BlkAK47_002

[quote name='Lennox' date='23 May 2010 - 01:37 AM' timestamp='1274593021' post='2308858'] Remember when Athens and FoB attacked Knights of Ni! ? [/quote] If you think I was trying sling an insult at NPO pull back on the throttle, because I wasn't. I was just expressing how suprised I was that NPO was concerned about a GOD/Athens threat. Nothing more nothing less. And sure Athens raided another alliance but they aren't dumb enough to pull that with Pacifica. If they do happen to try I will enjoy seeing them get rolled.

[quote name='Haflinger' date='23 May 2010 - 01:29 AM' timestamp='1274592574' post='2308848'] Those alliances do have allies, you know. [/quote] They arent the greastest human beings on the planet but I find it hard it believe that GOD and Athens buddies would join actually join them in an unwarranted attack on NPO.

[quote name='WorldConqueror' date='23 May 2010 - 01:18 AM' timestamp='1274591874' post='2308839'] I'm surprised you don't know, considering one is in your bloc. Athens and GOD IIRC, I believe it was mentioned in a Sir Paul piece a little while ago. Funny I know, but then our nations haven't had 10 months of receiving tech from theirs, or the ability to buy military wonders, putting us at a disadvantage on a nation by nation basis. I know some will counter with 'OMG, look at the difference in number of members'. Yes, we have more members than them, but even 3 nations with little tech against one with a lot and a WRC/MP are going to take a lot of damage. [/quote] Wait you're worried about GOD and Athens?

[quote name='Penkala' date='22 May 2010 - 04:26 PM' timestamp='1274559956' post='2308326'] My problem is with the whining over a half dozen threads and over 200 pages of posts. It's ridiculous. If you're going to take a 'wait them out' approach, quit complaining about how long it's taking. If it's taking too long, then gather some outsiders and attack them. If neither of these are acceptable, surrender. It's really that simple. But whining when YOU took the strategy of continuing the war for months is annoying. And yes, you are whining. And you are complaining. No, that's not true. What I've stated (several times!) is that [b][u]if you're going to choose to wait Gremlins out, quit complaining about how long it is taking and how long Gremlins is keeping you at war.[/u][/b] I also pointed out their other options to end this more quickly. Please don't twist my words because you can't defeat my argument. No, you don't, really. They haven't done any more damage to you since the war ended. So you have no claim to compensation. Hell they aren't even asking it of you, and you caused this war. Go ahead and try and get reps from Gremlins, though. I doubt they'll accept them, and then YOU'LL be the one holding THEM in perpetual war. Plus, SG *may* have a problem with you taking reps from this war, especially if you'll use them to pay what you owe to SG (yes, what YOU owe, out-of-pocket. Not what Gremlins has to pay for you). Not saying they will have a problem with it, but they might. And frankly, asking for punitive damages from Gremlins is really pushing your luck. You know you're right when your detractors have to twist your words. I'll say it slow for you Woody: You... Can... Use... This... Strategy... Just... Don't... Whine... About... It... Taking... So... Long... When... You... Have... Half... A... Dozen... Ways... To... Speed... It... Up... Now debate my statement or don't bother responding. Redefining my position on this issue is not a debate tactic, Woody. Either confront the statement or don't. Once again, pushing it. If I were SG I wouldn't allow IRON/DAWN to demand reps, especially when they're taking virtually no damage. [/quote] You do realize that neither IRON or DAWN started these threads about Gramlins? The only time I've seen IRON/DAWN members post is when their honor or integrity is challenged by people like you who spew petty insults. And most of them are intended to provoke them into making a suicidal charge at Gramlins upper tiers. They haven't asked for help. I didn't know thatdefending yourself = whining

[quote name='lonewolfe2015' date='21 May 2010 - 06:50 PM' timestamp='1274482191' post='2307362'] I'm not looking to start a conflict or drawn lines or roll out the 'he haz a war reason' humor that is going around, but I would like to know if for the record, this [i]could[/i] be considered a breach of terms, discussing a treaty when I believe(?) treaties were forbidden by the terms laid out. Just a simple, yes or no would do for me. Thanks. [/quote] The NPO were supposedly allowed to sign treaties under terms

[quote name='KingSrqt' date='21 May 2010 - 12:53 PM' timestamp='1274460774' post='2307025'] Oh I almost forgot ZOMG WERE ALL GUNNA DAI!!!!!!! [/quote] Ah, thats more like it!

[quote name='Ashoka the Great' date='20 May 2010 - 09:52 AM' timestamp='1274363537' post='2305070'] What's frustrating to me is that no matter how many times I say much the same thing, someone always pops up to say, "Oh, you just hate the NPO." The good news, I suppose, is that with their release from terms the New Pacific Order is finally in a position to follow through on what they've promised. Oh, and "o/ Vox" and all that. Good times. [/quote] Oh, you just hate the NPO! Also nice speech Vox, I hope you nad the NPO can bury the past and move on.

<3 O/

Trouble in paradise huh?

[quote name='dy Cazaril' date='09 May 2010 - 12:30 PM' timestamp='1273422604' post='2292536'] Hey, this is what happens when we focus on economic growth rather than blowing ourselves up every couple months. [/quote] Which is why I love GPA, Conflict is fun, but it's alarming how idiotic the reasons are in the first place.

[quote name='Delta1212' date='18 May 2010 - 12:15 PM' timestamp='1274199287' post='2302201'] A whole lot of people. The argument was that after TOP and company discovered they were losing, they offered white peace. This meant that C&G could end the war at any point, so their refusal to do so meant that they were now the aggressors. [/quote] "Alot of people" isn't a very viable source [quote name='Delta1212' date='18 May 2010 - 12:15 PM' timestamp='1274199287' post='2302201'] so their refusal to do so meant that they were now the aggressors. [/quote] That may be you view from the otherside of the fence. There were many nasty things that people called CnG. Some relating to parts of the body. As for people calling them aggressors, perhaps their comments were misinterpreted.

[quote name='Arcturus Jefferson' date='18 May 2010 - 11:36 AM' timestamp='1274196988' post='2302178'] It was. [/quote] By who?

[quote name='sethb' date='18 May 2010 - 10:27 AM' timestamp='1274192826' post='2302149'] Yeah, really. [/quote] Thank you for your input.

[quote name='Chief Savage Man' date='07 May 2010 - 12:41 PM' timestamp='1273250481' post='2290342'] Haflinger stop talking. MK was trying their very hardest to stop the NpO-\m/ war before it could start. Remember that PC was on the other side of that conflict and is a close ally of Athens and FoB. [/quote] lol, really now?

[quote name='TrotskysRevenge' date='18 May 2010 - 01:26 AM' timestamp='1274160372' post='2301973'] This is still going on? It seems the only one prospering from the Gramlins-IRON war is IRON; Gramlins is down to 35 nations. How is that working out for you, guys? [/quote] Shhhhhhhhhh, wait, wait, lets not ruin a good thing

[quote name='Biazt' date='17 May 2010 - 02:14 AM' timestamp='1274076822' post='2301028'] I don't see GOONS featured anywhere in this glorious artwork. I am disappointed [/quote] Hey man, the story's just beginning

[quote name='Barnaby von Farter' date='17 May 2010 - 11:24 PM' timestamp='1274153030' post='2301853'] You admit that you are unaware of the facts, [/quote] Huh? [quote name='Starpluck' date='15 May 2010 - 12:06 PM' timestamp='1273939584' post='2298793'] Guys its all solved, no need to make a big deal about. We ALL (Facepunch Alliance) thanked him for his assistance in mediating some problems. That is all. No need to be an interventionist. [/quote] I guess that pretty much spells it out? [quote name='Barnaby von Farter' date='17 May 2010 - 11:24 PM' timestamp='1274153030' post='2301853'] But you said it as though it was fact, hence continuing the smear campaign on accident. Whoops. [/quote] .......It was a fact I'm not sure you completely thought this through before posting. Your rebuttal makes very little sense.

[quote name='abdur' date='16 May 2010 - 10:29 PM' timestamp='1274063332' post='2300805'] No, earlier in the thread, they said that they appreciated the help Greene gave them. [/quote] If that is the case then this was nobodys buisness to begin with and was completley blown out of proportion. UPN holding FP hostage is complete and utter bull&%@# And if it's true that FP approved of Greene holding their channel then the extra few pages that are, and will be tacked on to this topic proves that a majority of this was a smear campaign (that failed) or people looking for an excuse for war.

Has FacePunch asked for help or complained about this at least?

[quote name='Lord Brendan' date='16 May 2010 - 07:21 PM' timestamp='1274052083' post='2300568'] Bit of revisionism here. Your declaration of war on CSN was almost entirely symbolic, more of a "look at me!" kind of thing than an actual defense of STA. STA may have appreciated the symbolism, but we were only at war with them for a few hours after your declaration anyway. I think you might have launched one war (that or none). Just thought I'd make that clear. [/quote] lol, wow.....Just wow..... Prepare to be dogpiled by logic, facts and common sense!

[quote name='Merrie Melodies' date='16 May 2010 - 07:01 PM' timestamp='1274050870' post='2300525'] Orly, I thought this was a IRON CURTAIN thread, or do your allies take the back set on this bus? [/quote] He said NSO related, not NSO centered. You guys are pretty good at twisting up words, but not good enough.

[quote name='Corinan' date='16 May 2010 - 05:55 PM' timestamp='1274046924' post='2300377'] Yes, and I believe that it's called the "MK Method." Your alliance does have an interesting habit of showing up in topics related to us and hurling insults, after all. [/quote] Ah, so the method has a name.

[quote name='KainIIIC' date='15 May 2010 - 07:10 PM' timestamp='1273965034' post='2299143'] This is an extremely sexy bloc. Comments from Xiphosis and MK make it even better [img]http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/467/nsosmugsmall.png[/img] Here's a toast to our spreading of teh evil! [/quote] It just gets better and better, As the Nay sayers pile up we will drink a toast to the newly formed IRON curtain

[quote name='Krashnaia' date='14 May 2010 - 08:23 AM' timestamp='1273839808' post='2297725'] Yeah. And you keep replying to them. Spotting some psycological issues there. [/quote] Well there's a double standard. I didn't realize that you were type of person to continue debating this subject even though you were proven wrong. Now in some ridiculous attempt to salvage your "CN Credibility" you back pedal and claim that people are insulting you and trying to deny you your Freedom Of Speech rights. But yet I had no idea that proving someone wrong = violating the first amendment The fact that you first came in here, Insulted IRON'S war fighting abilities, Made a false statement and defended it, and then cried foul when people begin to dog pile you with common sense is amusing.

Edited