Jump to content

fireguy15207

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,729

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by fireguy15207

  1. fireguy15207
    Dammit, I'm going to have to continue neglecting the Fark embassy to get that deleted.
  2. fireguy15207
    Cable back in gubmint?! Congratulations Also, needs moar Fireguy in this announcement \o\ Eperor Delta1212
  3. fireguy15207
    Hey now, I voted for you Still, lolhio.
  4. fireguy15207
    Fark yeah, Pittsburgh! Congratulations to our newly erected officials, especially that Tums
  5. fireguy15207
    I know Marx and Kev are good people and will do great in my stead. I wish the new IPA luck
  6. fireguy15207
    Ouch NV
  7. fireguy15207
    Any problems like that post-truce, as always, is inform your own government and they should let the respective governments know who then will handle it. Bureaucracy, but it works.
  8. fireguy15207
    I expect IRON to rebound quickly. The sheer amount of members alone means even small growth per member a day is still quite a lot, and I'm expecting a lot of aid to go around. I look forward to see IRON's named bolded again
  9. fireguy15207
    Ebil hegemonists at it again! )):
  10. fireguy15207
    Ah, it just isn't a war until someone in an alliance you fought side by side with wishes death and destruction on your alliance EDIT: Calderone: IPA had about 20 total offensive wars with IRON, most being in the 20K NS area.
  11. fireguy15207
    Good luck on cleaning house. Quite a bit of nations gone, but it's better yo have a small active alliance than a large inactive alliance. Also, congratulations to those recipients of the medals
  12. fireguy15207
    He was referring to the talks about reps we had. Rok wasn't willing to let their smaller allies walk away damaged without some sort of repayment.
  13. fireguy15207
    Fair enough. But that number I gave definitely isn't a horrible number, not like what we've seen in the past.
  14. fireguy15207
    Dude, what the hell are you on about? How is what I said "big words?" I'm just stating what would be a fair rep number. And just because we're sub 1M NS doesn't mean we're of no strategic importance.
  15. fireguy15207
    50 tech and 3M per member or even double that would be a good standard. Definitely would be fair, but it does set up for some bad translations (read: this thread and everyone stating these reps are harsh).
  16. fireguy15207
    At the looks of this thread, I should be blaming Rok for the bad PR As I've stated earlier, it was fun fighting IRON. Got my first nuking, plus two more after that, a taste of MHA's Vogon poetry (my eyes bled), and met a fellow Browncoat. All in all, one of my favorite wars
  17. fireguy15207
    I suppose I support my allies in this confusing time?
  18. fireguy15207
    We have 27 members, not all active, and we were still at war with NATO. We needed to clear up that war first to have slots available.
  19. fireguy15207
    Obviously IPA is one of them
  20. fireguy15207
    I understand that, I'm just saying why they don't deserve white peace (nor many of the other alliances getting white peace).
  21. fireguy15207
    Yes, they deserve white peace for the abuse of power for the last year and a half Anyway, good fight, IRON. You have been great opponents.
  22. fireguy15207
    Nice to see peace for IRON
  23. fireguy15207
    Indeed. Everyone knows that I'm a beacon of truth and justice. In other news, I haven't read the topic (just linked to BnT's post), but I'm sure it was a hard decision for TOP to make.
  24. fireguy15207
    No, for the past week we've been working on a number, and it's not 50K tech and 3B. I've been in these talks, so I'm fairly certain I know what I'm talking about. And yeah, 50K tech and 1B cash, IRON can pay off in about one or two cycles.
  25. fireguy15207
    You need better sources.
×
×
  • Create New...