Inquisitor Tolkien Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 In any event, I wish I wouldn't be temporarily disposed [ooc]camping in Delaware[/ooc] so I could actually watch the whole thing hit the fan, and/or participate in it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Reccesion Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Yes. SHHHHH keep it a secret Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Portugal Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Just wait Comon man, the OWF doesn't have patience for this, just roll whatever you're planning on doing 3 hours ahead of schedule and get over it D: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Reccesion Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Comon man, the OWF doesn't have patience for this, just roll whatever you're planning on doing 3 hours ahead of schedule and get over it D: Man I wish, but it will be funner for you to watch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivellios Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 ah man... two alliances so dear to our hearts B) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hell Scream Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Who said we are doing anything? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Srqt Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 (edited) touche pooks you are a war monger this i know personally. But really this is a cluster $%&@ one that PC should have avoided IMO. IS is way wrong in this instance and if not now will in the future burn for it. Now sounds good. Does CG have anyone other than The Coalition who is backing them? I'm sure you take your protectorate agreement seriously but you're no match for PWN if they decide to support IS in this. Treaties are not the only thing that matters. I think IS should smarten up and realize that sooner rather than later. Edited August 21, 2009 by KingSrqt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Now sounds good. Indeed it does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King MyLife Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Bad Bad IS...starting trouble for no good cause but lol will get alot of people angry...And for CG i wish you settle this with no hostility but if come you know what you got to do...Good Luck CG... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafael Nadal Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Right now, this is mildly entertaining. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gondor Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 I'm still waiting for all the "Tech Raiding is EVIL!!!!" people to show up. Anyway, I hope IS gets what they've got coming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddog241 Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 I'm still waiting for all the "Tech Raiding is EVIL!!!!" people to show up. tech raiding is evil put that in your sig if your down Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asriel Belacqua Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 (edited) I'm still waiting for all the "Tech Raiding is EVIL!!!!" people to show up. Anyway, I hope IS gets what they've got coming. TECH RAIDING IS EVIL!!1!11!oneoneoneeleventyone1!!11! (Is that good enough for you?) EDIT: Curse you ddog241, you beat me to it! Edited August 21, 2009 by Asriel Belacqua Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternalis Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 (edited) oh xander, you jokester you. But seriously, stuuuuupid Edited August 21, 2009 by Aeternalis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Diorno Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 IS already offered peace, the only reason this is carrying on is because Fran wants reps. I don't see how any alliance jumping in, attacking IS, then demanding reps from them is any different from the original tech raid performed on CG. Fran is immoral. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inquisitor Tolkien Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 I'm still waiting for all the "Tech Raiding is EVIL!!!!" people to show up. Anyway, I hope IS gets what they've got coming. Tech Raiding is EVIL!!!! IS already offered peace, the only reason this is carrying on is because Fran wants reps. I don't see how any alliance jumping in, attacking IS, then demanding reps from them is any different from the original tech raid performed on CG. Fran is immoral. You're immoral. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gondor Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 (edited) IS started it, so CG should finish it. IS only offered peace so they could get away with attacks and get none in return. And don't give me that this was one big tech raid. Since when was a situation when 1 entire alliance attacked another with CMs and Bombers considered a tech raid? EDIT: If seems that as soon as I commented on no Tech raiding is evil people present. They all showed. Never mind that some of them have been posting for pages... Edited August 21, 2009 by Gondor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shakyr Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 IS already offered peace, the only reason this is carrying on is because Fran wants reps. I don't see how any alliance jumping in, attacking IS, then demanding reps from them is any different from the original tech raid performed on CG. Fran is immoral. Jack, it doesn't really matter whether or not some (or all) of the IS nations have offered peace. CG was attacked and they are well within their rights to demand reps and/or take their tech/money/land/etc back. At least Fran was nice enough to warn them and give them the option of backing out now. As for the other bit, it is different in that those alliances would most likely be attacking IS in defence of CG, not just "for the lolz" or whatever the reason was ... does anyone actually know yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Treaties are not the only thing that matters. I think IS should smarten up and realize that sooner rather than later. but if IS smartens up then they won't get rolled. and that would make Doch very sad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 but if IS smartens up then they won't get rolled. and that would make Doch very sad. This represents my feelings as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inquisitor Tolkien Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 We are truly starved for drama llamas, it seems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 We are truly starved for drama llamas, it seems. Duh... OOC; Plus summer's ending... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Diorno Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 (edited) Jack, it doesn't really matter whether or not some (or all) of the IS nations have offered peace. CG was attacked and they are well within their rights to demand reps and/or take their tech/money/land/etc back. At least Fran was nice enough to warn them and give them the option of backing out now. From what I've seen of Francesca, she is a character that whines about morals all day long no matter how illogical they are. The action she is trying to take against IS is no more or less moral then what IS did to her alliance, she should realize this and do the moral thing and accept white peace from IS. To me, if she continues this course of action she is immoral. As for the other bit, it is different in that those alliances would most likely be attacking IS in defence of CG, not just "for the lolz" or whatever the reason was ... does anyone actually know yet? They aren't attacking in defense, CG can have peace if they want it, Fran said in her OP that IS offered her peace, she turned it down and instead she is going to start a war of vengeance in order to obtain money from IS. This, is the same as IS did to CG, attacking for money and tech in their tech raid. Fran is immoral. EDIT: fran is immoral Edited August 21, 2009 by Jack Diorno Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gondor Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 (edited) From what I've seen of Francesca, she is a character that whines about morals all day long no matter how illogical they are. The action she is trying to take against IS is no more or less moral then what IS did to her alliance, she should realize this and do the moral thing and accept white peace from IS. To me, if she continues this course of action she is immoral. They aren't attacking in defense, CG can have peace if they want it, Fran said in her OP that IS offered her peace, she turned it down and instead she is going to start a war of vengeance in order to obtain money from IS. This, is the same as IS did to CG, attacking for money and tech in their tech raid. Fran is immoral. EDIT: fran is immoral So you are saying CG should just admit they are losers and be a good little alliance? Sounds kinda lame. I would obtain money if my alliance was attacked. She is avenging what the IS took. If she did what I just said and say they lost, they lose what they are as an alliance. Edited August 21, 2009 by Gondor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddog241 Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 From what I've seen of Francesca, she is a character that whines about morals all day long no matter how illogical they are. The action she is trying to take against IS is no more or less moral then what IS did to her alliance, she should realize this and do the moral thing and accept white peace from IS. To me, if she continues this course of action she is immoral. They aren't attacking in defense, CG can have peace if they want it, Fran said in her OP that IS offered her peace, she turned it down and instead she is going to start a war of vengeance in order to obtain money from IS. This, is the same as IS did to CG, attacking for money and tech in their tech raid. Fran is immoral. EDIT: fran is immoral i dont see it that way mate, sorry but if you bumrush my alliance ill be damned if i just say oh its ok it was just a tech raid no big deal. id demaned reps for the damages. if that was a no go then id just unload everything i can to inflict as much damage is possible Francesca is not the issue tbh, fact is CG got bumrushed. and CG has every right to demand reps Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.