one of the main offenders but i think we are a very different alliance that is finally drinking that Friends > Infra coolaid you were all talking about before, congrats you converted us.

I long for a day when CN consists of different blocs that arn't all attached to each other and have bloc wars that start and end with just the involved blocs, no game ruining alliances signing multiple blocs or alliances that treaty blocs, just everyone sticking to there bloc and only THERE BLOC!

NPO4life

[quote name='Sal Paradise' date='21 March 2010 - 04:43 PM' timestamp='1269153816' post='2232001'] Kinda pointless don't you think? [/quote] more like extremly pointless, it makes you think oh wow GGA is doing good things on the green sphere lets all applaud them about doing squat! next the NPO will announce we will be non hostile to all the red alliances, BUT WAIT....... thats already happening. nice try JB but come back when you actually have something to announce.

The only chance Neo-Hegomony has is to cause a rift between SuperComplaints, anything short of this will just end in another curbstomp, lets look at it shall we. The idea that they try to intergrate into the new world order might be somewhat possibble for the fringe NeoHeg but the main players will never be accepted and liked by the majority so when the next fight came they would just end up the targets again or if they refused to fight be called out about it. The isolation idea is by far my favourite and its exactly what the smart thing to do is if it wern't for one small little problem! If NeoHeg didn't give S&C a reason to declare on them they would simply make one up! see the blue ball war for an example of this. no matter how you want to cut it short of a civil war between S&G there won't be anyone else left to beat on besides NeoHeg.

enjoy the warning!

your side has always been a bunch of complainers but i always thought this was due to you being on the losing side, now i see that youve got the victim mentality so deeply ingrained that no matter what supposedly evil acts you or your allies do you will just scream and carry on about us doing it 1st or try to redifine morality whenever its suits you. Heres an idea for you bros, shut up and fight the war, your side is clearly smashing the other and yet they complain far less and act far more honourably then yours. Enjoy SuperComplaints reign as top dog as you undoubtably will be after youve mopped up the opposition, because if you can't even enjoy being the overlords of cn then whats the point of being up there!

[quote name='kulomascovia' date='17 February 2010 - 05:04 PM' timestamp='1266390286' post='2187258'] I'm sure most of you have seen the issue of aiding a nation at war arise during this particular war. The arguments presented in other threads and the messages that some alliances have been sending to nations aiding their enemies have incited me to ask this question: if a neutral party enters in a commercial agreement with nations at war without regard to their affiliation, does this constitute an act of war against their opponents? If so, why? I've had another leader (ooc) a friend (/ooc) ask me why he was requested by a certain alliance (alliance a) to cease his tech deals with members of another alliance (alliance b). Not only was he requested to cease his tech deals, but he was also told that military actions will be taken against his nation should he not comply with the demands of alliance a. The leader had little knowledge of the current conflict and his nation engages in tech deals with anyone. Is it fair to attack neutral parties for their financial dealings? From what I gather, most people here consider this to be justified. I would like to ask why. What buisness do alliances have with a neutral party who is minding its own buisness? One possible argument I've heard is that aiding your enemy would impair your war efforts. Well, so do nukes. The GRL has detrimental effects to the economy. Does this mean a concerned alliance should attack nations that nuke? Should an alliance with low ns nations attack an alliance with high ns due to the fact that the high ns alliance increases the ns required to be above 5% and thus prevents the small ns alliance from getting nukes without getting an MP? Discuss. [/quote] Of course its an act that should and usually does result in war, any help be it money, tech or troops will aid in your targets defense/aggresion so while it may not be malicious in nature its damaging and thus looked at negativly. whether a neutral should be attacked or forced to pay reps to the other side is probably not what alot of people would like to see, there aid is an easily traceable and bringing them to punishment can also be quite easy. As for your points about GRL, all i have to say is lol. Goodluck trying to attack everyone firing nukes, while they might be hurting everyone its just a uncontrollable or punishable part of CN that we learnt to live with. top 5% aye, yes all low nations should endevour to attack everyone stronger then them as alliance rank shouldn't be the only goal a nation has, colour dominance, alliance dominance, nation rank dominance are all fun goals to strive for!

thanks for killing CN's entertaiment for the week!

make sure you wash and scrub well after touching this filth echelon.

The reason everyone is laughing or attacking this stupid declaration is because this is one of the many dumb things KD has done since leaving the new pacific order, his blind hatred of us whilst giving us many threads to laugh at him in, only further damages his bleak reputation, and this is just the cherry on the cake! Look at it this way, If NPO wanted to exclude every other alliance on red and UED (not actually a red alliance) we could do it easily and get away with it and the old us would have. Like it or not we have changed whilst some of us were against this change we had to adapt or become extinct.

Well since the all knowing Timeline saids it, it must be true. In that case welcome schatenman to the NPO ranks once again all that time youve been publically hating on us was clearly our clever ploy to grow and cultervate the communities ill will!

1. We will obviously change hopefully in a positive way, my guess we will become less outgoing and try to become a economic superpower rather then a military superpower. But moo the benevolent is no longer leader, lets see if CHUCKY has a mean streak or is another softy. 2. Epic EVIL would befall you all, probably followed by some kickass wars and then the goody goodies would try to run us out of the game for being "ebil" aka FUN. 3. See above but but more severe!