TehChron Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 If you fail at failing, does that mean you win? Ask Fallen_Fool. I believe the High Court of Wigglage has set a precedent on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 [ooc] The definition of an alliance is different in IC and in OOC? Can you please refer me to the rules that assert this distinction? [/ooc] OOC: I am generally stating that OOC and IC are different, otherwise they would not exist. Their differences are quite universal and do not stop at alliance level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sileath Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 Four incoming ground attacks, four glorious victories. To: Sileath From: Jackthelad Date: 8/10/2009 3:22:32 AMSubject: Battle Report Message: You have been attacked by Jackthelad. You lost 1,290 soldiers and 396 tanks. You killed 3,213 soldiers and 465 tanks. Their forces razed 0.000 miles of your land, stole 0.000 technology, and destroyed 0.000 infrastructure. Their forces looted $0.00 from you and you gained $141,101.33 in your enemy's abandoned equipment. In the end the battle was a Victory. Any existing peace offers that were on the table have been automatically canceled. To: Sileath From: Kiida Date: 8/10/2009 3:22:38 AMSubject: Battle Report Message: You have been attacked by Kiida. You lost 359 soldiers and 159 tanks. You killed 1,255 soldiers and 1,000 tanks. Their forces razed 0.000 miles of your land, stole 0.000 technology, and destroyed 0.000 infrastructure. Their forces looted $0.00 from you and you gained $109,394.94 in your enemy's abandoned equipment. In the end the battle was a Victory. Any existing peace offers that were on the table have been automatically canceled. To: Sileath From: Jackthelad Date: 8/10/2009 3:22:43 AMSubject: Battle Report Message: You have been attacked by Jackthelad. You lost 1,629 soldiers and 3 tanks. You killed 1,177 soldiers and 120 tanks. Their forces razed 0.000 miles of your land, stole 0.000 technology, and destroyed 0.000 infrastructure. Their forces looted $0.00 from you and you gained $20,765.47 in your enemy's abandoned equipment. In the end the battle was a Victory. Any existing peace offers that were on the table have been automatically canceled. To: Sileath From: Kiida Date: 8/10/2009 3:22:54 AMSubject: Battle Report Message: You have been attacked by Kiida. You lost 1,376 soldiers and 42 tanks. You killed 2,946 soldiers and 0 tanks. Their forces razed 0.000 miles of your land, stole 0.000 technology, and destroyed 0.000 infrastructure. Their forces looted $0.00 from you and you gained $147,508.79 in your enemy's abandoned equipment. In the end the battle was a Victory. Any existing peace offers that were on the table have been automatically canceled. I guess you should have thought twice before you declared war on the former squad leader of the Beta Bashers, best !@#$@#$ NPO squad south of Epsilon! o/ Beta Bashers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 Four incoming ground attacks, four glorious victories.I guess you should have thought twice before you declared war on the former squad leader of the Beta Bashers, best !@#$@#$ NPO squad south of Epsilon! o/ Beta Bashers No one really cares what a proven liar and attention whore thinks, Sileath. Face it, you're done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternos Astramora Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 No one really cares what a proven liar and attention whore thinks, Sileath.Face it, you're done. Ironic considering you're supporting RV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sileath Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 No one really cares what a proven liar and attention whore thinks, Sileath.Face it, you're done. I know, I suck right? I break a sled to defend a comrade, then I resign from my alliance so it can achieve peace! Now I'm in 5 wars and kicking everyone's $@!. lolSileath Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kulomascovia Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 OOC: I am generally stating that OOC and IC are different, otherwise they would not exist. Their differences are quite universal and do not stop at alliance level. [ooc] Again, I don't see why the distinction between OOC and IC should apply to alliances. A alliances has a set definition that does not change. You may have your own definition but as long as you are playing CN you're still bound by the rules of the game. So you cannot claim that FAIL is not a legitimate alliance when the rules contradict you. If you believe that I am wrong, then I would like to see where you got your definition. [/ooc] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 Ironic considering you're supporting RV. Rebel Virginia's many things (all of them ) but he's no liar. And besides, considering how you were parroting Sileath's !@#$%^&*, you trying to defend him is also I break a sled to defend a comrade, then I resign from my alliance so it can achieve peace!That analogy doesnt make any sense. Id tell you to act with some dignity, but I wouldnt want to waste [ooc]The bandwidth[/ooc] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 No one really cares what a proven liar and attention whore thinks, Sileath. Wait what - why are you supporting RV then? [ooc] Again, I don't see why the distinction between OOC and IC should apply to alliances. A alliances has a set definition that does not change. You may have your own definition but as long as you are playing CN you're still bound by the rules of the game. So you cannot claim that FAIL is not a legitimate alliance when the rules contradict you. OOC: I am not familiar with any rules which force players to recognise alliances of 1 or 2 players. If such rules exist, I expect that many people have broken them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternos Astramora Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 Rebel Virginia's many things (all of them ) but he's no liar. And besides, considering how you were parroting Sileath's !@#$%^&*, you trying to defend him is also That analogy doesnt make any sense. Id tell you to act with some dignity, but I wouldnt want to waste [ooc]The bandwidth[/ooc] It's mainly because I despise RV and thus all who support him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 Wait what - why are you supporting RV then? Show me one time RV's lied, and maybe then you'll have any business trying that line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sileath Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 Rebel Virginia's many things (all of them ) but he's no liar. And besides, considering how you were parroting Sileath's !@#$%^&*, you trying to defend him is also That analogy doesnt make any sense. Id tell you to act with some dignity, but I wouldnt want to waste [ooc]The bandwidth[/ooc] It's not an analogy. Read an economic guide, then you will know what a sled is, and what it means to break it. (Breaking it was necessary, once cannot leave peace mode without first collecting taxes.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hell Scream Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 Ironic considering you're supporting RV. RV has a Jesus avatar, Sileath doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 It's not an analogy. Read an economic guide, then you will know what a sled is, and what it means to break it. (Breaking it was necessary, once cannot leave peace mode without first collecting taxes.) Why should I bother? You're a proven liar, who'd say anything to make yourself look good so long as no one bothers to look into it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kulomascovia Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 Wait what - why are you supporting RV then?OOC: I am not familiar with any rules which force players to recognise alliances of 1 or 2 players. If such rules exist, I expect that many people have broken them. [ooc] Of course, the rules don't force players to recognize alliances. However, you cannot claim that a certain alliance is not legitimate if that alliance has at least one peron flying the AA... actually you can, but you'd be wrong. Personally, I find the concept of "recognition" to be somewhat absurd since you are denying the existence of an alliance that technically exists. [/ooc]. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 It's mainly because I despise RV and thus all who support him. I dont recall asking a question in that post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spock Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 I'm going to lock a thread today and this one will stay closed. )): Wish you people could keep one on topic and IC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts