Jump to content

Frostfirefox

Members
  • Posts

    468
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Frostfirefox

  1. [quote name='bcortell' timestamp='1304217375' post='2702877'] Then why did you declare three wars on them in the last few rounds? [/quote] The first war was a simple matter war and everyone got their panties in a knot and came running to jump in versus our side. Now the second war was a matter of war and crippling their growth (not to mention testing new toys) The third because they harbor ill-will versus us (among other alliances). So it is more practical to defend the nations we needed defended in an offensive rather than defensive. Now we let them take there ill-will shot and move on. Do the damage we can and take all the nukes they have for us. Then we rebuild and have a fun round like always
  2. [quote name='Schad' timestamp='1304155223' post='2702451'] Last round, one of your members pointed out over and over and over again that if PS, LE and OP were annoyed with the way things went, it was our fault for not hitting you first. Why is it a shock when that message was taken to heart? [/quote] Glad to know we are feared at least
  3. [quote name='Wabooz' timestamp='1304146824' post='2702410'] I'm sure, it's already !@#$@#$ old fighting the same people for what? three months now? [/quote] I agree. :3 I wanted to fight other peoples :3
  4. Get out of our warp pipes
  5. And people say G-6 carries grudges...
  6. [quote name='dealmaster13' timestamp='1303628207' post='2698326'] No, not "we"; you yourself shouldn't be overly amazed by G-6's accomplishments as if it(/they) were something unprecidented. Doch was a guy that was quick to defend G-6 using whatever reason he could conjure up - you just somewhat remind me of him, that's all. [/quote] Why are you taking it so hard? It's not unprecedented. A flag is won every round. It was just a well planned one. The celebrations... shall continue.
  7. [quote name='dealmaster13' timestamp='1303599753' post='2698037'] Don't get me worng - Rudolf did a great job as obviously he was the one that managed to pull through the rest, just a shame the others didn't keep up. I rather like how sacred the flag seems to be in this game (good entertainment), however sometimes in my view, a few people just cross the line with their efforts - not my problem so long as I'm not involved; although that wasn't the case last round. All in all, if you could tone down the unnecessary omfgg6istehbest on the forums, that would be much appreciated. We don't need another Doch here. [/quote] Haha I don't even know why you are concerned with what we do on the forums. Your saying we shouldn't be proud and our guys shouldn't celebrate. I'll pass kind sir :3 And it's not all about G-6 :3 the victory goes to everyone who helped out, I'm just saying Confusion did an excellent job spearheading such a massive movement From your reaction to our celebrations though, I assume you are taking it the wrong way. What better place to celebrate the victory of hundreds of nations then on a public forum those hundreds of nations visit
  8. [quote name='dealmaster13' timestamp='1303588954' post='2697926'] Yes, one G-6 member ended up with more NS than a non G-6. I'm not sure why you're proud about that. [/quote] 1 is all it takes buddy. It could be more but everyone was placing rogues at the end. You guys complain about rogues while we challenge them and brush them off.
  9. [quote name='dealmaster13' timestamp='1303549410' post='2697601'] You're missing the point, that while it was a successful 'flag run' for you, you had it relatively easy by being in wars where your larger nations aren't affected. I'm not sure you can really comment if you weren't one of the guys in G-6 'flag-running'. While we're at it, there are also other ways of acheiving first place other than utilising as many rogues as 'flag-runners' and damaging your own alliance's reputation. I can't stress how much of a loss it would have been for G-6 had a regular outsider won. [/quote] Most people who flag run utilize rogues >.> If you want flag running to be a happy no war zone you will have to wait for G-6 and most other nations to stop playing. And besides you sneaking into 2nd place, G-6 obtained 1st, 3rd and 4th.
  10. [quote name='Thomasj_tx' timestamp='1303530673' post='2697373'] How so? And you may want to wipe your nose off. Just saying. [/quote] In all my rounds, it was the most awesome flag run. Massive in scale leaving ruin to much. But organized enough to leave much room for victory to be achieved versus the masses. If I've learned anything it is, for people who claim to love war you are sure picky about it. [size="1"]You don't know it but Confusion is secretly pulling your strings as well.[/size]
  11. Confusion schooled TE. 'nuff said.
  12. [center]Like a G-6? [img]http://i56.tinypic.com/289jzht.jpg[/img][/center]
  13. [quote name='memoryproblems' timestamp='1303368326' post='2695381'] Several rounds ago, you would have been right. But as time has gone on, certain alliances that would unquestionably be considered "successful" have engaged and promoted these sorts of activity. The days of such actions being a "rarity" are long gone and the game has degraded to a sixty day soap opera where we ask where the next twist may come from. Is it an improvement? If its better or worse is not for me to say, but I don't believe its better. Whatever other alliance's stances, the Warriors will face wars as we always have, doing nothing to give us an advantage in war other than as good of a blitz as we can muster and fighting as well as we know how. [/quote] To be fair it's 50/50, if not more against the pro-tactician alliances. A few rounds ago, these certain people literally were the minority, only sprouting a very low amount of support. Think of it as political parties. Distribution fluctuates, especially as certain parties weaken or strengthen drastically. :3 Leadership in alliances change and events happen that cause their own alignment to shift a few notches to one side. You'd be amazed to find many alliances are not extremists to a single idea and a single alliance with a brief change in leadership can do a complete 180. Thus worrying over conventional and unconventional sides is useless. It's all relative really.
  14. [quote name='Thomasj_tx' timestamp='1303361111' post='2695278'] Nope, he was correct. [/quote] You guys are confusing :3 last time I checked not doing those things were conventional to TE :3 and now you say they are unconventional
  15. I think you got it backwards. Not flag running, not ghosting or rogueing and not hiding nations are all things conventional alliances do :3
  16. [quote name='Jinnai' timestamp='1302839148' post='2690943'] Maybe it'll be an excuse for some to go outside and see what the outside looks like. [/quote] Don't joke like that
  17. do you guys have a public irc channel? :3 that i may join as long as kulomascovia doesn't violate me...
  18. [quote name='seanvdb' timestamp='1302818696' post='2690785'] Don't be mad, what goes around comes around. Except, you know, we did it 6 days before the round ends, not 20 days before it ends, allowing us to rebuild and hit your top 6 nations. Because we're smart like that. [/quote] I'm not mad It's just a wasted effort
  19. More of our fan club Also this is just rogues. Attempting to crumble the G-6 empire like the last 20.
  20. [quote name='King Ernie' timestamp='1302633471' post='2689574'] Everything that shines, ain't always gonna be gold. [/quote] We never asked for praise or acceptance. We pursue our own interests regardless of others feelings. Some will hate us regardless of anything we do. They choose to hug the faux morale high ground versus us. Eventually you will run out of arrows and realize that your a puppet to our puppeteer. Also golds value is a perception to mankind. Anything can be valuable to anyone.
  21. [quote name='bcortell' timestamp='1302584886' post='2689229'] He should have known this war would go a lot longer than what a blitz could account for. [/quote] I just said we did. Jeez :3
×
×
  • Create New...