JustinCox

No worries, comrade!!! I've raided the Imperial Beer Store to increase your ration! Check your aid slots!

Hail the Imperator!!! o/ The suspense is dreadful.

Awesome!!! Glad to see Lestat in the council! From the day I first saw him around our forums, I knew he would find himself in Polar government. Take that as a compliment to your calm, level-headed approach to all problems and discussions. Polaris just keeps on rising! All hail the Emperor, and the Order for which he so adamantly fights for!

When particular members decided to recruit from the New Polar Order to form a splinter alliance, that alliance was mercilously and rightly destroyed by the Emperor. It seems as though the same will not occur in MCXA's current situation; TOP stands as a pretty good deterrent to war. The real question lies with the motivations of both signatory parties of this protectorate treaty: what is the point of such an aggressive action at this point in time, leaving aside the reasons for which The Sweet Oblivion splintered from MCXA? With that out of the way, I must ask, which color sphere is The Sweet Oblivion calling their home?

Lol. OWF is great!

This is teh secks! Hail Nueva Vida! :jihad:

No offense, but you guys aren't putting up much of a fight for it .

Do you agree with me that sushi is delicious? How is it that you have been around for so long? (I remember your nation was huge when I first started playing)

Win topic is win.

Planet Boom

Them's fightin words!

bump for us!

I believe this tactic adds more to the game. If an alliance is tracking nations effectively, that alliance should have no problem distinguishing between enemies, friends and (in Ponsters example) nations whose alliance is not actually at war. Of course, that does not change the sentiment that AA change tactics are seen as dishonorable. It seems fairly reasonable that any alliance would use this tactic. The underlying question is what alliances see as honorable and dishonorable, and the situation an alliance may find itself in.