Jump to content

Johnny Apocalypse

Members
  • Posts

    3,131
  • Joined

Posts posted by Johnny Apocalypse

  1. [quote name='The MVP' timestamp='1299600289' post='2656735']
    No but acting like the end all be all of a certain issue while being biased should be called into question, wouldn't you agree? Come on you're definitely one of the more sensible folk around here.
    [/quote]

    If the person's bias isn't already common knowledge then it probably is worth pointing out, however instead of simply pointing out his bias you went on to accuse him of adopting his position as a way to impress his "new friends" It is more likely that his bias comes from his dislike of CD rather than his fondness for whoever you think his new friends are.

  2. [quote name='The MVP' timestamp='1299600150' post='2656732']
    If you understood [i]why[/i] Lusitan would make such statements you'd understand the very crux of the matter which is my point. Did I come off as attacking him rather than the statement, probably so. However that does not mean that he's looking at things from a biased perspective whether or not he brokered the terms.
    [/quote]

    You're surprised that someone is being biased?

  3. [quote name='The MVP' timestamp='1299599649' post='2656720']
    If you knew why CD was upset with TFD you'd know he's just doing this to tick them off. And because of what? He was too weak willed to carry out a war in which he severely outnumbered an opponent and got roughed up a little by Fark and MHA?

    Glad to see you defend him though, the whole "you're only against them now because they're no longer on your side" doesn't only apply to us you know. We just discuss about it, you rather whine and threaten disbandment.
    [/quote]

    I don't care why CD was upset with TFD. It's not any of my business and I don't intend on making it my business.

    I'm not defending him, I'm calling you out because you said something stupid. You're attacking the person making the statement rather than the statement itself. Also I don't threaten disbandment but I sure do whine.

  4. [quote name='The MVP' timestamp='1299599377' post='2656710']
    Look at Lusitan posing for his new friends.

    CD didn't like how the last war went, they felt wrong by your allies in AZTEC about surrendering to Sparta as weakly as you did to run away saving your own skins. Now here they are defending NSO, it's not a breach of surrender terms as the terms did allow them to be able to reenter by MHA if I recall correctly. Anyways CD's surrender terms should be interpreted by whom they were forced to surrender to due to the weak will of your alliance in particular to carry out a war and put a nail in Sparta's coffin.

    But hey, who am I? Go pose to your new friends some more, I saw this from a mile away.
    [/quote]

    So because he doesn't agree with you he can't be your friend anymore?

    [img]http://i.somethingawful.com/forumsystem/emoticons/emot-qq.gif[/img]

  5. [quote name='Heft' timestamp='1299501465' post='2655358']
    Nobody ever suggested that.
    [/quote]

    Really...

    [quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1299500549' post='2655345']
    MK didn't post a DoW.
    Conflict then become MK&Co. - NSO

    You created a diffrent conflict by not posting your DoW.
    [/quote]

    ...so can we add you to the list of selective illiterates?

  6. [quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1299500549' post='2655345']
    Let me point out what has already beeb pointed out.

    [i]These parties may defend against an alliance who DoWs [b](or equivalent)[/b] against their treatied allies after these terms are posted.[/i]

    MK didn't post a DoW.
    Conflict then become MK&Co. - NSO

    You created a diffrent conflict by not posting your DoW.

    Although this has already been said, you're just reading what you want to read.
    [/quote]

    Okay, so I can sort of see where their coming from considering the wording of the surrender terms, but to suggest that MK-NSO is a separate front is beyond silly.

  7. [quote name='Lusitan' timestamp='1299499872' post='2655337']
    Ok, then say you want to give them harsh terms because you want to give them harsh terms, not because you think they broke an agreement you refuse to understand.
    [/quote]

    You really are desperate aren't you.

    They violated surrender terms by re-entering the war on the NPO front, something they explicitly agreed to [b]not[/b] do.

  8. [quote name='Willaim Kreiger' timestamp='1299211648' post='2651914']
    Did you happen to consider whether English is even their first language? Good luck with your new Co-Pilot, guys.
    [/quote]

    You mean everyone who thinks it is literally the epitome of humour to post "You guys sure get upset up about this LOL" ad nauseum?

    No I had not considered that their first language wasn't English, could you explain to me why I should have?

  9. [quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1299181109' post='2651363']
    You guys get so upset over miner details :awesome:
    [/quote]

    How old are you guys exactly? Honestly this place feels more and more like a playground with every post, so I will be the first to admit, yes i mad. Your posting is pissing me off because you're killing any chance we had left for intelligent discourse by contributing to the infinite ocean of "U MAD LOL" posts and don't get me started on the "Your tears are delicious" posts(yeah I know, that's mainly us)

    Most of you are better than this; !@#$@#$ act like it.


    Nonetheless, congrats on the government switcheroo GOONS.

  10. [quote name='Jaiar' timestamp='1299124609' post='2650651']
    [b]You have dyslexia?[/b] Because the actual number of our wars is about 383. I counted quickly so I may be off by 3 or 4. So yes, just under 400 wars.
    [/quote]

    That's quite the insult there big guy.

  11. [quote name='Varianz' timestamp='1299123698' post='2650610']
    To be honest, those fighting for NPO can understand why they'd feel betrayed by this.
    [/quote]

    I can't speak for them but perhaps Olympus and NAC were hoping that NPO would actually fight with them, rather than cycle more members out to hide in peace mode leaving their allies to take a beating.

    Considering they were fighting to defend their ally don't you think they might feel a bit betrayed also?

  12. [quote name='Jaiar' timestamp='1299123522' post='2650601']
    What a joke --^

    Surrender is pointless. Paying the enemy is pointless. Does anyone really care at this point?

    You really need peace that badly that you accept terms that include paying the enemy? You should be ashamed.
    [/quote]

    Fighting for you is pointless.

  13. [quote name='memoryproblems' timestamp='1299122116' post='2650563']
    Thats pretty accurate, and that is similar to what I've said for some time, but yet certain individuals in doom house consider to demonize NPO and others for "forced disbandment" when, as you noted, those who disbanded could have always chose other options such as warring indefinitely or paying unreasonable reparations.

    So perhaps Doom House should take that off its talking points and list of things to insult Pacifica over? Just a thought.
    [/quote]

    It's like you jumped off a cliff just to avoid the question.

    You're a very silly man aren't you [img]http://i.somethingawful.com/forumsystem/emoticons/emot-psyduck.gif[/img]

  14. [quote name='memoryproblems' timestamp='1299121694' post='2650540']
    NPO never [u]forced[/u] anybody to disband either, but you still talk about it in such a negative light.
    [/quote]

    I'm sorry, what? You didn't answer my question.

    Why is it forced disbandment if you are the one choosing to disband the alliance? You could always choose to not disband the alliance and to continue to wage war instead.

  15. [quote name='memoryproblems' timestamp='1299121032' post='2650508']
    I've been thinking about reps the past few days, and I'm prepared to make an offer of what Sanitarium [i]might[/i] be prepared to pay at the conclusion of this war, whenever we feel it prudent to conclude our involvement in the war. (Which is not right now, nor do I expect it to be soon.)

    But anyway, my offer is... not a damn cent. [b]I'd rather disband then pay GOONS anything.[/b] There will be your chance to prove that Doom House is a benevolent coalition and that [b]they don't "force alliances to disband"[/b]. I'm counting on you guys to live up to your rhetoric, because you can rest assured that I will live up to mine.
    [/quote]

    Why is it forced disbandment if you're the one choosing to disband?

  16. [quote name='Rebel Virginia' timestamp='1299116003' post='2650257']
    [color="#0000FF"]Ha! I knew it. Alliances are dropping out of your coalition like flies GOONS. It is only a matter of time now before you......oh wait, these guys are on our side? Never mind that then.

    Hopeless Coalition, my brothers. Fret not and fear not. This is a clever ruse, boys. We're getting GOONS confidence up. The moment it has gone to their heads then we strike. We will pull our final and secret card. Then our victory will be assured. I think. I'm pretty sure that's the plan. That is the plan, right? Does anyone know what the plan is?[/color]
    [/quote]

    Leaving peace mode en masse sounds like a good plan. You should implement it right away.


    It's been good fun fighting all you Olympus guys for the past 2 weeks, congratulations on peace and good luck to you.

×
×
  • Create New...