Tevron
-
Posts
755 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Tevron
-
-
1 hour ago, dev0win said:
You see there are several posts in recent history in which "a war against doom is a war against all doom" is suggested. So therefore by acknowledging the DBDC declaration, we acknowledged a state of war with Doom.
ITT: An attack on one is an attack on all is somehow represented as an attack from one is and from all.
-
Party hard Legion, we'll trash the minibar later
-
🦀 Kersch is gone 🦀
Congratulations Lyanna!GATO asset out, CLAWS asset in -
-
18 minutes ago, Master Hakai said:
Declare on me!
No, YOU declare on ME!
I said it first!
Yeah but I just need you to declare on me!
If you declare on me then I will declare on you!
I do declare, that is a declaration, in fact several.
-
2 hours ago, HeroofTime55 said:
I am willing to credit Doom with some autonomy, but I am not willing to do so with Polaris, that is an overly generous assessment. Even when I was there, pushing for an independent thought, the feedback was largely along the lines of "We'd like that but we can't upset NPO." Polar FA policy revolves around hiding behind Mommy Pacifica like a frightened child. Even if they want to dip their toes in the water, at the first sign of anything, they are startled and run directly back to Mommy for safety.
Grub deserves better.So explain Bicycle War?
-
1 hour ago, AL Bundy said:
Ehh.. I've been on both sides of this by having the large navy and the one being blockaded. I always start buying a navy so ya I sink money into that every time.
I don't think nations should be able to dodge it, but I also don't think they need a huge blockade penalty (thinking about newbies - not those lifetime vets that turtle all round) I don't know if there is a cap but looking into that if this is adjusted might not push people away from the game but still will do some damage.
Al
Also seems smart. I think the key is making it not viable to avoid navies.
-
2 hours ago, jerdge said:
ITT war names should be funny and also have content - like BiPolar - Herogasm is ok on the fun part only. Tevron's alternatives aren't very funny.
I'll go with WC that we can wait for a couple rounds and then see.
This is the correct take.
-
45 minutes ago, 603Redneck said:
*Polar does what their puppet master Pacifica tells them to
Fixed it for you^
Polaris has a lot more autonomy than you give them credit. Turns out that for you independent action is defined as whatever NG wants, which is why you're in NoR trying to rally instead of on the mother ship.
-
4 hours ago, Emperor Ice said:
Looks like I'm going to need to pay someone to get smaller. See you in 21 days!
A few rounds and they'll be even smaller. The enemy strategy is brilliant, you've fallen for it.
-
8 minutes ago, Lyanna Mormont said:
Was there a community thread for any war naming before? 🤔
Literally in most every global. Here's the one from the last global.
-
9 minutes ago, DeathAdder said:
It's a sad day when I have to be agreeing with Berbers.
It seems to be the strongest name so far, but the brainstorming for names has only just begun!
-
2 minutes ago, Lyanna Mormont said:
....FTW was your side during Snake Eyes, you were in RFI right?
The war has a name, Herogasm
And FTW is now on your side.... right? So I'm not sure what your point was: that FTW should name multiple wars? I don't really think "who names the war" matters so much as having a decent name anyway. Didn't Stewie name the Bicycle War? I'll have to dig up the peace summit, but I guess we'd have to give Doom Wolves naming rights if we're passing batons between AAs or whatever you're implying.
Personally, I think your AA have a voice, just not the only one. Your support of Herogasm is noted! -
10 minutes ago, Lyanna Mormont said:
"you" meaning "your" side lmao
FTW isn't on my side this war, I think you must be mistaken. As I said, I'd appreciate if you at least focused on trying to come up with a name
But you do you!
-
5 hours ago, Lyanna Mormont said:
You named a war, "Snake Eyes" and the other side called it "Korlath Wars". Community aspect lolololol. @Korlath I don't think you check CN anymore, but the wiki should say "Korlath Wars". RIP.
Codark named the war actually:
The reasoning came about because of Smitty's request for impartiality.
Thanks for the credit, but it was FTW who came up with the name. I did support and push for it though, because it was a good name with a good reason. I'd rather you not make the thread about me though, as it seems like we should focus on finding a decent name to prevent a CN wiki edit war. You're also welcome to just keep voicing support for your choice. That's fine too. Live and let live. -
Rolling for Half Damage
Personae Non-Entry
Web Gets Less Webbier -
The Perception Check War was suggested by @Velocity earlier today. I thought that was alright, but I thought maybe something more Doomy or nato / wolves oriented.
Another idea he pitched was North Atlantic Doom Expedition, but then we're missing the wolves. -
My personal enjoyment of The Boys aside, the placeholder name of the war is a bit ill inspired and lacking in the community aspect of naming wars. Come up with some clever war names people, you can do it!!!
https://cybernations.fandom.com/wiki/Herogasm_War
^ The current wiki page, written by Wiki-warrior Smitty -
7 hours ago, Adel said:
Different games.
TBH, trades are not that hard in TE . I have 3 people that can trade atm.
Blockades, yes, had a few this round but managed to pass them mostly back and with interest.
Send me your TE name and I will try to hook you up.
Whinging about trades whilst not showing your Alliance is not the fastest way to get a trade is it?
I don't think you understand the OP. Levon is an active member of Ordo Paradoxia. He has no issue finding trades. His issue is with harbor abuse to dodge blockades.
-
45 minutes ago, A1ph4 0m3ga said:
Tevron, you know we can’t join this fight. We have an undisclosed treaty with CLAWS.
CLAWSCLAWSCLAWS
Good point. CLAWSCLAWSCLAWS is perhaps threatened by our possible merge with FTW and/or NATO though, which makes it a little awkward 😕 -
6 hours ago, A1ph4 0m3ga said:
o/ those who sign treaties that matter!
o/ those who fight and not hoardThanks for the hail, that's good sportsmanship. Right back at you guys and expect to see you all joining us soon enough!
-
1 minute ago, Gh0s7 said:
Lol, do you want to do a count in the number of individual nations you guys sent? 25 FTW, with 11 before update. Out of 155
Nato 9, with 6 before update. Put of 51
And this was with their year of planning. We've had 24 hours!
though really we've had eleven years... -
Honestly I think this is a necessary solution. The competitive aspect of TE is weakened significantly if navy is rendered useless.
-
Excellent news. The flag is too small though.
But you do you!
CN:TE Round 61, Supplemental Resources, and the Absence of a Navy
in Tournament Edition Suggestions
Posted
Clearly not. You're not even referring to the suggestion from Levon.