HisK Owns You Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 Well its quiet funny how MHA was against curbstomps, yet you guys completely outnumber RE. Now if MHA went 1 vs 1 with RE and said "just because its war," it wouldn't be a problem, but you guys are warring for a stupid reason. So.... (would finish this but don't want to get in trbl) It's just war... no reason... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Itsuki Koizumi Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 (edited) the irony and hypocrisy of your war reasons eh? Edited October 8, 2009 by Itsuki Koizumi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 It's just war... no reason... then why the need for PU and Fark? why the need to have FB bail out MHA from a 29 man alliance? seriously, war is fun i have nothing against it. but if it was war for wars sake, then MHA should have had the cajones to take on RE by themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerahoam Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 then why the need for PU and Fark? why the need to have FB bail out MHA from a 29 man alliance? seriously, war is fun i have nothing against it. but if it was war for wars sake, then MHA should have had the cajones to take on RE by themselves. Here is a parody for you, France (RE) was up against Russia(MHA), Prussia (Fark), and Austria (PU). France managed to beat them... we are just trying to allow RE to prove themselves that they have a leader who is the equivalence of napoleon . I kid of course no one that good will ever come from RE. Sorry joking again couldn't help myself I mean no offense to them really, but if you still don't understand the reason for the war I am afraid that you can't see something so obvious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Itsuki Koizumi Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 Here is a parody for you, France (RE) was up against Russia(MHA), Prussia (Fark), and Austria (PU). France managed to beat them... we are just trying to allow RE to prove themselves that they have a leader who is the equivalence of napoleon . I kid of course no one that good will ever come from RE. Sorry joking again couldn't help myself I mean no offense to them really, but if you still don't understand the reason for the war I am afraid that you can't see something so obvious. that historically made no sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 Here is a parody for you, France (RE) was up against Russia(MHA), Prussia (Fark), and Austria (PU). France managed to beat them... we are just trying to allow RE to prove themselves that they have a leader who is the equivalence of napoleon . I kid of course no one that good will ever come from RE. Sorry joking again couldn't help myself I mean no offense to them really, but if you still don't understand the reason for the war I am afraid that you can't see something so obvious. wait, i am confused. according to MHA's dow, it was due to actions by Tibs, who was no longer even in RE. Then HisK is going around saying it was war for wars sake. Ya'll need to get on the same page or something.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lysander Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 (edited) Here is a parody for you, France (RE) was up against Russia(MHA), Prussia (Fark), and Austria (PU). France managed to beat them... we are just trying to allow RE to prove themselves that they have a leader who is the equivalence of napoleon . I kid of course no one that good will ever come from RE. Sorry joking again couldn't help myself I mean no offense to them really, but if you still don't understand the reason for the war I am afraid that you can't see something so obvious. Here is a parody for you. In WWI Germany(RE) was up against France(MHA), Russia(FARK), England(PU), and US(FB) Germany was kicking rear even when Russia and England joined in, but then US came in. And all for some stupid thing about some leader assassinating someone and betraying someone else, when Germany wasn't even at fault. well nothing ever came out of MHA good enough to regain the top spot (which RE is still in btw and we are still kicking rear) Edited October 8, 2009 by Lysander Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
partymaster Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 Told you it takes alot to bring us down, and I salute the smaller alliances (under 70) fighting the bigger ones, says alot about many things Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathias Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 THIS IS WHY TREATIES ARE RUINING TE! I for one, blame HisK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabryal Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 Here is a parody for you, France (RE) was up against Russia(MHA), Prussia (Fark), and Austria (PU). France managed to beat them... we are just trying to allow RE to prove themselves that they have a leader who is the equivalence of napoleon . I kid of course no one that good will ever come from RE. Sorry joking again couldn't help myself I mean no offense to them really, but if you still don't understand the reason for the war I am afraid that you can't see something so obvious. I believe he's talking about this. Though I could be wrong, anyone of the Coalitions that Napoleon went up against would count, but I think Frederick the great winning four battles in four months against four superpowers is probably a better example. Essentially the equivalent of Mexico kicking the crap out of The United States, Russia, China, and the entire EU in that sort of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingBilly1 Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 Yes i Blame Hisk too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisK Owns You Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 THIS IS WHY TREATIES ARE RUINING TE!I for one, blame HisK. You do know we have no treaties.... And in the DoW I made I never said anything about Tibs... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elric Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 Yes i Blame Hisk too Is this the Planet Steve equivalent to blaming Random? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingBilly1 Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 yes it is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingBilly1 Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 Is this the Planet Steve equivalent to blaming Random? I also blame u for posting that lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerahoam Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 wait, i am confused. according to MHA's dow, it was due to actions by Tibs, who was no longer even in RE. Then HisK is going around saying it was war for wars sake. Ya'll need to get on the same page or something.... MHA has been outnumbered many times at the end of the round for being in the #1 slot, why is it so difficult to understand that its just returning the favor. Who cares about Tibs this has nothing to do with him. and why would Hisk purposely counter-dict himself he after all did make the DOW. If you see the name Tibs or Tiberius in our DoW show me. I believe he's talking about this. Though I could be wrong, anyone of the Coalitions that Napoleon went up against would count, but I think Frederick the great winning four battles in four months against four superpowers is probably a better example. Essentially the equivalent of Mexico kicking the crap out of The United States, Russia, China, and the entire EU in that sort of time. Thank you Gabryal for having an understanding of history lol, you are right again though basically anyone of the coalitions would work, but the third one was definitely the best example since Russia didn't pull out and Poland was completely gone by that time. Also that would be very interesting to see, Mexico taking on that array of powers. Somehow I doubt they would win, but I am sure I would have said the same thing about napoleon in his time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lysander Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 MHA has been outnumbered many times at the end of the round for being in the #1 slot, why is it so difficult to understand that its just returning the favor. Who cares about Tibs this has nothing to do with him. and why would Hisk purposely counter-dict himself he after all did make the DOW. If you see the name Tibs or Tiberius in our DoW show me.Thank you Gabryal for having an understanding of history lol, you are right again though basically anyone of the coalitions would work, but the third one was definitely the best example since Russia didn't pull out and Poland was completely gone by that time. Also that would be very interesting to see, Mexico taking on that array of powers. Somehow I doubt they would win, but I am sure I would have said the same thing about napoleon in his time. It actually has a lot to do with Tibs as that was the reason for war and TPF not joining us etc etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
partymaster Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 It did make sense historically and Hisk didn't DoW, the other peeps at MHA did (just some clarification though I know Hisk and I enjoy our wars ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rtellez06 Posted October 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 17, 2009 10 days and still going strong! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
partymaster Posted October 17, 2009 Report Share Posted October 17, 2009 I like thought of going to Siberia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisK Owns You Posted October 18, 2009 Report Share Posted October 18, 2009 (edited) nvm... Edited October 18, 2009 by HisK Owns You Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts