Kankou Posted July 29, 2012 Report Share Posted July 29, 2012 I'm sorry that you don't have the eye to distinguish C&Ps from original writing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aiden Ford Posted July 30, 2012 Report Share Posted July 30, 2012 This issue will continue to pop up, and will most likely be voted upon again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kankou Posted July 30, 2012 Report Share Posted July 30, 2012 And given the anti-preplanning crowd's ignoring of war waivers, I would have to say that trying to take down preplanning every month is nothing but deliberate agenda setting. Not something we should be doing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Enema Posted July 30, 2012 Report Share Posted July 30, 2012 It'll die sooner or later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triyun Posted July 30, 2012 Report Share Posted July 30, 2012 Did I miss something? People are talking like it was voted to be upheld, but from everything I can see the majority by one was 'Yes it should be abolished' meaning no more preplans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted July 30, 2012 Report Share Posted July 30, 2012 [quote name='Triyun' timestamp='1343683303' post='3017083'] Did I miss something? People are talking like it was voted to be upheld, but from everything I can see the majority by one was 'Yes it should be abolished' meaning no more preplans. [/quote] I direct you to this post: [quote name='Zoot Zoot' timestamp='1343562985' post='3016648'] 14 votes for aboloshing pre-planning 15 votes for keeping it. Pre-Planning is here to stay. [b]Ruled[/b] [/quote] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kankou Posted July 30, 2012 Report Share Posted July 30, 2012 Note: That was with Subtle's vote being ignored. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoot Zoot Posted July 31, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 At the time of the vote subtle didnt have a nation. So stop bringing it up. Its been a precedent since the re-shuffle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evangeline Anovilis Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 [quote name='Domingo the Honored' timestamp='1343683930' post='3017087'] No. A senseless rule which lost the poll anyway, just apparently outside of time constraints (still in place on a technicality) does not deserve to be spread further. The current pre-planning is so ridiculously controversial and contested anyway there's no way an expansion would be logical. [/quote] For all I see, even the time constraints don't matter by now, so, try harder... But I bet you people won't spare us the same discussion in September, even after two votes that were defeated... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Domingo the Honored Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 [quote name='Evangeline Anovilis' timestamp='1343737680' post='3017256'] For all I see, even the time constraints don't matter by now, so, try harder... But I bet you people won't spare us the same discussion in September, even after two votes that were defeated... [/quote] Hyper-intelligent you taking that out of context of the time it was posted. Do try harder, love. And eventually it will be struck down, like it or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kankou Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 Blah blah blah, really, both sides are gettin immature and using the same arguments without any attempt to actually back up what they're thinking. I can't think of only two~three people who can write out a logical response as any question of their position on this issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triyun Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 [quote name='Kankou' timestamp='1343739068' post='3017258'] Blah blah blah, really, both sides are gettin immature and using the same arguments without any attempt to actually back up what they're thinking. I can't think of only two~three people who can write out a logical response as any question of their position on this issue. [/quote] As immature as declaring you think only 2-3 people have logical opinions on something extraordinarily subjective? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kankou Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 (edited) Logical response, oh great Triyun. Something along the lines of a five paragraph essay on why they feeling about an issue. You happen to be one of that two~three people in my mind. EDIT: 1~2 hours of sleep a day is definitely taking a toll on my brain. Edited July 31, 2012 by Kankou Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triyun Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 Or you know... its a game. People may simply feel that the more restrictions you place on a game the less fun it becomes. The purpose of a game is to have fun so we should seek to have the rules get in the way as little as possible. For many that means minimize preplanning and essay writing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kankou Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 One person's unrestrained fun is another person's misery. The entire premise of "fun" at the expense of someone else is inherently a hypocritical contradictory paradox which only undermines its own logic and thus contributes to the escalating polarization we tend to see in CNRP, and the blurring of IC/OOC lines based on the fact that OOC fun contributes to IC actions which are justified by sophistic logic which in the core is nothing but emptiness. Something like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoot Zoot Posted July 31, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 Ladies, Gentlemen, please just stop and take it to the OOC thread please. This matter has been voted on by the community, and by a narrow margin, a ruling was made based on what the majority of the community wanted. If you feel this is wrong, then create a thread and we can do this whole thing again and go into a circle of pre-planning and no pre-planning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.