Jump to content

Keysariyt Hanssen

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    405

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Keysariyt Hanssen

  2. An official apology to maroon (excluding TTK)

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by Keysariyt Hanssen

    34 minutes ago, Noctis Lucis Caelum said:

    ???
     

    Weren't you the one who wanted to convince me NG is almost a non-factor on Maroon & fraction of NoR's strengths? Seemed pretty convincing when their close ally (NoR) argued against it & I see him apologizing repeatedly on OWF to TTK. Clearly he wouldn't be posting threads like this if he could, so seemed you were proven right in regards to the NoR/NG power gap.

     

    Citation-Needed-wikipedia-819731_500_271

     

    Provide logs for all of those points and I'll explain why you're wrong.

  3. An official apology to maroon (excluding TTK)

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    59 minutes ago, Noctis Lucis Caelum said:

    o/ TTK
     

    New Kings of Maroon.

     

    So, first you claim that NG can crush Maroon and rules it however it pleases, then you claim that NoR is trying to take that away from NG and they need to reclaim the colour by getting rid of us, then you claim that NoR is trying to treaty TTK so we can shaft our closest ally that has stood by us through thick and thin, then you claim that an alliance NG just rolled the crap out of is the new ruler of Maroon?

     

    Can you just pick one story and stick to it?

     

    o/ NG & Caustic, love you long time. Except for Nettles, he still owns me sodding child support.

  11. Who will win

    in Open World RP

    Posted · Edited by Keysariyt Hanssen

    At this stage, "enough powerful alliances" does essentially equal an alliance such as NPO. There are very few alliances left that have the political clout and resources required to defend Aevrum well enough to actually push NoR back, nevermind NoR and her allies.

  20. Late but Never Absent

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    You continue to delude yourself as much as you want, but we could’ve imposed far worse terms than we offered you. Your attempt to resolve this was quite literally simply refusing to surrender and repeatedly offering the same thing that we rejected in the first place. Your refusal yet again to point out what is wrong with the terms is enough proof that there is nothing wrong with them; you just refuse to see the facts that confront you. 

     

    Do you honestly think that you are in a position to dictate to us the terms of your own surrender?

  21. Late but Never Absent

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    Our terms are fair, and we chose said terms because we are in a position to do so. The fact that you refuse to even discuss what is wrong with the individual terms means that you’re just grasping at straws. 

     

    There is no spinning. Your alliance screwed you over. You didn’t follow the very clear advice provided to you by our Reichsmarschall in another thread. You involved yourself in the conflict and nuked inactive tech sellers. You rejected the terms you were offered out of hand. You came back and expected us to take our terms off the table because you are pretending that you have nothing to lose. You think you’re acting like you don’t care, but you wouldn’t be coming back here time and time again if you didn’t.

     

    You are entitled to live in whatever fantasy world exists within your mind. The rest of us are here, in reality, trying desperately to get through to you that you are in the wrong here. That will keep happening until you realise it. 

  22. Late but Never Absent

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by Keysariyt Hanssen

    So, because you’re afraid that there will be a resounding show of support in favour of the Nordreich and her allies in their defensive action against your alliance, you won’t ask them. Whether or not it’s because you realise you are in the wrong, or because your ego cannot allow you to comprehend that you are not the perfect underdog that you see yourself as, who knows? Glad we could clear that up

  23. Late but Never Absent

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, Noctis Lucis Caelum said:

    There are huge problems with each of the laundry list of terms they want.

    Please go through them for the kind folks watching in our recognition of hosilities thread. 

     

    While you’re at it, don’t forget to ask everyone here if they think the mounting coalition against you are in the right and you are in the wrong, as I suggested to you, since you clearly can’t gather those facts from the posts themselves. 

  24. Late but Never Absent

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    2 hours ago, CrinkledStraw said:

    AGW shouldn't be on the wiki page for this "conflict."

    They were added as the declaration upon them was a part of this conflict. Details explaining the extent (lack thereof) of their actual involvement will be added later today. 

     

    I think its it’s important that knowledge of that particular front be in the same place so that it can be cited as a good example of both how to handle a conflict like an adult, and how not to.

×
×
  • Create New...