Gibsonator21 Posted January 24, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 24, 2011 Yeah. We need more small nations. Our upper's are wrecking you guys, but the lower tier we can't find anyone small enough lol. Check top 100 of every AA and we'll see different results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xerxes II Posted January 24, 2011 Report Share Posted January 24, 2011 [quote name='HeRo1' timestamp='1295899920' post='2596992'] Just for some more follow up stats: LoSS: 79 of 299 in anarchy Hydra: 54 of 79 in anarchy Legacy: 22 of 99 in anarchy The Brain: 6 of 39 in anarchy CSN: 47 of 154 in anarchy By Percentage: 1st: Hydra 2nd: CSN 3rd: LoSS 4th: Legacy 5th: The Brain EDIT: All the forces against LoSS combined is 371 nations. Out of that 129 is in anarchy. Your combined forces have more in anarchy by percent than us. [/quote] Ah...so this is what you spend your time doing while in anarchy. So by your calculations, 220 LoSS nations beat you at avoiding anarchy and are clearly superior fighters Misleading stats FTW! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeRo1 Posted January 24, 2011 Report Share Posted January 24, 2011 (edited) Or we could count every member as a member and go from there. 4 on 1 and we are still doing better. Just stating the facts, if you don't like them then surrender. Edited January 24, 2011 by HeRo1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonator21 Posted January 24, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 24, 2011 (edited) [quote name='HeRo1' timestamp='1295903106' post='2597075'] Or we could count every member as a member and go from there. 5 on 1 and we are still doing better. Just stating the facts, if you don't like them then surrender. [/quote] Hah, I didn't say the stats were wrong. I'm not too concerned with your 96 nations 2k and under though, to be honest. Edited January 24, 2011 by Gibsonator21 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeRo1 Posted January 24, 2011 Report Share Posted January 24, 2011 YOU might not, but your bankers might. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonator21 Posted January 24, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 24, 2011 Nope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted January 24, 2011 Report Share Posted January 24, 2011 [quote name='HeRo1' timestamp='1295903789' post='2597091'] YOU might not, but your bankers might. [/quote] Bankers? They still exist? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpacingOutMan Posted January 24, 2011 Report Share Posted January 24, 2011 [quote name='HeRo1' timestamp='1295899920' post='2596992'] Pointless Stats [/quote] Posting anarchy stats is about as useful as, well, something useless. Anarchy stats are only really relevant during a blitz, that's it. It seems that you have forgotten that, ya know, nukes are an auto-anarchy... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeRo1 Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='SpacingOutMan' timestamp='1295904636' post='2597115'] Posting anarchy stats is about as useful as, well, something useless. Anarchy stats are only really relevant during a blitz, that's it. It seems that you have forgotten that, ya know, nukes are an auto-anarchy... [/quote] And you all outnumber our nuclear nations by quite a bit. By what you say, shouldn't you have more of us in anarchy then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonator21 Posted January 25, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 (edited) [quote name='HeRo1' timestamp='1295929702' post='2598234'] And you all outnumber our nuclear nations by quite a bit. By what you say, shouldn't you have more of us in anarchy then? [/quote] What? All your big nations are in anarchy. Just because we have more nations with nukes doesn't mean we can hit every nation. With those 96 nations (or whatever it was) under 2k, we don't really have nuclear capable that can hit them. If we did they'd be as screwed as your upper tier is. Edited January 25, 2011 by Gibsonator21 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeRo1 Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='Gibsonator21' timestamp='1295930205' post='2598298'] What? All your big nations are in anarchy. Just because we have more nations with nukes doesn't mean we can hit every nation. With those 96 nations (or whatever it was) under 2k, we don't really have nuclear capable that can hit them. If we did they'd be as screwed as your upper tier is. [/quote] You said exactly what i wanted to hear. Thank you for proving to me that CSN is (imo) a !@#$ alliance. Your nukes are your only strategies in war? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonator21 Posted January 25, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 (edited) [quote name='HeRo1' timestamp='1295930733' post='2598364'] You said exactly what i wanted to hear. Thank you for proving to me that CSN is (imo) a !@#$ alliance. Your nukes are your only strategies in war? [/quote] You brought up about how we have more nuke nations. We have all your large nations in anarchy. I believe it was 44 after our opening blitz, which had no nukes. So there goes that accusation. Also, we have hardly a comparable number of nations under 2k (19 to your 96). So how are we supposed to cover them all? Edit: It didn't get my point across the first time. Edited January 25, 2011 by Gibsonator21 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liz Girard Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='HeRo1' timestamp='1295930733' post='2598364'] You said exactly what i wanted to hear. Thank you for proving to me that CSN is (imo) a !@#$ alliance. Your nukes are your only strategies in war? [/quote] Hero, you of all people I expected to keep it a little classy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOwens06 Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='HeRo1' timestamp='1295930733' post='2598364'] You said exactly what i wanted to hear. Thank you for proving to me that CSN is (imo) a !@#$ alliance. Your nukes are your only strategies in war? [/quote] My strategy is winning [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/smug.gif[/img] Also second nukes are only one factor in this war... The other is we have war chests. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeRo1 Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='Liz Girard' timestamp='1295931166' post='2598423'] Hero, you of all people I expected to keep it a little classy [/quote] sorry to disappoint you liz, classiness was set to the side when your DoW reason was because its a "coalition" war, but i have to ask, how do you actually know me? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fronz Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 Honestly, I'd be really surprised if LoSS had more anarchies percent wise then us. Think about it, If each LoSS Nuclear capable nation is attacked by 3 other nations, then we should have at least x3 more anarchies then LoSS by percent because each LoSS nation can anarchy 3 CSN/Hydra/Legacy/Brain nations, where as we can only anarchy 1 LoSS nation. Mathematics Anyway, enough with this stats crap, didn't you guys hear about apocalypse? The end of days is nigh! /me kneels and prays to admin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rtellez06 Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='Fronz' timestamp='1295932046' post='2598548'] Honestly, I'd be really surprised if LoSS had more anarchies percent wise then us. Think about it, If each LoSS Nuclear capable nation is attacked by 3 other nations, then we should have at least x3 more anarchies then LoSS by percent because each LoSS nation can anarchy 3 CSN/Hydra/Legacy/Brain nations, where as we can only anarchy 1 LoSS nation. Mathematics Anyway, enough with this stats crap, didn't you guys hear about apocalypse? The end of days is nigh! /me kneels and prays to admin. [/quote] This makes no sense. If 3 Hydra/CSN/Legacy/Brain (4 alliances) hit 1 LoSS nation, then you guys suck. But in reality, you guys have 3 hitting 3. Your math is fail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonator21 Posted January 25, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='rtellez06' timestamp='1295933242' post='2598752'] This makes no sense. If 3 Hydra/CSN/Legacy/Brain (4 alliances) hit 1 LoSS nation, then you guys suck. But in reality, you guys have 3 hitting 3. Your math is fail. [/quote] We suck for being able to put three nations on one? Gosh darnit. That last part says we have three guys hitting three guys, so one on one now? Well that's not right if you look at our war screen. Huh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rtellez06 Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='Gibsonator21' timestamp='1295933603' post='2598811'] We suck for being able to put three nations on one? Gosh darnit. That last part says we have three guys hitting three guys, so one on one now? Well that's not right if you look at our war screen. Huh. [/quote] Dunno if you read what I said right, but I said "if you guys had 3 on 1", then I stated, "but in reality you DON'T." As in I'm pointing out its 1 on 1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonator21 Posted January 25, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='rtellez06' timestamp='1295933847' post='2598861'] Dunno if you read what I said right, but I said "if you guys had 3 on 1", then I stated, "but in reality you DON'T." As in I'm pointing out its 1 on 1. [/quote] Yeah, that's what I got. And I pointed out you're wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rtellez06 Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='Gibsonator21' timestamp='1295934042' post='2598892'] Yeah, that's what I got. And I pointed out you're wrong. [/quote] So your saying every LoSS nation has 3 nations on them, as in each of your nations is only attacking one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonator21 Posted January 25, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='rtellez06' timestamp='1295934521' post='2598959'] So your saying every LoSS nation has 3 nations on them, as in each of your nations is only attacking one? [/quote] Nope. I'm saying we have very few one on one's going. The goal is to get three on one where possible, but considering their lower tiers vs. ours, it's quite difficult. At the upper tier's you would be hard-pressed to find many nations in one (or no) defensive wars. The one's that I have found won't be able to say that much longer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fronz Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 (edited) [quote name='rtellez06' timestamp='1295934521' post='2598959'] So your saying every LoSS nation has 3 nations on them, as in each of your nations is only attacking one? [/quote] Actually in reality the average is more 1.5v3.5 in LoSS's nuclear capable ranks most of the declared wars on Hydra, then CSN/Legacy/The Brain declared and filled their slots, then a few LoSS (nuke capable) countered CSN/Legacy/The Brain. LoSS does not have enough members to make this a 1v1 fight against us 4 alliances in the Nuclear capable ranks. Just by sheer numbers its 299 vs 369. It would be impossible to make it 1v1, unless 70 people in our combine alliances sat out. This is not taking into account those in PM on both sides. Edited January 25, 2011 by Fronz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rtellez06 Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='Fronz' timestamp='1295935230' post='2599028'] Actually in reality the average is more 1.5v3.5 in LoSS's nuclear capable ranks most of the declared wars on Hydra, then CSN/Legacy/The Brain declared and filled their slots, then a few LoSS (nuke capable) countered CSN/Legacy/The Brain. LoSS does not have enough members to make this a 1v1 fight against us 4 alliances in the Nuclear capable ranks. Just by sheer numbers its 299 vs 369. It would be impossible to make it 1v1, unless 70 people in our combine alliances sat out. This is including those in PM on both sides. [/quote] Want another alliance to help? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonator21 Posted January 25, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='rtellez06' timestamp='1295935330' post='2599036'] Want another alliance to help? [/quote] You offering? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.