Urmom Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 The amount of insight in this thread is staggering. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternos Astramora Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Classic CoC bloc. I don't get it. There were no cancellations and tons of wars declared. Cowardice = Waiting for a plan to take effect. I have to admit, I lol'd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Brendan Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 How is that good strategy? By declaring, we open ourselves up to 4 war slots. By not declaring, we only have 3 slots being used. Unless we just ignore alliances that haven't actually declared war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kulomascovia Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 I knew I could draw CoC's strategy out if I played my insults right. I don't beleive that iFOK is part of CC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King DrunkWino Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 I knew I could draw CoC's strategy out if I played my insults right. So "HIDE," is now a strategy? I don't get it. There were no cancellations and tons of wars declared. Cowardice = Waiting for a plan to take effect. Say that post out loud until you get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted January 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 (edited) I'd like to ask why people are comparing CC to CoC. There aren't any mass cancellations or any reluctance to go to war. I don't get it. I don't know what you're talking about. Check my alliance affiliation. Also my in game creation date. Your quality of work has really gone down hill recently. GOONS handlers no longer writing good material for you? Ohhhhh derp! Got me! I changed the world with my keyboard months after the Hidden GOONerie folded, but keep trying. Edited January 2, 2010 by Schattenmann Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kulomascovia Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Coalition of Coincedence is abbreviated CoC. Any decision by CoC to use a name who's acronym was already unfortunately taken and connotated is purely their own mistake. ( I say mistake, but I'm sure somoene thought they were clever by using it and trying to turn it around. fail.) I believe the name is Coincidence Coalition not Coalition of Coincidence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heft Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 (edited) Complaining about the lack of a full scale blitz in this war is like complaining about the lack of guitars at a piano recital. On related note, has anyone gotten around to posting a summary of all the various declarations tonight? edit - nvm, found it Edited January 2, 2010 by Heft Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternos Astramora Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 So "HIDE," is now a strategy?Say that post out loud until you get it. What? How you apparently think waiting for plans to take effect means it's cowardice? I was making fun of that concept. Waiting for plans to take effect isn't cowardice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerald Meanĕ Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Forgot to add that TPF's slots expire tomorrow as well. This is also a bit of a blessing as well. On one hand it gets tpf to not be the focus of a few alliances, on the other it means that instead of potentially having a day or two of six slots of war for certain people you allow for those slots to go away, and they can focus more on defense. Though I will say it is interesting that this is one of the few wars where a side hasn't update blitzed after a dow. It'll be cool to see how that plays out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted January 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 (edited) I believe the name is Coincidence Coalition not Coalition of Coincidence. I believe that you should check the title. Edited January 2, 2010 by Schattenmann Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kulomascovia Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 This is also a bit of a blessing as well. On one hand it gets tpf to not be the focus of a few alliances, on the other it means that instead of potentially having a day or two of six slots of war for certain people you allow for those slots to go away, and they can focus more on defense. Though I will say it is interesting that this is one of the few wars where a side hasn't update blitzed after a dow. It'll be cool to see how that plays out. ^ Yes, I agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kulomascovia Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 I believe that I am correct regardless of trivialities such as what they're calling themselves. *Shrug* Whatever you wish Schattenmann. I just don't think the comparison you're trying to make is fair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King DrunkWino Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 What? How you apparently think waiting for plans to take effect means it's cowardice? I was making fun of that concept. Waiting for plans to take effect isn't cowardice. Who said it was cowardice? One side has a bunch of big nations in hide mode and the other side has a bunch of small nations in hide mode. Hence, the main strategy being shown is hide. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternos Astramora Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Who said it was cowardice? One side has a bunch of big nations in hide mode and the other side has a bunch of small nations in hide mode. Hence, the main strategy being shown is hide. The CoC (Coalition of Cowards) thing. The people saying that are saying it's cowardice. Hiding is a valid strategy. Going OOC, camouflage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King DrunkWino Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 The CoC (Coalition of Cowards) thing. The people saying that are saying it's cowardice.Hiding is a valid strategy. Going OOC, camouflage. Again, I'm thinking in terms of simply saying "CoC," out loud until you hear a word. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcturus Jefferson Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 The CoC (Coalition of Cowards) thing. The people saying that are saying it's cowardice.Hiding is a valid strategy. Going OOC, camouflage. Then don't get your feelings hurt over propaganda in a !@#$@#$ war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kulomascovia Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Then don't get your feelings hurt over propaganda in a !@#$@#$ war. He is arguing that the label is unwarranted. If it is propaganda, it is rather silly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternos Astramora Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Again, I'm thinking in terms of simply saying "CoC," out loud until you hear a word. Oh, that. It wasn't created by me, so I don't really care. Meh. Then don't get your feelings hurt over propaganda in a !@#$@#$ war. Who said my feelings are getting hurt? This seems to be coming out of left field. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerald Meanĕ Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Hiding is a valid strategy. Going OOC, camouflage. True, but that generally involves people not knowing you're hiding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kulomascovia Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 True, but that generally involves people not knowing you're hiding. Indeed. However, they still hold the element of surprise; no one knows when the next wave will come out of PM and hit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fireandthepassion Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 It's hard when they put all their top level nations in peace mode. It shows who the true infra huggers are. Funny weren't people praising NPO for using peace mode not that long ago? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Brendan Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Indeed. However, they still hold the element of surprise; no one knows when the next wave will come out of PM and hit. Has LM told them how to leave peace mode? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted January 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 (edited) Hiding is a valid strategy. Going OOC, camouflage. I know wars bring out a lot of people that are unfamiliar with the forums so I'm just going to point out that: (1) you don't have to use OOC tags in this forum, everything is OOC and (2) a recent moderation discussion on the use of OOC tags concluded with them being deemed unacceptable except in the most extreme cases. The rules are pinned. Edited January 2, 2010 by Schattenmann Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King DrunkWino Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Indeed. However, they still hold the element of surprise; no one knows when the next wave will come out of PM and hit. Hit what exactly? All those other dudes in hide mode? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.