Unknown Smurf
-
Posts
3,022 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Unknown Smurf
-
-
Uhhhhhhh I thought TRE is at war with us? If that's still happening want to send a diplomat my way?
Or not.
Or is this a DoW on us? -
If you want to attack our members, expect some retaliation. You attacked our defenseless members since you couldn't attack DBDC, so we attacked your defenseless ally like you attacked our defenseless members.
Ehh I'm on your side here but that spin is making schatt look like a straight talker.. let's be honest here they attacked your members who were aiding people that attacked them for shits and giggles.
You attacked them because you curbstomped them so bad that you had no targets left and were bored.
If its gonna be the lulz coalition, be the lulz coalition. Jeez. -
You wont.brb staging a DT coup
You have to have vision to be able to see to lead and well.. I mean you can't see well. Genetics. :P -
Is it really that hard to determine the implied question in my statement, "Does this document supercede DBDC's global declaration?" >_> There is nothing in their wardec that suggests that a surrender to a coalition implies peace with DBDC on an individual basis.
Peace between the two of them was signed in the OP. That will most likely stand unless someone violates the agreement (like legion aids polar or something). -
I'll give my address if anyone wants a beer. Otherwise let's all take a step back
-
Why am I not surprised that the tough guys at III% find the lousiest CB possible in order to hit someone weaker than them? If your lack of war is resulting in miscoloured spheres, perhaps you should be picking on someone in your own league. I'm sure you could come up with some imaginary offence a big boy alliance has committed -- God knows you have been good at that in the past. Perhaps you should also consider that calling in allies on someone a third of your size just makes you even more of a joke.
They didn't call us, I just jumped at the opportunity tbh.
Also somethin about tier coverage -
Let us remember that DBDC has been attacking alliances for over a year and not DT or DT probes. It says a lot about polar that you can't predicts possible consequences for your own actions. It should be a wake up call to those who are allied to you and how they may be a part of those consequences.
And I have to ask, do you really think we have only "gotten away" with it because of "upper tier physics" and that our skill and ability had nothing to do with it? It's not like admin turned my 180K nation into a 400K nation and I suddenly learned how to war. Its not like those physics did all our FA work for us and found us allied to the best alliances on this planet. You should go read our terms of service thread from top to bottom. See how many people thought they really had us by the balls. Pay particular attention to your mates posts in polar. Everything we knew we could do, we did. Nothing happened on accident or because of "physics".
PoTY.
Now that you've got the crown though, you've got to expect some ploy to get it, otherwise we will all be bored or this wouldn't be drama nations.
:popcorn: -
Your reading comprehension is a bit lacking. This just shuts down the AFM/DL front. It doesn't change any of the ongoing declarations on the other fronts.
That it is, I read NPO as NpO for some reason. Doh! -
-
Who is left? NEW/FTW/Kaskus versus TOP/Sparta/MHA?
Thanks guys. -
The tone didn't convey. I wasnt serious in my other post. Roman Empire has raided III% in the past multiple times. The DBDC guy is unrelated afaik.
LOL. You declared on an AA over one of their ghosts attacking you?
This gets better and better.
Edit: As per Cubas post, let's make that ex-DBDC -
Pursuant to our treaty with III%, Kaskus recognizes a state of war with Roman Empire. -
Looks to me like DBDC did fool you twice as he was never a member of Roman Empire, just ghosting the AA.Fool me once shame on me .. ,fool me twice, well guess what !
Edit: this was sarcastic. Anyone who thinks III% didn't do their research is dum. -
I'm changing/adding.
LoSS
Valhalla (lead up to disbandment)
GATO (last year or so)
BFF
GOLD -
You probably think you are clever, don't you?
le sigh
Yeah I do. -
I still think loki is a better poster than rota.
-
I said A prime mover not THE prime mover :|
They were neither. And they aren't exactly a powerhouse of activity these days if we're being completely honest. -
I have no idea who you are.
-
Your side is just whining because you're losing. You were perfectly happy to take part in curbstomps when it was you doing the stomping.
I imagine you mean to say when it was Polar doing the stomping.
That said, when was that? -
Avalanche has been targetted as a result of being allied to Polaris.
This is not random nor war for the sake of war - Polaris and all her supporting allies will pay the price for her actions.
Polaris' crimes aside (for I would argue they've done no more than most, and that they've done has been paid but that is not a topic for here), do you believe in alliance sovereignty, foreign policy aside?
That is to say if an alliance chooses to abstain (because they do not agree with their allies mistakes or otherwise), do they not have the right to in your mind?
Note that avalanche played no role in what you consider to be polarspheres crimes. -
Out of alliances that made it to some sort of relevancy? I'd say:
ONOS
Legacy
FoB
ASC
UED -
When we deal with rogues the main objective is to get rid of them once and for all, not to get revenge. If the GPA held grudges, we would have had much greater grudges to hit people for in many past occasions, don't you think?
Damaging a rogue is not an objective per se, for us, but a mean to deter future attacks. If future attacks can be avoided in another way we may choose that. Mind you: I am not saying that the deal is good, just that considering it doesn't mean to surrender and it doesn't mean that the military option is off the table once and for all, either.
So in exchange for peace he gave you his word he wouldn't do it again? Or DBDC wouldn't? -
From "You're useless cowards" to "Go GPA go!" to "You're a waste of space" in the span of two days, the frustration is strong around these boards.
It's almost as if multiple people post on the OWF. -
I'm still interested 8n the hypothetical.
GAs don't make sense now but after a couple rounds of nukes they do once all those citizens from infrastructure are gone. Hypothetically large nation loses in a drawn out war.
Recognition of Hostilities
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
You think the people saying 'do this,' are being sarcastic or facetious, but they aren't (or shouldn't be). They likely would enjoy this happening, it would be an evolution of warfare that hasn't happened in a long long time.