Jump to content

Owney OSullivan

Members
  • Posts

    392
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Owney OSullivan

  1. colonel mustard, superman and paul at it again. [quote]Number of Soldiers Lost in All Wars. 21,654 Attacking + 12,265 Defending = 33,919 Casualties Casualty Rank: Ranked #58 of 1,161 Nations (5.00%)[/quote] Was hoping to get a some more defending in the last war.
  2. Don't know about the pre-war stats, but as of right now RE has a better ANS, more nukes, and more NS. PS/RD have a small handful more nations though. (Hey, just following the trend of the stat police this round ) However, I think RE will need all the luck they can muster fighting PS, they are vicious on the battlefield! Good luck everyone and have fun!
  3. Hail Odin and the old Gods of the north! Good luck to your alliance.
  4. [quote name='ADude' timestamp='1316028548' post='2800490'] I was there, I also know that it wasn't just Confusion who was throwing things like that around. Also in current TE it is unavoidable for the larger AA's to not fight, like I have said in the thread before I don't care if you are rolling Anon and SUN, but I do find it funny that last round you said no more grudges yet you cite last rounds Anon war against you as a reason for the war. [/quote] What I find funny is that at the beginning of last round, Confusion came to the Anon embassy on our forums to make amends and try to stop the OP/Anon feud or some such nonsense, and then Anon attacked us and a handful of DF nations later that round. If people didn't want grudges to be held, then they shouldn't spit that BS and attack us. But if what you said here is true, perhaps there was some deception on both sides. What goes around comes around, I guess. Personally, I'm thankful for it because I happen to fall into the "God forgives, OP does not" camp within my alliance.
  5. To Stevie, when I refer to PLOW I'm talking about when G-6/RE/DR/Syn etc did a [i]massive[/i] down-declare on PS, LE, OP and WAPA. (Hence the acronym) It was absolutely ridiculous, someone mentioned the 200 something nuke advantage, need I say more? I believe it was the round the DR flag was uploaded. Perhaps DR didn't outright declare on any PLOW alliances,(Hard to remember now) but I saw a lot of DR members switch over to G-6 and fight us. Fought someone I know from SE who was in DR and he told me he was instructed to switch to G-6. And to the new guy who quoted me, I wasn't addressing you, I wouldn't expect you to know/remember. And to the sentiment that this war will cause ill will between Anon and OP, all I have to say is the seeds were already planted by G-6 + puppets rounds ago, and again last round with the DF fluff war conducted by Anon. Just my perspective on the matter. And Con, at first glance it didn't seem that a 1 v. 1 this war would be a relatively [b]fair[/b] war IMO given your amount of nations, NS advantage, and nuke advantage. (Many of which were protected by silos.) But given your counter, err I mean lack there-of, I think we still could have taken you. Hey, it's a long round, maybe we'll get the chance yet!
  6. Haha at all the whining, keep it coming guys! Hey, remember that PLOW thing? And last round when you blitzed OP and DF? You focused 99% of your attention on OP on blitz night to try to ensure a clear victory, which you did not receive. Both our alliances went down, hard, while DF barely countered and lost what, 50-60k NS total? DF was fluff added for stats, and you know it. Anon has nothing to complain about here. This war is more fair since we're actually ATTACKING SUN. And I literally laughed out loud when confused said OP couldn't take Anon 1 v. 1. If it was a relatively even statistical war, even if you guys blitzed us, we would mop the floor with you. Again let me reference last round, DF was barely touched by you guys so you had a huge advantage against us, your real targets, and we still dropped you guys pretty heavily. Maybe we lost more total NS, but you lost a huge amount too and you were essentially just hitting us. Again, OP vs. Anon in a [b]fair[/b] fight 1 v. 1, is no contest. OP goes home with the shiny championship belt. It's true and you know it, Con, don't be jealous. Edit: Typo. And don't take my post as an insult guys, I have a degree of respect for some Anon members, just telling it like it is.
  7. Wow, I was expecting some sort of counter at update.
  8. [quote name='Confusion' timestamp='1315853063' post='2799293'] It's nice to see LE hit us after we turn down an offer from OP to hit them. Other than that, best of luck. Somethings never change, Carpe Diem? Confusion. [/quote] OP approached Anon about a joint dec on LE? If not, please elaborate exactly what you're talking about(was there another alliance in the mix?) Unlikely that we'd even want to work with you guys, plus that'd be about 90 nations against LE's 28. Yeahhh...we don't do huge down-declares. I have a feeling this is nothing but a slanderous lie. And on top of that, most members of the OP grand assembly have a lot of respect for LE, and had another alliance in mind that they wanted to hit. (You) Gov was kind enough to give the people what they wanted. Good luck!
  9. Let's kick down doors and wreck up some stuff, LE! You all have had my respect for some time now since our little feud rounds back. o7 Tick.
  10. [quote name='MCRABT' timestamp='1314351089' post='2788690'] There was time when FEAR government advised us not to provide one your dead end alliances protection and it was foolish of us not to follow that advice. It saddens me that they have allowed you a place in government. As you can probably see from our members reaction in this thread FEAR is fairly well liked in IRON. I might add that the Deputy Secretary of State you are in daily contact with has been in the job for a little over a week, in the year prior the relationship between IRON and FEAR has been that of cordiality in the passing. We don't need a ToA to maintain that type of relationship just a degree of decorum which I am sure I can maintain with your alliance despite your individual obnoxiousness. [/quote] Slam dunk. /thread
  11. Good luck fear, I'll always like you guys even if we're no longer treaty partners. o/
  12. Make that 6...heh. Dunno why he bothered trying, the game will reset before I can nuke him anyway.
  13. [quote name='Lurunin' timestamp='1313541067' post='2782498'] you do realize The Last Remnants were formed AFTER The Last Republic right anyways necessary times call for necessary decisions and all that jazz [/quote] I think since The Last Remnants is a much more relevant alliance, they deserve the capital "T".
  14. [quote name='Axolotlia' timestamp='1313211443' post='2779176'] Oh OP... I love you guys. To: Toad1 From: Unknown Sender Date: 8/12/2011 11:53:41 PM Subject: Spy Operation Attack Message: A spy operation has been launched against your nation. In the attack the enemy spies targeted your nuclear missiles but were unable to locate any due to your hidden nuclear missile silos. Your attacker was able to return home unharmed and unidentified. [/quote] Yeah, I've gotten 4 of those so far. Hilarious.
  15. [quote name='Frostfirefox' timestamp='1312684505' post='2773942'] I do this intentionally :3 only pros spy nukes against all odds [/quote] Haha, you'd be totally boss if the game glitched and you succeeded. Fun war so far guys, cheers to my opponents. Also seems to be pretty even damage wise.
  16. [quote name='Wabooz' timestamp='1312617699' post='2773429'] Perhaps you are underestimating DF. If they were struck less in the initial blitz, then that's all the more nations of theirs to counter with. DF is not an afterthought alliance. If we wanted to go that route we would've hit SUN along with OP. [/quote] Perhaps, but given their ANS vs. yours, I'm not sure how much of an impact they can make. But we will see. In my personal experience they are tough and persistent, but the stats aren't in their favor, so I don't know how far that will take them. And as Confusion already said, Anon focused on the top tier. So what's left, DF lil guys? Haha got another spy attack against my n00ks, you guys gotta start checking for the HNMS. 2 wasted spy ops on me for today. Anyhow looking forward to you gents reducing my bills, they were getting pesky.
  17. Oh, I guess I must be in OP's top tier then at my peak of 8k+ when we have 20k NS+ nations. Anyway, not !@#$%*ing, just pointing out that the vast majority of wars were declared on OP nations. But you may be right, I didn't check individual nation strengths of the nations you declared on, but I see DF's ANS is about 6k(half of yours), so therefore there would be less wars against them if you were "concentrating on the upper tiers". I was just commenting on something I noticed, sorry if you perceived it as !@#$%*ing. I'm looking forward to fighting just as much as anyone else. Also lawl: [quote]To: Owney From: Unknown Sender Date: 8/6/2011 12:12:25 AM Subject: Spy Operation Attack Message: A spy operation has been launched against your nation. In the attack the enemy spies targeted your nuclear missiles but were unable to locate any due to your hidden nuclear missile silos. Your attacker was able to return home unharmed and unidentified. [/quote] I always love to see that.
  18. I see you guys concentrated much more heavily on blitzing OP nations. Smart move. DF is just added into your DoW as fluff and to make it appear more "fair" IMO. I hope others see right through your tactics too. Anyway, LET'S DO THIS!
  19. o/Umbrella, an alliance I've respected for a long time. Happy to see this treaty.
  20. Nice match up, have fun gents! o7 TPC
  21. You're taking my post out of context and putting words in my mouth, and accusing me of spinning things?
  22. Well, we didn't get to round-long war you last time, I just wish we could this time. And there was at least one other RE member who complained about us "not fighting until day 30", go read the thread. And yes, we already fought a war and that is a fact. Also if you're so happy with RE's performance in the war, why ask for peace now? Is it because you know you'll be obliterated?
  23. It's unfortunate we accepted their request, after all that moaning in the other thread. They complained about us "not fighting until day 30", so why don't we just round-long war them and show 'em just how much we like to fight. Keep pounding them IMO. Oh well, looking forward to you asking for peace again next time RE. It's been real.
×
×
  • Create New...