Jump to content

Obiwan

Members
  • Posts

    291
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Obiwan

  1. you guys did your part and it was an honor. o/ white peace
  2. wait, does this make for 4 fronts? maybe now my slots will fill up.
  3. that made for an interesting read. I like the monty python reference
  4. I just wanted to be sure. Some people actually do feel that it is dishonorable to surrender as an alliance. I am glad to know that you aren't one of them.
  5. that is not what I was doing. I was seriously asking a question. Apparently, and now it is cleared up. And thank you for not contributing.
  6. ok, so you weren't talking about defending NPO directly. I see. So the subject was 2 different people. My apologies for confusing them. ok, so if your alliance you're defending surrenders they are "pathetic" because they "wouldn't go to ZI for their cause?" (I think those were the words used, I apologize in advance if I misquoted)
  7. oh, I was under the impression you'd never surrender. so are your previous statements false?
  8. I don't see how you could be pissed off at them but gladly die for them in the same post.
  9. sad. peace is right at your fingertips.
  10. I am not fooled by you Sith. We may fight along side each other today, but the ultimate goal is for peace and not for personal gain.
  11. you're right. So long as you keep trying to attack, hopefully you'll help grow our war boner. If you are unfamiliar, please refer to my sig.
  12. the most sound CB ever. not 1, not 2, but 3 good reasons for declaring. \o/ Härmlins
  13. I have actually been waiting for a long time for both parties to open up and do what need to be done. I can finally hail OcUK for being reasonable o/
  14. cool3atool: where did you get that sig? you have stolen my IDEA!
  15. o/ red OOC: my favorite color and would have been there had I not had a friend on a different sphere when I started.
  16. no. only the allies you feel like defending. honor indeed
  17. I somewhat agree with iamthey. Every leader does what he thinks is best for his alliance. This is called acting logically. If he doesn't, then he shouldn't be the leader for his alliance. Everything the NPO did that it is hated for, was justified by this unquestionable logic. However, what is questionable is whether or not these actions and policies are actually in their best interest. You could use anything they have done for example, they did it for their best interest, but I would argue that some of the things they did actually ended up hurting them. Alliances that are following NPO in what started out as a dim chance are doing so because they feel it is in their alliance's best interest. Alliances on the Karma side are doing it for the same reason, it is what they feel is the alliance's best interest.
  18. you have to be lenient on sparta since they entered a little late, and I'm sure most of NPO's slots were already full. look at nemesis! I think it would be better at how many nations update blitzed as opposed to # of blitz wars but I know that would have been extremely hard to count, props
  19. o/ our fantastical allies. let hell reign down upon them! /me hands out orange lightsabers
  20. hoo is who? lol, couldn't resist the old puns from long ago. o/
×
×
  • Create New...