LB-log

Too light, default (no option for suspended) and 6 months (hence the default- not because I don't trust TOP to honour the repayment).

I'm all for Peace - Violance is Bad

I was on the CnG side. My alliance didn't seek reps, so I don't really care about their size or how long they'll take to pay off. (Therefore, null vote.)

I do like the "WUT will never fall apart" option, though. Brings back memories.

I feel the terms were too light for some, and too much for others, but then again I'm biased by being treatied to IRON, so I may be a bit biased.

Also, I'd like to see BOB going to war in 6 month cycles like the days of old. The time between Wotc and Karma was too long.

Also, I'd like to see BOB going to war in 6 month cycles like the days of old. The time between Wotc and Karma was too long.

But how will we rebuild our precious infras?

The core reps (TOP/IRON) are too harsh for me. I guess I was on C&G's side nominally? heh.

I'm fairly sure there's enough people agitating around NPO coming out of terms that they're going to get attacked at some point in three or four months and that will start a big war.

Where's the "This war got annoying a long time ago and I'm glad we put it out of its misery" option?

Where's the "This war got annoying a long time ago and I'm glad we put it out of its misery" option?

You're just angry about doing all the stats? Which reminds me, when do we get a pre and post war update ?

I find it funny that NpO is listed as "Neutral" in a war that wouldn't have happened without them declaring war in the first place.

I find it funny that NpO is listed as "Neutral" in a war that wouldn't have happened without them declaring war in the first place.

Well that was obviously cancelled out by their defense of MK shortly after the start of the war. XD

Neutral, too light (mostly), 15 rounds (5 months), 8 months.

Neutral, too light (mostly), 15 rounds (5 months), 8 months.

Neutral? Stop pretending.

I find it funny that NpO is listed as "Neutral" in a war that wouldn't have happened without them declaring war in the first place.

It's not that Polar was neutral, it's that they cannot claim to have been on C&G's side or on TOP's side.

WAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!! LB make me a sammich.

It's not that Polar was neutral, it's that they cannot claim to have been on C&G's side or on TOP's side.

Polar never claimed a side... We were just ''bringing it'' at the invitation of others...who seemed upset that we responded so positively to their invitation... then we honoured a treaty with two alliances, one of whom we cancelled on in the process. Seems fairly neutral to me

Also hello

Didn't NSO cancel on you?

Didn't NSO cancel on you?

NSO are not included in the above reference (try GR and MK...)